Enduring Liberalism : American Political Thought Since the 1960s / / Robert Booth Fowler.

Has the United States become more pluribus than unum? In terms of the nation's political beliefs, Robert Booth Fowler answers both yes and no. While his study affirms significant diversity among an elite cadre of public intellectuals, it vigorously denies it in a general public that collectivel...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Superior document:American Political Thought
:
Place / Publishing House:Lawrence, Kan. : : University Press of Kansas,, 1999.
Year of Publication:1999
Edition:1st ed.
Language:English
Series:American Political Thought
Physical Description:1 online resource (xvii, 331 p.)
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
LEADER 04081cam a22004454a 4500
001 993549430004498
005 20230621140651.0
006 m o d
007 cr||||||||nn|n
008 990428s2000 ksu o 00 0 eng d
010 |z  99027237  
020 |a 0-7006-0974-1 
035 |a (CKB)5600000000014922 
035 |a (OCoLC)1148915674 
035 |a (MdBmJHUP)musev2_94110 
035 |a (oapen)https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/88498 
035 |a (MiAaPQ)EBC7295345 
035 |a (Au-PeEL)EBL7295345 
035 |a (EXLCZ)995600000000014922 
040 |a MdBmJHUP  |c MdBmJHUP 
041 0 |a eng 
043 |a n-us--- 
050 0 4 |a JC574.2.U6  |b F68 1999 
082 0 |a 320.51/3/097309045  |2 21 
100 1 |a Fowler, Robert Booth,  |d 1940- 
245 1 0 |a Enduring Liberalism  |b American Political Thought Since the 1960s /  |c Robert Booth Fowler. 
250 |a 1st ed. 
260 |b University Press of Kansas  |c 1999 
264 1 |b University Press of Kansas,  |c 1999.  |a Lawrence, Kan. : 
300 |a 1 online resource (xvii, 331 p.) 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
490 1 |a American Political Thought 
588 |a Description based on print version record. 
504 |a Includes bibliographical references (p. 289-317) and index. 
520 |a Has the United States become more pluribus than unum? In terms of the nation's political beliefs, Robert Booth Fowler answers both yes and no. While his study affirms significant diversity among an elite cadre of public intellectuals, it vigorously denies it in a general public that collectively adheres to the same set of liberal core values.Enduring Liberalism pursues two objectives. One, it explores the political thought of public intellectuals and the general public since the 1960s. Two, it assesses contemporary and classic interpretations of American political thought in light of the study's findings.Fowler interprets the writings of public intellectuals like Robert Bellah, Jean Bethke Elshtain, Michael Walzer, William Bennett, Seymour Martin Lipset, William Galston, and others, as well as survey data of American political attitudes, to spotlight this oftignored divide between citizens and highprofile commentators, whose contentious debates are mistakenly assumed to reflect countrywide rifts.Fowler's argument is straightforward, but the interpretation is controversial. He recounts how the consensus liberal view in postWorld War II American political thought collapsed among public intellectuals during the tumult of the 1960s and remains so to this day. His book examines the resultant diversity among contemporary public intellectuals, focusing on three predominant themes: concern for community, worry about the environment, and interest in civil society. In marked contrast to these disputatious commentators, Fowler finds the realm of popular opinion to be characterized by much greater consensus. Indeed, there seems to be a trend toward an even more general embrace of the liberal values that characterize our attitudes toward the individual, individual liberty, political equality, economic opportunity, and consent of the governed. Liberal values—above all the celebration of the individual and individual rights—have revolutionized the socalled private realms of life like family and religious communities to an extent unimagined in the 1950s.From these conclusions, Fowler demonstrates that most interpretations of American political thinking have exaggerated the extent of conflict and diversity in our nation's often raucous policy disputes. But he also cautions us not to overstate the public's widely shared liberal values and, by doing so, miss opportunities to facilitate problem solving or to recognize the ways in which our reform efforts may be constrained. 
546 |a English 
650 0 |a Political science  |z United States  |x History  |y 20th century. 
650 0 |a Consensus (Social sciences)  |z United States  |x History  |y 20th century. 
650 0 |a Liberalism  |z United States  |x History  |y 20th century. 
655 4 |a Electronic books.  
653 |a Political science & theory 
776 |z 0-7006-3090-2 
830 0 |a American Political Thought 
906 |a BOOK 
ADM |b 2024-04-27 05:37:52 Europe/Vienna  |f system  |c marc21  |a 2021-10-09 22:12:07 Europe/Vienna  |g false 
AVE |i DOAB Directory of Open Access Books  |P DOAB Directory of Open Access Books  |x https://eu02.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/uresolver/43ACC_OEAW/openurl?u.ignore_date_coverage=true&portfolio_pid=5339018770004498&Force_direct=true  |Z 5339018770004498  |b Available  |8 5339018770004498