Predictive sentencing : : normative and empirical perspectives / / edited by Jan W de Keijser, Julian V Roberts, Jesper Ryberg.

• TeilnehmendeR: Keijser, Jan Willem de, 1968-; Roberts, Julian V.,; Ryberg, Jesper,
• Place / Publishing House: Oxford, UK ;, Portland, Oregon : : Hart Publishing,, 2019.
• Year of Publication: 2019
• Edition: First edition.
• Language: English
• Physical Description: 1 online resource (x, 309 pages) :; illustrations
• Notes: Compliant with Level AA of the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines. Content is displayed as HTML full text which can easily be resized or read with assistive technology, with mark-up that allows screen readers and keyboard-only users to navigate easily.

"Predictive Sentencing addresses the role of risk assessment in contemporary sentencing practices. Predictive sentencing has become so deeply ingrained in Western criminal justice decision-making that despite early ethical discussions about selective incapacitation, it currently attracts little critique. Nor has it been subjected to a thorough normative and empirical scrutiny. This is problematic since much current policy and practice concerning risk predictions is inconsistent with mainstream theories of punishment. Moreover, predictive sentencing exacerbates discrimination and disparity in sentencing. Although structured risk assessments may have replaced 'gut feelings', and have now been systematically implemented in Western justice systems, the fundamental issues and questions that surround the use of risk assessment instruments at sentencing remain unresolved. This volume critically evaluates these issues and will be of great interest to scholars of criminal justice and criminology."--Bloomsbury Publishing.

Table of Contents

1. Introduction: Normative and Empirical Perspectives on Predictive Sentencing -- Jan W de Keijser, Julian V Roberts and Jesper Ryberg -- 2. The Use of Risk Assessment in Sentencing -- Esther FJC van Ginneken -- 3. Why Legal Philosophers (Including Retributivists) Should Be Less Resistant to Risk-Based Sentencing -- Douglas Husak -- 4. Risk and Retribution: On the Possibility of Reconciling Considerations of Dangerousness and Desert -- Jesper Ryberg -- 5. Is Preventive Detention Morally Worse than Quarantine? -- Thomas Douglas -- 6. Against Incapacitative Punishment -- Zachary Hoskins -- 7. A Defence of Modern Risk-Based Sentencing 7 -- Christopher Slobogin -- 8. Some Dilemmas of Indeterminate Sentences: Risk and Uncertainty, Dignity and Hope -- Andrew Ashworth and Lucia Zedner -- 9. The Problematic Role of Prior Record Enhancements in Predictive Sentencing -- Julian V Roberts and Richard S Frase -- 10. Unpacking Sentencing Algorithms: Risk, Racial Accountability and Data Harms -- Kelly Hannah-Moff at and Kelly Struthers Montford -- 11. The Scientific Validity of Current Approaches to Violence and Criminal Risk Assessment -- Seena Fazel -- 12. Risk Assessment at Sentencing: The Pennsylvania Experience -- Rhys Hester -- 13. Predictive Sentencing: An Analysis of Public Views -- Jan W de Keijser and Sigrid GC van Wingerden -- 14. Sentencing and Prediction: Old Wine in Old Bottles -- Michael Tonry.