The occurrence of separate opinions at the Federal Constitutional Court : : an analysis with a novel database / / Caroline Elisabeth Wittig.
Courts with the right to constitutional review exert considerable power in a political system. However, especially for Kelsenian constitutional courts there are hardly any large-N studies. This is mainly due to a lack of data. For the German Federal Constitutional Court, this gap has been closed by...
Saved in:
: | |
---|---|
VerfasserIn: | |
TeilnehmendeR: | |
Place / Publishing House: | Berlin : : Logos Verlag Berlin GmbH,, [2016] ©2016 |
Year of Publication: | 2016 |
Language: | English |
Physical Description: | 1 online resource (xvi, 162 pages) :; illustrations, charts; digital file(s). |
Notes: | Originally presented as the author's thesis--University of Mannheim, 2016. |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
id |
993548670304498 |
---|---|
ctrlnum |
(CKB)4340000000242300 (MiAaPQ)EBC5216259 (oapen)https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/64463 (ScCtBLL)f894e1ac-5b1d-41d9-8b40-3927367b0ff1 (EXLCZ)994340000000242300 |
collection |
bib_alma |
record_format |
marc |
spelling |
Wittig, Caroline Elisabeth, author. The occurrence of separate opinions at the Federal Constitutional Court : an analysis with a novel database / Caroline Elisabeth Wittig. Berlin/Germany Logos Verlag Berlin 2016 Berlin : Logos Verlag Berlin GmbH, [2016] ©2016 1 online resource (xvi, 162 pages) : illustrations, charts; digital file(s). text txt rdacontent computer c rdamedia online resource cr rdacarrier Originally presented as the author's thesis--University of Mannheim, 2016. Includes bibliographical references. Also available in print form. In English. Description based on print version record. Description based on e-publication, viewed on August 13, 2021. Courts with the right to constitutional review exert considerable power in a political system. However, especially for Kelsenian constitutional courts there are hardly any large-N studies. This is mainly due to a lack of data. For the German Federal Constitutional Court, this gap has been closed by building a novel database, the development of which is depicted in this book. Employing data from this database, the occurrence of separate opinions in general and their different types in particular are analyzed. The book introduces a new, universal theory that reconciles and expands existing explanations. In a second step, the theory is applied to the German Federal Constitutional Court. It can be proven that one factor that has been neglected so far plays a decisive role: The judges' behavior depends on the profession they pursue after their time in office. Moreover, the study shows that -- contrary to the common literature -- it is not mainly the topic that determines a case's conflict potential but rather the number of issues a decision has to address. Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode Unrestricted online access star Germany. Bundesverfassungsgericht. Judicial opinions Germany. Judicial Politics German Federal Constitutional Court Judicial Behavior Databases Quantitative Analyses Universität Mannheim, degree awarding institution. Print version: 3832544119 |
language |
English |
format |
eBook |
author |
Wittig, Caroline Elisabeth, |
spellingShingle |
Wittig, Caroline Elisabeth, The occurrence of separate opinions at the Federal Constitutional Court : an analysis with a novel database / |
author_facet |
Wittig, Caroline Elisabeth, Universität Mannheim, Universität Mannheim, |
author_variant |
c e w ce cew |
author_role |
VerfasserIn |
author2 |
Universität Mannheim, |
author2_role |
TeilnehmendeR |
author_corporate |
Universität Mannheim, |
author_sort |
Wittig, Caroline Elisabeth, |
title |
The occurrence of separate opinions at the Federal Constitutional Court : an analysis with a novel database / |
title_sub |
an analysis with a novel database / |
title_full |
The occurrence of separate opinions at the Federal Constitutional Court : an analysis with a novel database / Caroline Elisabeth Wittig. |
title_fullStr |
The occurrence of separate opinions at the Federal Constitutional Court : an analysis with a novel database / Caroline Elisabeth Wittig. |
title_full_unstemmed |
The occurrence of separate opinions at the Federal Constitutional Court : an analysis with a novel database / Caroline Elisabeth Wittig. |
title_auth |
The occurrence of separate opinions at the Federal Constitutional Court : an analysis with a novel database / |
title_new |
The occurrence of separate opinions at the Federal Constitutional Court : |
title_sort |
the occurrence of separate opinions at the federal constitutional court : an analysis with a novel database / |
publisher |
Logos Verlag Berlin Logos Verlag Berlin GmbH, |
publishDate |
2016 |
physical |
1 online resource (xvi, 162 pages) : illustrations, charts; digital file(s). Also available in print form. |
isbn |
3-8325-9988-6 3832544119 |
callnumber-first |
K - Law |
callnumber-label |
KK5498 |
callnumber-sort |
KK 45498 W588 42016 |
geographic_facet |
Germany. |
illustrated |
Illustrated |
dewey-hundreds |
300 - Social sciences |
dewey-tens |
340 - Law |
dewey-ones |
342 - Constitutional & administrative law |
dewey-full |
342.43 |
dewey-sort |
3342.43 |
dewey-raw |
342.43 |
dewey-search |
342.43 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT wittigcarolineelisabeth theoccurrenceofseparateopinionsatthefederalconstitutionalcourtananalysiswithanoveldatabase AT universitatmannheim theoccurrenceofseparateopinionsatthefederalconstitutionalcourtananalysiswithanoveldatabase AT wittigcarolineelisabeth occurrenceofseparateopinionsatthefederalconstitutionalcourtananalysiswithanoveldatabase AT universitatmannheim occurrenceofseparateopinionsatthefederalconstitutionalcourtananalysiswithanoveldatabase |
status_str |
c |
ids_txt_mv |
(CKB)4340000000242300 (MiAaPQ)EBC5216259 (oapen)https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/64463 (ScCtBLL)f894e1ac-5b1d-41d9-8b40-3927367b0ff1 (EXLCZ)994340000000242300 |
carrierType_str_mv |
cr |
is_hierarchy_title |
The occurrence of separate opinions at the Federal Constitutional Court : an analysis with a novel database / |
author2_original_writing_str_mv |
noLinkedField |
_version_ |
1802073073383374848 |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>03295cam a2200553 i 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">993548670304498</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20240424225727.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="006">m o d | </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr#cnu||||||||</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">180508t20162016gw ad fob 000 0 eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">3-8325-9988-6</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="024" ind1="8" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">https://doi.org/10.30819/4411</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(CKB)4340000000242300</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(MiAaPQ)EBC5216259</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(oapen)https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/64463</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ScCtBLL)f894e1ac-5b1d-41d9-8b40-3927367b0ff1</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(EXLCZ)994340000000242300</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">MiAaPQ</subfield><subfield code="b">eng</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield><subfield code="e">pn</subfield><subfield code="c">MiAaPQ</subfield><subfield code="d">MiAaPQ</subfield><subfield code="d">UkMaJRU</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="043" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">e-gx---</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">KK5498</subfield><subfield code="b">.W588 2016</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">342.43</subfield><subfield code="2">23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Wittig, Caroline Elisabeth,</subfield><subfield code="e">author.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">The occurrence of separate opinions at the Federal Constitutional Court :</subfield><subfield code="b">an analysis with a novel database /</subfield><subfield code="c">Caroline Elisabeth Wittig.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Berlin/Germany</subfield><subfield code="b">Logos Verlag Berlin</subfield><subfield code="c">2016</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Berlin :</subfield><subfield code="b">Logos Verlag Berlin GmbH,</subfield><subfield code="c">[2016]</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="c">©2016</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 online resource (xvi, 162 pages) :</subfield><subfield code="b">illustrations, charts; digital file(s).</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">computer</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">online resource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Originally presented as the author's thesis--University of Mannheim, 2016.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="504" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Includes bibliographical references.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="530" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Also available in print form.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="546" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">In English.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="588" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Description based on print version record.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="588" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Description based on e-publication, viewed on August 13, 2021.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Courts with the right to constitutional review exert considerable power in a political system. However, especially for Kelsenian constitutional courts there are hardly any large-N studies. This is mainly due to a lack of data. For the German Federal Constitutional Court, this gap has been closed by building a novel database, the development of which is depicted in this book. Employing data from this database, the occurrence of separate opinions in general and their different types in particular are analyzed. The book introduces a new, universal theory that reconciles and expands existing explanations. In a second step, the theory is applied to the German Federal Constitutional Court. It can be proven that one factor that has been neglected so far plays a decisive role: The judges' behavior depends on the profession they pursue after their time in office. Moreover, the study shows that -- contrary to the common literature -- it is not mainly the topic that determines a case's conflict potential but rather the number of issues a decision has to address.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International</subfield><subfield code="f">CC BY-NC-ND 4.0</subfield><subfield code="u">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="506" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="f">Unrestricted online access</subfield><subfield code="2">star</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="610" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Germany.</subfield><subfield code="b">Bundesverfassungsgericht.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Judicial opinions</subfield><subfield code="z">Germany.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Judicial Politics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">German Federal Constitutional Court</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Judicial Behavior</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Databases</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Quantitative Analyses</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="710" ind1="2" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Universität Mannheim,</subfield><subfield code="e">degree awarding institution.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Print version:</subfield><subfield code="z">3832544119</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="906" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">BOOK</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="ADM" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">2024-04-26 02:58:25 Europe/Vienna</subfield><subfield code="d">00</subfield><subfield code="f">system</subfield><subfield code="c">marc21</subfield><subfield code="a">2018-03-10 17:16:05 Europe/Vienna</subfield><subfield code="g">false</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="AVE" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="i">DOAB Directory of Open Access Books</subfield><subfield code="P">DOAB Directory of Open Access Books</subfield><subfield code="x">https://eu02.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/uresolver/43ACC_OEAW/openurl?u.ignore_date_coverage=true&portfolio_pid=5338883610004498&Force_direct=true</subfield><subfield code="Z">5338883610004498</subfield><subfield code="b">Available</subfield><subfield code="8">5338883610004498</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |