Hegel's circular epistemology / / Tom Rockmore.
Since Aristotle, traditional strategies for knowledge have been linear. By contrast, circular epistemology, a basic but rarely discussed concept in Hegel's thought, is a theory of knowledge that does not depend on certainty with respect to first principles. Tom Rockmore examines and evaluates H...
Saved in:
VerfasserIn: | |
---|---|
Place / Publishing House: | Bloomington : : Indiana University Press,, [1986] ©1986 |
Year of Publication: | 1986 |
Language: | English |
Physical Description: | 1 online resource (xv, 202 pages) |
Notes: | Includes index. |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
id |
993549349804498 |
---|---|
ctrlnum |
(CKB)5600000000001720 (NjHacI)995600000000001720 (oapen)https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/88331 (EXLCZ)995600000000001720 |
collection |
bib_alma |
record_format |
marc |
spelling |
Rockmore, Tom, author. Hegel's circular epistemology / Tom Rockmore. Indiana University Press 1986 Bloomington : Indiana University Press, [1986] ©1986 1 online resource (xv, 202 pages) text txt rdacontent computer c rdamedia online resource cr rdacarrier Description based on: online resource; title from PDF information screen (Project muse, viewed December 22, 2022). Includes index. Since Aristotle, traditional strategies for knowledge have been linear. By contrast, circular epistemology, a basic but rarely discussed concept in Hegel's thought, is a theory of knowledge that does not depend on certainty with respect to first principles. Tom Rockmore examines and evaluates Hegel's novel approach to knowledge against the background of the philosophic tradition, attending to the relation between the systematic and historical aspects of Hegel's thought. After reconstructing the complex historical context in which Hegel's theory took form, Rockmore studies in detail its initial formulation in the Differenzschrift. Circular epistemology is next examined in Hegel's mature thought in both systematic and historic perspectives. Finally, Hegel's approach to knowledge as intrinsically circular is evaluated in relation to subsequent philosophy, especially phenomenology and analytic thought. Rockmore concludes that although Hegel was correct in rejecting linear formsof argumentation, he was wrong in thinking that a circular approach yields knowledge in the full, traditional sense that has been a central goal in philosophical inquiry at least since Plato. English Knowledge, Theory of. Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich, 1770-1831. Philosophy |
language |
English |
format |
eBook |
author |
Rockmore, Tom, |
spellingShingle |
Rockmore, Tom, Hegel's circular epistemology / |
author_facet |
Rockmore, Tom, |
author_variant |
t r tr |
author_role |
VerfasserIn |
author_sort |
Rockmore, Tom, |
title |
Hegel's circular epistemology / |
title_full |
Hegel's circular epistemology / Tom Rockmore. |
title_fullStr |
Hegel's circular epistemology / Tom Rockmore. |
title_full_unstemmed |
Hegel's circular epistemology / Tom Rockmore. |
title_auth |
Hegel's circular epistemology / |
title_new |
Hegel's circular epistemology / |
title_sort |
hegel's circular epistemology / |
publisher |
Indiana University Press Indiana University Press, |
publishDate |
1986 |
physical |
1 online resource (xv, 202 pages) |
isbn |
0-253-05324-2 |
callnumber-first |
B - Philosophy, Psychology, Religion |
callnumber-subject |
B - Philosophy |
callnumber-label |
B2948 |
callnumber-sort |
B 42948 R635 41986 |
era_facet |
1770-1831. |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
dewey-hundreds |
100 - Philosophy & psychology |
dewey-tens |
190 - Modern western philosophy |
dewey-ones |
193 - Philosophy of Germany & Austria |
dewey-full |
193 |
dewey-sort |
3193 |
dewey-raw |
193 |
dewey-search |
193 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT rockmoretom hegelscircularepistemology |
status_str |
n |
ids_txt_mv |
(CKB)5600000000001720 (NjHacI)995600000000001720 (oapen)https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/88331 (EXLCZ)995600000000001720 |
carrierType_str_mv |
cr |
is_hierarchy_title |
Hegel's circular epistemology / |
_version_ |
1796651924414529536 |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01009nam a2200301 i 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">993549349804498</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20221223121706.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="006">m o d </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr |||||||||||</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">221223s1986 inu o 001 0 eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">0-253-05324-2</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(CKB)5600000000001720</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(NjHacI)995600000000001720</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(oapen)https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/88331</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(EXLCZ)995600000000001720</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">NjHacI</subfield><subfield code="b">eng</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield><subfield code="c">NjHacl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">B2948</subfield><subfield code="b">.R635 1986</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">193</subfield><subfield code="2">23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Rockmore, Tom,</subfield><subfield code="e">author.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Hegel's circular epistemology /</subfield><subfield code="c">Tom Rockmore.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">Indiana University Press</subfield><subfield code="c">1986</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Bloomington :</subfield><subfield code="b">Indiana University Press,</subfield><subfield code="c">[1986]</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="c">©1986</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 online resource (xv, 202 pages)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">computer</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">online resource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="588" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Description based on: online resource; title from PDF information screen (Project muse, viewed December 22, 2022).</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Includes index.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Since Aristotle, traditional strategies for knowledge have been linear. By contrast, circular epistemology, a basic but rarely discussed concept in Hegel's thought, is a theory of knowledge that does not depend on certainty with respect to first principles. Tom Rockmore examines and evaluates Hegel's novel approach to knowledge against the background of the philosophic tradition, attending to the relation between the systematic and historical aspects of Hegel's thought. After reconstructing the complex historical context in which Hegel's theory took form, Rockmore studies in detail its initial formulation in the Differenzschrift. Circular epistemology is next examined in Hegel's mature thought in both systematic and historic perspectives. Finally, Hegel's approach to knowledge as intrinsically circular is evaluated in relation to subsequent philosophy, especially phenomenology and analytic thought. Rockmore concludes that although Hegel was correct in rejecting linear formsof argumentation, he was wrong in thinking that a circular approach yields knowledge in the full, traditional sense that has been a central goal in philosophical inquiry at least since Plato.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="546" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">English</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Knowledge, Theory of.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="600" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich,</subfield><subfield code="d">1770-1831.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Philosophy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="906" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">BOOK</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="ADM" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">2023-02-22 21:13:45 Europe/Vienna</subfield><subfield code="f">system</subfield><subfield code="c">marc21</subfield><subfield code="a">2021-07-31 22:11:52 Europe/Vienna</subfield><subfield code="g">false</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="AVE" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="i">DOAB Directory of Open Access Books</subfield><subfield code="P">DOAB Directory of Open Access Books</subfield><subfield code="x">https://eu02.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/uresolver/43ACC_OEAW/openurl?u.ignore_date_coverage=true&portfolio_pid=5338974710004498&Force_direct=true</subfield><subfield code="Z">5338974710004498</subfield><subfield code="b">Available</subfield><subfield code="8">5338974710004498</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |