Quantum Structures in Cognitive and Social Science

Traditional approaches to cognitive psychology correspond with a classical view of logic and probability theory. More specifically, one typically assumes that cognitive processes of human thought are founded on the Boolean structures of classical logic, while the probabilistic aspects of these proce...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Superior document:Frontiers Research Topics
:
Year of Publication:2016
Language:English
Series:Frontiers Research Topics
Physical Description:1 electronic resource (168 p.)
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id 993546540104498
ctrlnum (CKB)3800000000216360
(oapen)https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/57456
(EXLCZ)993800000000216360
collection bib_alma
record_format marc
spelling Sandro Sozzo auth
Quantum Structures in Cognitive and Social Science
Frontiers Media SA 2016
1 electronic resource (168 p.)
text txt rdacontent
computer c rdamedia
online resource cr rdacarrier
Frontiers Research Topics
Traditional approaches to cognitive psychology correspond with a classical view of logic and probability theory. More specifically, one typically assumes that cognitive processes of human thought are founded on the Boolean structures of classical logic, while the probabilistic aspects of these processes are based on the Kolmogorovian structures of classical probability theory. However, growing experimental evidence indicates that the models founded on classical structures systematically fail when human decisions are at stake. These experimental deviations from classical behavior have been called `paradoxes’, `fallacies’, `effects’ or `contradictions’, depending on the specific situation where they appear. But, they involve a broad spectrum of cognitive and social science domains, ranging from conceptual combination to decision making under uncertainty, behavioral economics, and linguistics. This situation has constituted a serious drawback to the development of various disciplines, like cognitive science, linguistics, artificial intelligence, economic modeling and behavioral finance. A different approach to cognitive psychology, initiated two decades ago, has meanwhile matured into a new domain of research, called ‘quantum cognition’. Its main feature is the use of the mathematical formalism of quantum theory as modeling tool for these cognitive situations where traditional classically based approaches fail. Quantum cognition has recently attracted the interest of important journals and editing houses, academic and funding institutions, popular science and media. Specifically, within a quantum cognition approach, one assumes that human decisions do not necessarily obey the rules of Boolean logic and Kolmogorovian probability, and can on the contrary be modeled by the quantum-mechanical formalism. Different concrete quantum-theoretic models have meanwhile been developed that successfully represent the cognitive situations that are classically problematical, by explaining observed deviations from classicality in terms of genuine quantum effects, such as `contextuality’, `emergence’, `interference’, `superposition’, `entanglement’ and `indistinguishability’. In addition, the validity of these quantum models is convincingly confirmed by new experimental tests. We also stress that, since the use of a quantum-theoretic framework is mainly for modeling purposes, the identification of quantum structures in cognitive processes does not presuppose (without being incompatible with it) the existence of microscopic quantum processes in the human brain. In this Research Topic, we review the major achievements that have been obtained in quantum cognition, by providing an accurate picture of the state-of-the-art of this emerging discipline. Our overview does not pretend to be either complete or exhaustive. But, we aim to introduce psychologists and social scientists to this challenging new research area, encouraging them, at the same time, to consider its promising results. It is our opinion that, if continuous progress in this domain can be realized, quantum cognition can constitute an important breakthrough in cognitive psychology, and potentially open the way towards a new scientific paradigm in social science.
English
quantum structures
Quantum cognition paradigm
decision-making
social networks
Cognitive fallacies
mathematical modeling
human cognition
Human perception
2-88919-876-6
Jan Broekaert auth
Liane Gabora auth
Diederik Aerts auth
language English
format eBook
author Sandro Sozzo
spellingShingle Sandro Sozzo
Quantum Structures in Cognitive and Social Science
Frontiers Research Topics
author_facet Sandro Sozzo
Jan Broekaert
Liane Gabora
Diederik Aerts
author_variant s s ss
author2 Jan Broekaert
Liane Gabora
Diederik Aerts
author2_variant j b jb
l g lg
d a da
author_sort Sandro Sozzo
title Quantum Structures in Cognitive and Social Science
title_full Quantum Structures in Cognitive and Social Science
title_fullStr Quantum Structures in Cognitive and Social Science
title_full_unstemmed Quantum Structures in Cognitive and Social Science
title_auth Quantum Structures in Cognitive and Social Science
title_new Quantum Structures in Cognitive and Social Science
title_sort quantum structures in cognitive and social science
series Frontiers Research Topics
series2 Frontiers Research Topics
publisher Frontiers Media SA
publishDate 2016
physical 1 electronic resource (168 p.)
isbn 2-88919-876-6
illustrated Not Illustrated
work_keys_str_mv AT sandrosozzo quantumstructuresincognitiveandsocialscience
AT janbroekaert quantumstructuresincognitiveandsocialscience
AT lianegabora quantumstructuresincognitiveandsocialscience
AT diederikaerts quantumstructuresincognitiveandsocialscience
status_str n
ids_txt_mv (CKB)3800000000216360
(oapen)https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/57456
(EXLCZ)993800000000216360
carrierType_str_mv cr
hierarchy_parent_title Frontiers Research Topics
is_hierarchy_title Quantum Structures in Cognitive and Social Science
container_title Frontiers Research Topics
author2_original_writing_str_mv noLinkedField
noLinkedField
noLinkedField
_version_ 1787548717820149760
fullrecord <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>04513nam-a2200397z--4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">993546540104498</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20231214133423.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="006">m o d </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr|mn|---annan</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">202102s2016 xx |||||o ||| 0|eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(CKB)3800000000216360</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(oapen)https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/57456</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(EXLCZ)993800000000216360</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Sandro Sozzo</subfield><subfield code="4">auth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Quantum Structures in Cognitive and Social Science</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">Frontiers Media SA</subfield><subfield code="c">2016</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 electronic resource (168 p.)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">computer</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">online resource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Frontiers Research Topics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Traditional approaches to cognitive psychology correspond with a classical view of logic and probability theory. More specifically, one typically assumes that cognitive processes of human thought are founded on the Boolean structures of classical logic, while the probabilistic aspects of these processes are based on the Kolmogorovian structures of classical probability theory. However, growing experimental evidence indicates that the models founded on classical structures systematically fail when human decisions are at stake. These experimental deviations from classical behavior have been called `paradoxes’, `fallacies’, `effects’ or `contradictions’, depending on the specific situation where they appear. But, they involve a broad spectrum of cognitive and social science domains, ranging from conceptual combination to decision making under uncertainty, behavioral economics, and linguistics. This situation has constituted a serious drawback to the development of various disciplines, like cognitive science, linguistics, artificial intelligence, economic modeling and behavioral finance. A different approach to cognitive psychology, initiated two decades ago, has meanwhile matured into a new domain of research, called ‘quantum cognition’. Its main feature is the use of the mathematical formalism of quantum theory as modeling tool for these cognitive situations where traditional classically based approaches fail. Quantum cognition has recently attracted the interest of important journals and editing houses, academic and funding institutions, popular science and media. Specifically, within a quantum cognition approach, one assumes that human decisions do not necessarily obey the rules of Boolean logic and Kolmogorovian probability, and can on the contrary be modeled by the quantum-mechanical formalism. Different concrete quantum-theoretic models have meanwhile been developed that successfully represent the cognitive situations that are classically problematical, by explaining observed deviations from classicality in terms of genuine quantum effects, such as `contextuality’, `emergence’, `interference’, `superposition’, `entanglement’ and `indistinguishability’. In addition, the validity of these quantum models is convincingly confirmed by new experimental tests. We also stress that, since the use of a quantum-theoretic framework is mainly for modeling purposes, the identification of quantum structures in cognitive processes does not presuppose (without being incompatible with it) the existence of microscopic quantum processes in the human brain. In this Research Topic, we review the major achievements that have been obtained in quantum cognition, by providing an accurate picture of the state-of-the-art of this emerging discipline. Our overview does not pretend to be either complete or exhaustive. But, we aim to introduce psychologists and social scientists to this challenging new research area, encouraging them, at the same time, to consider its promising results. It is our opinion that, if continuous progress in this domain can be realized, quantum cognition can constitute an important breakthrough in cognitive psychology, and potentially open the way towards a new scientific paradigm in social science.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="546" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">English</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">quantum structures</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Quantum cognition paradigm</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">decision-making</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">social networks</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Cognitive fallacies</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">mathematical modeling</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">human cognition</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Human perception</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="z">2-88919-876-6</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Jan Broekaert</subfield><subfield code="4">auth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Liane Gabora</subfield><subfield code="4">auth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Diederik Aerts</subfield><subfield code="4">auth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="906" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">BOOK</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="ADM" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">2023-12-15 05:53:34 Europe/Vienna</subfield><subfield code="f">system</subfield><subfield code="c">marc21</subfield><subfield code="a">2017-09-30 19:47:25 Europe/Vienna</subfield><subfield code="g">false</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="AVE" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="i">DOAB Directory of Open Access Books</subfield><subfield code="P">DOAB Directory of Open Access Books</subfield><subfield code="x">https://eu02.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/uresolver/43ACC_OEAW/openurl?u.ignore_date_coverage=true&amp;portfolio_pid=5338274590004498&amp;Force_direct=true</subfield><subfield code="Z">5338274590004498</subfield><subfield code="b">Available</subfield><subfield code="8">5338274590004498</subfield></datafield></record></collection>