Antibody Repertoire and Graft Outcome Following Solid Organ Transplantation
The first real major breakthrough that laid the basis of HLA antibody detection in the field of solid organ transplantation, came with the introduction of the complement dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) test in 1964 by Terasaki and McClelland. Since then, methods for antibody detection have evolved rema...
Saved in:
Superior document: | Frontiers Research Topics |
---|---|
: | |
Year of Publication: | 2017 |
Language: | English |
Series: | Frontiers Research Topics
|
Physical Description: | 1 electronic resource (176 p.) |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
id |
993546631404498 |
---|---|
ctrlnum |
(CKB)4100000000883868 (oapen)https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/40954 (EXLCZ)994100000000883868 |
collection |
bib_alma |
record_format |
marc |
spelling |
Ajay Kumar Baranwal auth Antibody Repertoire and Graft Outcome Following Solid Organ Transplantation Frontiers Media SA 2017 1 electronic resource (176 p.) text txt rdacontent computer c rdamedia online resource cr rdacarrier Frontiers Research Topics Open access Unrestricted online access star The first real major breakthrough that laid the basis of HLA antibody detection in the field of solid organ transplantation, came with the introduction of the complement dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) test in 1964 by Terasaki and McClelland. Since then, methods for antibody detection have evolved remarkably from conventional cell-based assays to the current advanced solid phase systems on the Luminex platform, with increasing degree of sensitivity and specificity. The latter have been indispensable for more accurate identification of donor specific HLA antibodies in broadly reactive allo antisera, and to guide donor selection and kidney paired exchange programs through virtual crossmatching, in addition to serving as excellent tools for initiating pre-transplant desensitization and post- transplant antibody monitoring. Consensus is evolving on the optimal routine employment of these methods in donor selection strategies along with an understanding of the clinical relevance of antibodies detected by each of them. The immunoassays based on the Luminex platform and flow cytometric beads are however unable to discriminate complement fixing from non-complement fixing HLA antibodies. This is important because the former are considered clinically more pertinent in the peri-transplant period. The C1q assay which is a modification of the solid phase assay based on Luminex single antigen beads, which can be used effectively to monitor high dose IVIG desensitization is essentially a surrogate complement fixing assay, retaining the exquisite sensitivity and specificity of the Luminex platform. Currently, information obtained from these assays is preliminary and much needs to be done to standardize technologies and set a consensus ‘MFI cut off’ for antibody positivity. Besides the overriding influence of anti-HLA antibodies on overall solid organ graft survival, immune response to non-HLA antigens has become a topic of substantial interest in recent years. An ever expanding list of non-HLA antigens has been implicated in graft rejection for various organs, of which the most noted are the Major Histocompatibility Complex class I chain-related molecule A (MICA), Vimentin, Myosin, Angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AT1R), Tubulin and Collagen. MICA is one of the most polymorphic and extensively studied non-HLA antigenic targets especially in renal transplantation. Although there are clear indications of MICA antibodies being associated with adverse graft outcome, to date a definitive consensus on this relationship has not been agreed. Because MICA molecules are not expressed constitutively on immunocompetent cells such as T and B lymphocytes, it is of utmost importance to address the impact of MICA donor specific antibodies (DSA) as compared to those that are non- donor specific (NDSA) on graft outcome. The soluble isoform of MICA molecule (sMICA) that is derived from the proteolytic shedding of membrane bound molecules has the potential to engage the NK-cell activating receptor NKG2D and down-regulate its expression. Consequent to the interaction of NKG2D by sMICA, the receptor ligand complex is endocytosed and degraded and thus suppresses NKG2D mediated lysis of the target by NK cells. Thus interaction between NKG2D and sMICA leads to expansion of immunosuppressive/anergic T cells thereby resulting in suppression of NKG2D mediated host innate immunity. These concept support the possible involvement of an immunosuppressive role for sMICA during allotransplantation as shown recently for heart transplantation. This research topic focuses on the clinical utility of investigating the complete antibody repertoire in solid organ transplantation. English HLA matching donor specific antibodies antibody mediated rejection B cell immunity Graft outcome solid organ transplantation non HLA antibodies MICA antibodies antibody subclass 2-88945-241-7 Narinder K. Mehra auth Brian D. Tait auth |
language |
English |
format |
eBook |
author |
Ajay Kumar Baranwal |
spellingShingle |
Ajay Kumar Baranwal Antibody Repertoire and Graft Outcome Following Solid Organ Transplantation Frontiers Research Topics |
author_facet |
Ajay Kumar Baranwal Narinder K. Mehra Brian D. Tait |
author_variant |
a k b akb |
author2 |
Narinder K. Mehra Brian D. Tait |
author2_variant |
n k m nkm b d t bdt |
author_sort |
Ajay Kumar Baranwal |
title |
Antibody Repertoire and Graft Outcome Following Solid Organ Transplantation |
title_full |
Antibody Repertoire and Graft Outcome Following Solid Organ Transplantation |
title_fullStr |
Antibody Repertoire and Graft Outcome Following Solid Organ Transplantation |
title_full_unstemmed |
Antibody Repertoire and Graft Outcome Following Solid Organ Transplantation |
title_auth |
Antibody Repertoire and Graft Outcome Following Solid Organ Transplantation |
title_new |
Antibody Repertoire and Graft Outcome Following Solid Organ Transplantation |
title_sort |
antibody repertoire and graft outcome following solid organ transplantation |
series |
Frontiers Research Topics |
series2 |
Frontiers Research Topics |
publisher |
Frontiers Media SA |
publishDate |
2017 |
physical |
1 electronic resource (176 p.) |
isbn |
2-88945-241-7 |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT ajaykumarbaranwal antibodyrepertoireandgraftoutcomefollowingsolidorgantransplantation AT narinderkmehra antibodyrepertoireandgraftoutcomefollowingsolidorgantransplantation AT briandtait antibodyrepertoireandgraftoutcomefollowingsolidorgantransplantation |
status_str |
n |
ids_txt_mv |
(CKB)4100000000883868 (oapen)https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/40954 (EXLCZ)994100000000883868 |
carrierType_str_mv |
cr |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Frontiers Research Topics |
is_hierarchy_title |
Antibody Repertoire and Graft Outcome Following Solid Organ Transplantation |
container_title |
Frontiers Research Topics |
author2_original_writing_str_mv |
noLinkedField noLinkedField |
_version_ |
1789038446266810368 |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>04976nam-a2200409z--4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">993546631404498</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20240124160036.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="006">m o d </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr|mn|---annan</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">202102s2017 xx |||||o ||| 0|eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(CKB)4100000000883868</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(oapen)https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/40954</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(EXLCZ)994100000000883868</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ajay Kumar Baranwal</subfield><subfield code="4">auth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Antibody Repertoire and Graft Outcome Following Solid Organ Transplantation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">Frontiers Media SA</subfield><subfield code="c">2017</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 electronic resource (176 p.)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">computer</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">online resource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Frontiers Research Topics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="506" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Open access</subfield><subfield code="f">Unrestricted online access</subfield><subfield code="2">star</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The first real major breakthrough that laid the basis of HLA antibody detection in the field of solid organ transplantation, came with the introduction of the complement dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) test in 1964 by Terasaki and McClelland. Since then, methods for antibody detection have evolved remarkably from conventional cell-based assays to the current advanced solid phase systems on the Luminex platform, with increasing degree of sensitivity and specificity. The latter have been indispensable for more accurate identification of donor specific HLA antibodies in broadly reactive allo antisera, and to guide donor selection and kidney paired exchange programs through virtual crossmatching, in addition to serving as excellent tools for initiating pre-transplant desensitization and post- transplant antibody monitoring. Consensus is evolving on the optimal routine employment of these methods in donor selection strategies along with an understanding of the clinical relevance of antibodies detected by each of them. The immunoassays based on the Luminex platform and flow cytometric beads are however unable to discriminate complement fixing from non-complement fixing HLA antibodies. This is important because the former are considered clinically more pertinent in the peri-transplant period. The C1q assay which is a modification of the solid phase assay based on Luminex single antigen beads, which can be used effectively to monitor high dose IVIG desensitization is essentially a surrogate complement fixing assay, retaining the exquisite sensitivity and specificity of the Luminex platform. Currently, information obtained from these assays is preliminary and much needs to be done to standardize technologies and set a consensus ‘MFI cut off’ for antibody positivity. Besides the overriding influence of anti-HLA antibodies on overall solid organ graft survival, immune response to non-HLA antigens has become a topic of substantial interest in recent years. An ever expanding list of non-HLA antigens has been implicated in graft rejection for various organs, of which the most noted are the Major Histocompatibility Complex class I chain-related molecule A (MICA), Vimentin, Myosin, Angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AT1R), Tubulin and Collagen. MICA is one of the most polymorphic and extensively studied non-HLA antigenic targets especially in renal transplantation. Although there are clear indications of MICA antibodies being associated with adverse graft outcome, to date a definitive consensus on this relationship has not been agreed. Because MICA molecules are not expressed constitutively on immunocompetent cells such as T and B lymphocytes, it is of utmost importance to address the impact of MICA donor specific antibodies (DSA) as compared to those that are non- donor specific (NDSA) on graft outcome. The soluble isoform of MICA molecule (sMICA) that is derived from the proteolytic shedding of membrane bound molecules has the potential to engage the NK-cell activating receptor NKG2D and down-regulate its expression. Consequent to the interaction of NKG2D by sMICA, the receptor ligand complex is endocytosed and degraded and thus suppresses NKG2D mediated lysis of the target by NK cells. Thus interaction between NKG2D and sMICA leads to expansion of immunosuppressive/anergic T cells thereby resulting in suppression of NKG2D mediated host innate immunity. These concept support the possible involvement of an immunosuppressive role for sMICA during allotransplantation as shown recently for heart transplantation. This research topic focuses on the clinical utility of investigating the complete antibody repertoire in solid organ transplantation.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="546" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">English</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">HLA matching</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">donor specific antibodies</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">antibody mediated rejection</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">B cell immunity</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Graft outcome</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">solid organ transplantation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">non HLA antibodies</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">MICA antibodies</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">antibody subclass</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="z">2-88945-241-7</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Narinder K. Mehra</subfield><subfield code="4">auth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Brian D. Tait</subfield><subfield code="4">auth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="906" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">BOOK</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="ADM" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">2024-01-25 02:20:44 Europe/Vienna</subfield><subfield code="f">system</subfield><subfield code="c">marc21</subfield><subfield code="a">2017-11-11 16:18:22 Europe/Vienna</subfield><subfield code="g">false</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="AVE" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="i">DOAB Directory of Open Access Books</subfield><subfield code="P">DOAB Directory of Open Access Books</subfield><subfield code="x">https://eu02.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/uresolver/43ACC_OEAW/openurl?u.ignore_date_coverage=true&portfolio_pid=5338321950004498&Force_direct=true</subfield><subfield code="Z">5338321950004498</subfield><subfield code="b">Available</subfield><subfield code="8">5338321950004498</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |