Digital writing : assessment and evaluation.

Writing has changed due to the affordances of digital technologies, and writing assessment has changed as well. As writing programs integrate more digital writing work, students, teachers, and administrators face the rewards and challenges of assessing and evaluating multimodal and networked writing...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
:
TeilnehmendeR:
Place / Publishing House:Logan, Utah : : Computers and Composition Digital Press,, 2013.
©2013
Year of Publication:2012
2013
Language:English
Physical Description:1 online resource :; digital, HTML file(s).
Notes:Bibliographic Level Mode of Issuance: Monograph
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
LEADER 04539cam a2200529 i 4500
001 993547507104498
005 20230803032243.0
006 m fs d
007 cr#m|#---|||||
008 160829s2013 utu fob 000 0 eng d
035 |a (CKB)2670000000517639 
035 |a (SSID)ssj0001680104 
035 |a (PQKBManifestationID)16496008 
035 |a (PQKBTitleCode)TC0001680104 
035 |a (PQKBWorkID)15028166 
035 |a (PQKB)11448672 
035 |a (WaSeSS)IndRDA00057243 
035 |a (oapen)https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/45153 
035 |a (EXLCZ)992670000000517639 
040 |a PQKB  |d UkMaJRU  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
050 4 |a PN171.O55 
100 1 |a Heidi A. McKee  |4 auth 
245 0 0 |a Digital writing  |h [electronic resource] :  |b assessment and evaluation. 
246 1 |a Digital writing :  |b assessment and evaluation 
260 |b Utah State University Press/ Computers and Composition Digital Press  |c 2012 
264 1 |a Logan, Utah :  |b Computers and Composition Digital Press,  |c 2013. 
264 4 |c ©2013 
300 |a 1 online resource :  |b digital, HTML file(s). 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
347 |a text file  |2 rda 
500 |a Bibliographic Level Mode of Issuance: Monograph 
504 |a Includes bibliographical references. 
505 0 |a Foreword --Preface --Part I: equity and assessment --Part II: classroom evaluation and assessment --Part III: multimodal evaluation and assessment --Part IV: program revisioning and program assessment --Afterword. 
546 |a English 
520 |a Writing has changed due to the affordances of digital technologies, and writing assessment has changed as well. As writing programs integrate more digital writing work, students, teachers, and administrators face the rewards and challenges of assessing and evaluating multimodal and networked writing projects. Whether classroom-based or program-level; whether in first-year writing, technical communication, or writing-across-the-curriculum; whether formative or summative; and whether for purposes of placement, grading, self-study, or external reporting, digital writing complicates the processes and practices of assessment. The chapters in Digital Writing Assessment & Evaluation place emphasis on assessment of digital writing—the methodological, technological, and ethical approaches for and issues involved with assessing multimodal, networked texts (and the student learning they represent). Authors address questions such as: How do different approaches to assessing traditional writing (8 1/2 x 11 word-centric texts) port—or not—to the assessment of digital writing? What challenges and opportunities for assessment do multimodal, networked texts present to teachers, program administrators, state-wide organizations, etc.? What material and technological resources are needed when assessing digital writing and/or how might existing resources need to be modified? How are processes and products of selection, collection, and reflection different (or not) with the multimodal affordances of digital technologies? How do guidelines and outcomes of groups such as CCCC, NCTE, WPA, AAC&U, impact approaches to assessment? How might these guidelines and outcomes need to be revised to better address digital writing assessment? How might the multimodal, networked affordances of digital writing affect issues of equity and access? How might groups often disenfranchised by more traditional assessment be impacted by digital writing assessment? How might eportfolios be designed for showcasing the collaborative composing processes of multimodal and/or networked writing? By what criteria should program administrators and instructors assess and select course-management and/or eportfolio systems? The fourteen chapters are organized into four sections, addressing equity and assessment, classroom evaluation and assessment, multimodal evaluation and assessment, and program revisioning and program assessment. Andrea Lunsford provides the foreword to the book; Edward White is the author of the afterword. 
650 0 |a English language  |x Rhetoric  |x Computer-assisted instruction. 
650 7 |a Literature - General  |2 HILCC 
650 7 |a Languages & Literatures  |2 HILCC 
653 |a evaluation 
653 |a assessment 
653 |a digital writing 
700 1 |a McKee, Heidi A.,  |e editor. 
700 1 |a DeVoss, Dànielle Nicole,  |e editor. 
776 |z 0-87421-949-3 
906 |a BOOK 
ADM |b 2023-08-05 06:03:56 Europe/Vienna  |d 00  |f system  |c marc21  |a 2014-03-01 22:29:16 Europe/Vienna  |g false 
AVE |i DOAB Directory of Open Access Books  |P DOAB Directory of Open Access Books  |x https://eu02.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/uresolver/43ACC_OEAW/openurl?u.ignore_date_coverage=true&portfolio_pid=5338514650004498&Force_direct=true  |Z 5338514650004498  |b Available  |8 5338514650004498