Reconsidering Constitutional Formation I National Sovereignty : A Comparative Analysis of the Juridification by Constitution / / edited by Ulrike Müßig.
Legal studies and consequently legal history focus on constitutional documents, believing in a nominalist autonomy of constitutional semantics.Reconsidering Constitutional Formation in the late 18th and 19th century, kept historic constitutions from being simply log-books for political experts throu...
Saved in:
Superior document: | Studies in the History of Law and Justice, 6 |
---|---|
HerausgeberIn: | |
Place / Publishing House: | Cham : : Springer International Publishing :, Imprint: Springer,, 2016. |
Year of Publication: | 2016 |
Edition: | 1st ed. 2016. |
Language: | English |
Series: | Studies in the History of Law and Justice,
6 |
Physical Description: | 1 online resource (XIII, 284 p. 1 illus. in color.) |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
id |
993546829104498 |
---|---|
ctrlnum |
(CKB)3710000000838356 (DE-He213)978-3-319-42405-7 (MiAaPQ)EBC5591440 (Au-PeEL)EBL5591440 (OCoLC)959803523 (oapen)https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/39509 (PPN)228319358 (EXLCZ)993710000000838356 |
collection |
bib_alma |
record_format |
marc |
spelling |
Müßig, Ulrike edt Reconsidering Constitutional Formation I National Sovereignty [electronic resource] : A Comparative Analysis of the Juridification by Constitution / edited by Ulrike Müßig. 1st ed. 2016. Cham : Springer International Publishing : Imprint: Springer, 2016. 1 online resource (XIII, 284 p. 1 illus. in color.) text txt rdacontent computer c rdamedia online resource cr rdacarrier Studies in the History of Law and Justice, 2198-9850 ; 6 English FP7 Ideas: European Research Council Juridification by Constitution. National Sovereignty in the 18th and 19th c. Europe; Ulrike Müßig -- National sovereignty in the Belgian Constitution of 1831. On the meaning(s) of article 25; Brecht Deseure -- The Omnipotence of Parliament in the legitimisation process of ‘representative government’ during the Albertine Statute (1848-1861); Giuseppe Mecca -- Sovereignty Issue in the Public Discussion in the Era of the Polish 3rd of May Constitution; Anna Tarnowska -- Appendix: English translation of the Statute ‘Our free Royal Cities in the States of Rzeczpospolita’ of April 18, 1791 by Ulrike Müßig and Max Bärnreuther, together with Inge Bily -- About the Authors -- Index . . Legal studies and consequently legal history focus on constitutional documents, believing in a nominalist autonomy of constitutional semantics.Reconsidering Constitutional Formation in the late 18th and 19th century, kept historic constitutions from being simply log-books for political experts through a functional approach to the interdependencies between constitution and public discourse. Sovereignty had to be ‘believed’ by the subjects and the political élites. Such a communicative orientation of constitutional processesbecame palpable in the ‘religious’ affinities of the constitutional preambles. They were held as ‘creeds’ of a new order, not only due to their occasional recourse to divine authority, but rather due to the claim for eternal validity contexts of constitutional guarantees. The communication dependency of constitutions was of less concern in terms of the preamble than the constituents’ big worries about government organisation. Their indecisiveness between monarchical and popular sovereignty was established through the discrediting of the Republic in the Jacobean reign of terror and the ‘renaissance’ of the monarchy in the military resistance against the French revolutionary and later Napoleonic campaigns. The constitutional formation as a legal act of constituting could therefore defend the monarchy from the threat of the people (Albertine Statute 1848), could be a legal decision of a national constituent assembly (Belgian Constitution 1831), could borrow from the old liberties (Polish May Constitution 1791) or try to remain in between by referring to the Nation as sovereign (French September Constitution 1791, Cádiz Constitution 1812). Common to all contexts is the use of national sovereignty as a legal starting point. The consequent differentiation between constituent and constituted power manages to justify the self-commitment of political power in legal terms. National sovereignty is the synonym for the juridification of sovereignty by means of the constitution. The novelty of the constitutions of the late 18th and 19th century is the normativity, the positivity of the constitutional law as one unified law, to be the measure for the legality of all other law. Therefore ReConFort will continue with the precedence of constitution. (www.reconfort.eu). Open Access Constitutional law. Law History. Law Philosophy. Constitutional Law. Legal History. Theories of Law, Philosophy of Law, Legal History. 3-319-42404-1 Müßig, Ulrike. editor. edt http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/edt |
language |
English |
format |
Electronic eBook |
author2 |
Müßig, Ulrike. Müßig, Ulrike. |
author_facet |
Müßig, Ulrike. Müßig, Ulrike. |
author2_variant |
u m um u m um u m um |
author2_role |
HerausgeberIn HerausgeberIn |
author_sort |
Müßig, Ulrike. |
title |
Reconsidering Constitutional Formation I National Sovereignty A Comparative Analysis of the Juridification by Constitution / |
spellingShingle |
Reconsidering Constitutional Formation I National Sovereignty A Comparative Analysis of the Juridification by Constitution / Studies in the History of Law and Justice, Juridification by Constitution. National Sovereignty in the 18th and 19th c. Europe; Ulrike Müßig -- National sovereignty in the Belgian Constitution of 1831. On the meaning(s) of article 25; Brecht Deseure -- The Omnipotence of Parliament in the legitimisation process of ‘representative government’ during the Albertine Statute (1848-1861); Giuseppe Mecca -- Sovereignty Issue in the Public Discussion in the Era of the Polish 3rd of May Constitution; Anna Tarnowska -- Appendix: English translation of the Statute ‘Our free Royal Cities in the States of Rzeczpospolita’ of April 18, 1791 by Ulrike Müßig and Max Bärnreuther, together with Inge Bily -- About the Authors -- Index . . |
title_sub |
A Comparative Analysis of the Juridification by Constitution / |
title_full |
Reconsidering Constitutional Formation I National Sovereignty [electronic resource] : A Comparative Analysis of the Juridification by Constitution / edited by Ulrike Müßig. |
title_fullStr |
Reconsidering Constitutional Formation I National Sovereignty [electronic resource] : A Comparative Analysis of the Juridification by Constitution / edited by Ulrike Müßig. |
title_full_unstemmed |
Reconsidering Constitutional Formation I National Sovereignty [electronic resource] : A Comparative Analysis of the Juridification by Constitution / edited by Ulrike Müßig. |
title_auth |
Reconsidering Constitutional Formation I National Sovereignty A Comparative Analysis of the Juridification by Constitution / |
title_new |
Reconsidering Constitutional Formation I National Sovereignty |
title_sort |
reconsidering constitutional formation i national sovereignty a comparative analysis of the juridification by constitution / |
series |
Studies in the History of Law and Justice, |
series2 |
Studies in the History of Law and Justice, |
publisher |
Springer International Publishing : Imprint: Springer, |
publishDate |
2016 |
physical |
1 online resource (XIII, 284 p. 1 illus. in color.) |
edition |
1st ed. 2016. |
contents |
Juridification by Constitution. National Sovereignty in the 18th and 19th c. Europe; Ulrike Müßig -- National sovereignty in the Belgian Constitution of 1831. On the meaning(s) of article 25; Brecht Deseure -- The Omnipotence of Parliament in the legitimisation process of ‘representative government’ during the Albertine Statute (1848-1861); Giuseppe Mecca -- Sovereignty Issue in the Public Discussion in the Era of the Polish 3rd of May Constitution; Anna Tarnowska -- Appendix: English translation of the Statute ‘Our free Royal Cities in the States of Rzeczpospolita’ of April 18, 1791 by Ulrike Müßig and Max Bärnreuther, together with Inge Bily -- About the Authors -- Index . . |
isbn |
3-319-42405-X 3-319-42404-1 |
issn |
2198-9850 ; |
callnumber-first |
K - Law |
callnumber-subject |
K - General Law |
callnumber-label |
K3154-3370 |
callnumber-sort |
K 43154 43370 |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
dewey-hundreds |
300 - Social sciences |
dewey-tens |
340 - Law |
dewey-ones |
342 - Constitutional & administrative law |
dewey-full |
342 |
dewey-sort |
3342 |
dewey-raw |
342 |
dewey-search |
342 |
oclc_num |
959803523 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT mußigulrike reconsideringconstitutionalformationinationalsovereigntyacomparativeanalysisofthejuridificationbyconstitution |
status_str |
n |
ids_txt_mv |
(CKB)3710000000838356 (DE-He213)978-3-319-42405-7 (MiAaPQ)EBC5591440 (Au-PeEL)EBL5591440 (OCoLC)959803523 (oapen)https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/39509 (PPN)228319358 (EXLCZ)993710000000838356 |
carrierType_str_mv |
cr |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Studies in the History of Law and Justice, 6 |
hierarchy_sequence |
6 |
is_hierarchy_title |
Reconsidering Constitutional Formation I National Sovereignty A Comparative Analysis of the Juridification by Constitution / |
container_title |
Studies in the History of Law and Justice, 6 |
author2_original_writing_str_mv |
noLinkedField noLinkedField |
_version_ |
1796648768558333952 |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>05010nam a22005415i 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">993546829104498</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230810190213.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="006">m o d | </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr nn 008mamaa</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">160818s2016 sz | o |||| 0|eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">3-319-42405-X</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/978-3-319-42405-7</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(CKB)3710000000838356</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-He213)978-3-319-42405-7</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(MiAaPQ)EBC5591440</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(Au-PeEL)EBL5591440</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)959803523</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(oapen)https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/39509</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(PPN)228319358</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(EXLCZ)993710000000838356</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">MiAaPQ</subfield><subfield code="b">eng</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield><subfield code="e">pn</subfield><subfield code="c">MiAaPQ</subfield><subfield code="d">MiAaPQ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">K3154-3370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="072" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">LND</subfield><subfield code="2">bicssc</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="072" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">LAW018000</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">342</subfield><subfield code="2">23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Müßig, Ulrike</subfield><subfield code="4">edt</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Reconsidering Constitutional Formation I National Sovereignty</subfield><subfield code="h">[electronic resource] :</subfield><subfield code="b">A Comparative Analysis of the Juridification by Constitution /</subfield><subfield code="c">edited by Ulrike Müßig.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="250" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1st ed. 2016.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Cham :</subfield><subfield code="b">Springer International Publishing :</subfield><subfield code="b">Imprint: Springer,</subfield><subfield code="c">2016.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 online resource (XIII, 284 p. 1 illus. in color.) </subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">computer</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">online resource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Studies in the History of Law and Justice,</subfield><subfield code="x">2198-9850 ;</subfield><subfield code="v">6</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="546" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">English</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="536" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">FP7 Ideas: European Research Council</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Juridification by Constitution. National Sovereignty in the 18th and 19th c. Europe; Ulrike Müßig -- National sovereignty in the Belgian Constitution of 1831. On the meaning(s) of article 25; Brecht Deseure -- The Omnipotence of Parliament in the legitimisation process of ‘representative government’ during the Albertine Statute (1848-1861); Giuseppe Mecca -- Sovereignty Issue in the Public Discussion in the Era of the Polish 3rd of May Constitution; Anna Tarnowska -- Appendix: English translation of the Statute ‘Our free Royal Cities in the States of Rzeczpospolita’ of April 18, 1791 by Ulrike Müßig and Max Bärnreuther, together with Inge Bily -- About the Authors -- Index . .</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Legal studies and consequently legal history focus on constitutional documents, believing in a nominalist autonomy of constitutional semantics.Reconsidering Constitutional Formation in the late 18th and 19th century, kept historic constitutions from being simply log-books for political experts through a functional approach to the interdependencies between constitution and public discourse. Sovereignty had to be ‘believed’ by the subjects and the political élites. Such a communicative orientation of constitutional processesbecame palpable in the ‘religious’ affinities of the constitutional preambles. They were held as ‘creeds’ of a new order, not only due to their occasional recourse to divine authority, but rather due to the claim for eternal validity contexts of constitutional guarantees. The communication dependency of constitutions was of less concern in terms of the preamble than the constituents’ big worries about government organisation. Their indecisiveness between monarchical and popular sovereignty was established through the discrediting of the Republic in the Jacobean reign of terror and the ‘renaissance’ of the monarchy in the military resistance against the French revolutionary and later Napoleonic campaigns. The constitutional formation as a legal act of constituting could therefore defend the monarchy from the threat of the people (Albertine Statute 1848), could be a legal decision of a national constituent assembly (Belgian Constitution 1831), could borrow from the old liberties (Polish May Constitution 1791) or try to remain in between by referring to the Nation as sovereign (French September Constitution 1791, Cádiz Constitution 1812). Common to all contexts is the use of national sovereignty as a legal starting point. The consequent differentiation between constituent and constituted power manages to justify the self-commitment of political power in legal terms. National sovereignty is the synonym for the juridification of sovereignty by means of the constitution. The novelty of the constitutions of the late 18th and 19th century is the normativity, the positivity of the constitutional law as one unified law, to be the measure for the legality of all other law. Therefore ReConFort will continue with the precedence of constitution. (www.reconfort.eu).</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="506" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Open Access</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Constitutional law.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Law</subfield><subfield code="x">History.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Law</subfield><subfield code="x">Philosophy.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Constitutional Law.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="2" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Legal History.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="2" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Theories of Law, Philosophy of Law, Legal History.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="z">3-319-42404-1</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Müßig, Ulrike.</subfield><subfield code="e">editor.</subfield><subfield code="4">edt</subfield><subfield code="4">http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/edt</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="830" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Studies in the History of Law and Justice,</subfield><subfield code="x">2198-9850 ;</subfield><subfield code="v">6</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="906" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">BOOK</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="ADM" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">2023-10-05 04:12:37 Europe/Vienna</subfield><subfield code="f">system</subfield><subfield code="c">marc21</subfield><subfield code="a">2016-09-10 18:36:29 Europe/Vienna</subfield><subfield code="g">false</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="AVE" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="i">DOAB Directory of Open Access Books</subfield><subfield code="P">DOAB Directory of Open Access Books</subfield><subfield code="x">https://eu02.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/uresolver/43ACC_OEAW/openurl?u.ignore_date_coverage=true&portfolio_pid=5338361290004498&Force_direct=true</subfield><subfield code="Z">5338361290004498</subfield><subfield code="b">Available</subfield><subfield code="8">5338361290004498</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |