The Concept of Meaninglessness
Originally published in 1970. Many contemporary philosophers have thought that certain philosophic disputes could be settled by using the concept of meaninglessness. To solve philosophic problems in this way, however, it seemed necessary to provide a reliable criterion for deciding when a particular...
Saved in:
: | |
---|---|
Place / Publishing House: | Baltimore, : Johns Hopkins Press, [1970] ©[1970] |
Year of Publication: | 2019 1970 |
Language: | English |
Physical Description: | 1 online resource (164 p.) |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
id |
993549446304498 |
---|---|
ctrlnum |
(CKB)4100000010460773 (OCoLC)1117489466 (MdBmJHUP)muse77221 (oapen)https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/88858 (EXLCZ)994100000010460773 |
collection |
bib_alma |
record_format |
marc |
spelling |
Erwin, Edward, 1937- The Concept of Meaninglessness Johns Hopkins University Press 2019 Baltimore, Johns Hopkins Press [1970] ©[1970] 1 online resource (164 p.) text txt rdacontent computer c rdamedia online resource cr rdacarrier Includes bibliographical references. Description based on print version record. Originally published in 1970. Many contemporary philosophers have thought that certain philosophic disputes could be settled by using the concept of meaninglessness. To solve philosophic problems in this way, however, it seemed necessary to provide a reliable criterion for deciding when a particular sentence or statement is meaningless. But devising such a criterion has proved to be very difficult. In fact, in recent years many philosophers have become quite skeptical about the adequacy of the standard criteria of meaninglessness. Some of the more radical skeptics have even argued that the concept of meaninglessness, as it is used by philosophers, is itself defective and would be even if an adequate criterion could be found. Professor Erwin, in a systematic study of the concept of meaninglessness, begins by examining the standard criteria of meaninglessness proposed by philosophers. These criteria include operationalist, verificationist, and type or category criteria. Each of these criteria, he argues, is inadequate. Erwin then turns to the question, What kinds of items, if any, should be said to be meaningless? Most philosophers concerned with this question have claimed that only sentences, not statements or propositions, can be meaningless. Erwin argues, however, that this is wrong: statements (and propositions) can be meaningless. Once this is demonstrated, it can then be shown that the more radical skepticism about the philosophic use of the concept of meaninglessness is misguided. In particular, Erwin shows that the following assertions of the radical skeptic are false: that what is meaningless is relative to a given language or to a given time, and that the concept of meaninglessness forces us to condemn as nonsense metaphors comprehensible to competent speakers of English. In his concluding chapter, Erwin considers the implications of there not being any adequate general criterion of meaninglessness. He then tries to show how the concept of meaninglessness, when interpreted in the manner he suggests, can be profitably used by philosophers, despite the many persuasive objections to its use that philosophers have raised in their disputes over it. English Meaninglessness (Philosophy) Electronic books. History of philosophy, philosophical traditions 1-4214-3106-8 1-4214-3069-X |
language |
English |
format |
eBook |
author |
Erwin, Edward, 1937- |
spellingShingle |
Erwin, Edward, 1937- The Concept of Meaninglessness |
author_facet |
Erwin, Edward, 1937- |
author_variant |
e e ee |
author_sort |
Erwin, Edward, 1937- |
title |
The Concept of Meaninglessness |
title_full |
The Concept of Meaninglessness |
title_fullStr |
The Concept of Meaninglessness |
title_full_unstemmed |
The Concept of Meaninglessness |
title_auth |
The Concept of Meaninglessness |
title_new |
The Concept of Meaninglessness |
title_sort |
the concept of meaninglessness |
publisher |
Johns Hopkins University Press Johns Hopkins Press |
publishDate |
2019 1970 |
physical |
1 online resource (164 p.) |
isbn |
1-4214-3070-3 1-4214-3106-8 1-4214-3069-X |
callnumber-first |
B - Philosophy, Psychology, Religion |
callnumber-subject |
B - Philosophy |
callnumber-label |
B825 |
callnumber-sort |
B 3825.2 E7 |
genre |
Electronic books. |
genre_facet |
Electronic books. |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
dewey-hundreds |
100 - Philosophy & psychology |
dewey-tens |
110 - Metaphysics |
dewey-ones |
111 - Ontology |
dewey-full |
111.8 |
dewey-sort |
3111.8 |
dewey-raw |
111.8 |
dewey-search |
111.8 |
oclc_num |
1117489466 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT erwinedward theconceptofmeaninglessness AT erwinedward conceptofmeaninglessness |
status_str |
c |
ids_txt_mv |
(CKB)4100000010460773 (OCoLC)1117489466 (MdBmJHUP)muse77221 (oapen)https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/88858 (EXLCZ)994100000010460773 |
carrierType_str_mv |
cr |
is_hierarchy_title |
The Concept of Meaninglessness |
_version_ |
1787551684211245057 |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>03503cam a22004334a 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">993549446304498</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230621141102.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="006">m o d </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr||||||||nn|n</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">701215s1970 mdu o 00 0 eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="010" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="z"> 75101456 </subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1-4214-3070-3</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(CKB)4100000010460773</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1117489466</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(MdBmJHUP)muse77221</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(oapen)https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/88858</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(EXLCZ)994100000010460773</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">MdBmJHUP</subfield><subfield code="c">MdBmJHUP</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">B825.2</subfield><subfield code="b">.E7</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">111.8</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Erwin, Edward,</subfield><subfield code="d">1937-</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">The Concept of Meaninglessness</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">Johns Hopkins University Press</subfield><subfield code="c">2019</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Baltimore,</subfield><subfield code="b">Johns Hopkins Press</subfield><subfield code="c">[1970]</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="c">©[1970]</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 online resource (164 p.)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">computer</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">online resource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="504" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Includes bibliographical references.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="588" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Description based on print version record.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Originally published in 1970. Many contemporary philosophers have thought that certain philosophic disputes could be settled by using the concept of meaninglessness. To solve philosophic problems in this way, however, it seemed necessary to provide a reliable criterion for deciding when a particular sentence or statement is meaningless. But devising such a criterion has proved to be very difficult. In fact, in recent years many philosophers have become quite skeptical about the adequacy of the standard criteria of meaninglessness. Some of the more radical skeptics have even argued that the concept of meaninglessness, as it is used by philosophers, is itself defective and would be even if an adequate criterion could be found. Professor Erwin, in a systematic study of the concept of meaninglessness, begins by examining the standard criteria of meaninglessness proposed by philosophers. These criteria include operationalist, verificationist, and type or category criteria. Each of these criteria, he argues, is inadequate. Erwin then turns to the question, What kinds of items, if any, should be said to be meaningless? Most philosophers concerned with this question have claimed that only sentences, not statements or propositions, can be meaningless. Erwin argues, however, that this is wrong: statements (and propositions) can be meaningless. Once this is demonstrated, it can then be shown that the more radical skepticism about the philosophic use of the concept of meaninglessness is misguided. In particular, Erwin shows that the following assertions of the radical skeptic are false: that what is meaningless is relative to a given language or to a given time, and that the concept of meaninglessness forces us to condemn as nonsense metaphors comprehensible to competent speakers of English. In his concluding chapter, Erwin considers the implications of there not being any adequate general criterion of meaninglessness. He then tries to show how the concept of meaninglessness, when interpreted in the manner he suggests, can be profitably used by philosophers, despite the many persuasive objections to its use that philosophers have raised in their disputes over it.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="546" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">English</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Meaninglessness (Philosophy)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="655" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Electronic books. </subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">History of philosophy, philosophical traditions</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="z">1-4214-3106-8</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="z">1-4214-3069-X</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="906" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">BOOK</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="ADM" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">2023-08-29 06:31:23 Europe/Vienna</subfield><subfield code="f">system</subfield><subfield code="c">marc21</subfield><subfield code="a">2020-03-07 22:00:26 Europe/Vienna</subfield><subfield code="g">false</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="AVE" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="i">DOAB Directory of Open Access Books</subfield><subfield code="P">DOAB Directory of Open Access Books</subfield><subfield code="x">https://eu02.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/uresolver/43ACC_OEAW/openurl?u.ignore_date_coverage=true&portfolio_pid=5339003660004498&Force_direct=true</subfield><subfield code="Z">5339003660004498</subfield><subfield code="b">Available</subfield><subfield code="8">5339003660004498</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |