The role of standard-setting organizations with regard to balancing the rights between the owners and the users of standard-essential patents / / Jurgita Randakevičiūtė.

• Superior document: MIPLC studies ; volume 27
• VerfasserIn: Randakevičiūtė, Jurgita,
• Place / Publishing House: Baden-Baden, Germany :, Augsburg ;, München ;, Washington, DC : : Nomos ;, MIPLC, Munich Intellectual Property Louisiana Center,, 2015.
• Year of Publication: 2015
• Edition: First edition.
• Language: English
• Series: MIPLC studies ; volume 27.
• Physical Description: 1 online resource (67 p.)
• Notes: Originally presented as the author's thesis (L.LM.)--Munich Intellectual Property Law Center, 2014.

Standard-setting is an essential tool for promoting innovation, competition and resulting in benefits to consumers and businesses. However, due to the fact, that standards are usually protected by standard-essential patents (SEPs), standard-setting may obstruct the access to the standardized technology and create entry barriers into the market for those, who do not own SEPs. The afore-described events cause tension between the owners and the users of SEPs. In order to keep the balance between the afore-specified parties, standard-setting organizations (SSPs) come into play by requiring SEPs owners to license these patents on fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory (FRAND) terms. Nevertheless, the latter attempt quite often results in costly and time-consuming litigation, because the parties are not able to agree what kind of terms are FRAND. Such situation inevitably impedes the implementation of the standardized technology into industries and calls for a re-consideration of the role of SSOs during the process of standardization and after the standard is set. In this work, the possible role of SSOs while improving the access for the users to the standardized technology will be discussed.

Table of Contents

Cover; I. Introduction; II. SSOs and Their Functions in Standardization; A. The Process of Standardization: Definition and Importance; B. The Role of SSOs During Standardization and After the Standard Is Set; C. European Telecommunications Standards Institute; III. Issues Related to Standardization Leading to Litigation; A. Patent Ambush as an Abuse of a Dominant Position; B. Injunctive Relief in the Light of FRAND Commitment; C. FRAND Commitment in the Standardization and the Implementation of the Standard; IV. The Role of SSOs while Improving the Access to SEPs

A. The Obligation of Ex Ante Disclosure in the IPRs PoliciesB. The Role of SSOs in the Post-Standardization Stage; V. Conclusion; VI. List of Works Cited; A. Monographies and Articles; B. International Legal Acts; C. European Union Legislation; D. European Union Court of Justice Case Law; E. European Commission Decisions; F. Other European Union Materials; G. Legislation from other jurisdictions; H. Case law from other jurisdictions; I. Internal documents of SSOs; J. Conference materials; K. Websites and blogs