Examining the role of patent quality in large-scale "patent war" litigation : : a historical comparison and proposal for a restorative U.S. patent system / / Wael Zohni.
Although the U.S. Patent System has been essential to spurring innovation, it has wavered in its efficiency and effectiveness at doing so. This research first makes historical comparison and analysis of the Apple and Wright landmark patent war cases to illustrate that, irrespective of timing, benefi...
Saved in:
Superior document: | MIPLC Studies ; 31 |
---|---|
VerfasserIn: | |
Place / Publishing House: | Baden-Baden, Germany : : Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH,, 2018. |
Year of Publication: | 2018 |
Edition: | First edition. |
Language: | English |
Series: | MIPLC studies ;
31. |
Physical Description: | 1 online resource (78 pages). |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
id |
993546488204498 |
---|---|
ctrlnum |
(CKB)4100000005822209 (WaSeSS)IndRDA00124447 (oapen)https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/47164 (EXLCZ)994100000005822209 |
collection |
bib_alma |
record_format |
marc |
spelling |
Zohni, Wael, author. Examining the role of patent quality in large-scale "patent war" litigation : a historical comparison and proposal for a restorative U.S. patent system / Wael Zohni. First edition. Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG 2018 Baden-Baden, Germany : Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH, 2018. 1 online resource (78 pages). text txt rdacontent computer c rdamedia online resource cr rdacarrier MIPLC Studies ; 31 Includes bibliographical references. Description based on: online resource; title from pdf title page (JSTOR, viewed June 10, 2020). Although the U.S. Patent System has been essential to spurring innovation, it has wavered in its efficiency and effectiveness at doing so. This research first makes historical comparison and analysis of the Apple and Wright landmark patent war cases to illustrate that, irrespective of timing, benefits of a patent system rest heavily on how well it defines and maintains “patent quality.” Much of the challenge in maintaining such quality relates to the subjective and often uncertain nature of invention criteria such as “non-obviousness.” As shown by recent trends, decreased patent quality leads to greater uncertainty about patent validity, which in turn invites more litigation. This work proposes that, in order to improve constancy on patent quality, the U.S. patent office should consider returning to original strategies envisioned by the Founders of the United States as described by a patent-registration system that emphasizes utility and public review in governing the patent granting process. Modern information technology can now be applied to effectively restore this original framework envisioned for patent quality control systems. English Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode Unrestricted online access star Patent suits United States. Patent laws and legislation United States. Wright Patent Quality Historical Comparison USPTO history Curtiss Patent War Litigation Apple Historical Proposal patent prosecution Patent USPTO patent examination Samsung Restorative Patent System 3-8487-5107-0 MIPLC studies ; 31. |
language |
English |
format |
eBook |
author |
Zohni, Wael, |
spellingShingle |
Zohni, Wael, Examining the role of patent quality in large-scale "patent war" litigation : a historical comparison and proposal for a restorative U.S. patent system / MIPLC Studies ; |
author_facet |
Zohni, Wael, |
author_variant |
w z wz |
author_role |
VerfasserIn |
author_sort |
Zohni, Wael, |
title |
Examining the role of patent quality in large-scale "patent war" litigation : a historical comparison and proposal for a restorative U.S. patent system / |
title_sub |
a historical comparison and proposal for a restorative U.S. patent system / |
title_full |
Examining the role of patent quality in large-scale "patent war" litigation : a historical comparison and proposal for a restorative U.S. patent system / Wael Zohni. |
title_fullStr |
Examining the role of patent quality in large-scale "patent war" litigation : a historical comparison and proposal for a restorative U.S. patent system / Wael Zohni. |
title_full_unstemmed |
Examining the role of patent quality in large-scale "patent war" litigation : a historical comparison and proposal for a restorative U.S. patent system / Wael Zohni. |
title_auth |
Examining the role of patent quality in large-scale "patent war" litigation : a historical comparison and proposal for a restorative U.S. patent system / |
title_new |
Examining the role of patent quality in large-scale "patent war" litigation : |
title_sort |
examining the role of patent quality in large-scale "patent war" litigation : a historical comparison and proposal for a restorative u.s. patent system / |
series |
MIPLC Studies ; |
series2 |
MIPLC Studies ; |
publisher |
Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH, |
publishDate |
2018 |
physical |
1 online resource (78 pages). |
edition |
First edition. |
isbn |
3-8452-9309-8 3-8487-5107-0 |
callnumber-first |
K - Law |
callnumber-subject |
KF - United States |
callnumber-label |
KF3155 |
callnumber-sort |
KF 43155 Z646 42018 |
geographic_facet |
United States. |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
dewey-hundreds |
300 - Social sciences |
dewey-tens |
340 - Law |
dewey-ones |
346 - Private law |
dewey-full |
346.730486 |
dewey-sort |
3346.730486 |
dewey-raw |
346.730486 |
dewey-search |
346.730486 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT zohniwael examiningtheroleofpatentqualityinlargescalepatentwarlitigationahistoricalcomparisonandproposalforarestorativeuspatentsystem |
status_str |
n |
ids_txt_mv |
(CKB)4100000005822209 (WaSeSS)IndRDA00124447 (oapen)https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/47164 (EXLCZ)994100000005822209 |
carrierType_str_mv |
cr |
hierarchy_parent_title |
MIPLC Studies ; 31 |
hierarchy_sequence |
31. |
is_hierarchy_title |
Examining the role of patent quality in large-scale "patent war" litigation : a historical comparison and proposal for a restorative U.S. patent system / |
container_title |
MIPLC Studies ; 31 |
_version_ |
1797653505527250944 |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>03351nam a2200613 i 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">993546488204498</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20240424230056.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="006">m o d </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr |||||||||||</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">200611s2018 gw o 000 0 eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">3-8452-9309-8</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(CKB)4100000005822209</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(WaSeSS)IndRDA00124447</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(oapen)https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/47164</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(EXLCZ)994100000005822209</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">WaSeSS</subfield><subfield code="b">eng</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield><subfield code="c">WaSeSS</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="043" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">n-us---</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">KF3155</subfield><subfield code="b">.Z646 2018</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">346.730486</subfield><subfield code="2">23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Zohni, Wael,</subfield><subfield code="e">author.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Examining the role of patent quality in large-scale "patent war" litigation :</subfield><subfield code="b">a historical comparison and proposal for a restorative U.S. patent system /</subfield><subfield code="c">Wael Zohni.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="250" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">First edition.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG</subfield><subfield code="c">2018</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Baden-Baden, Germany :</subfield><subfield code="b">Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH,</subfield><subfield code="c">2018.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 online resource (78 pages).</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">computer</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">online resource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">MIPLC Studies ;</subfield><subfield code="v">31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="504" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Includes bibliographical references.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="588" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Description based on: online resource; title from pdf title page (JSTOR, viewed June 10, 2020).</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Although the U.S. Patent System has been essential to spurring innovation, it has wavered in its efficiency and effectiveness at doing so. This research first makes historical comparison and analysis of the Apple and Wright landmark patent war cases to illustrate that, irrespective of timing, benefits of a patent system rest heavily on how well it defines and maintains “patent quality.” Much of the challenge in maintaining such quality relates to the subjective and often uncertain nature of invention criteria such as “non-obviousness.” As shown by recent trends, decreased patent quality leads to greater uncertainty about patent validity, which in turn invites more litigation. This work proposes that, in order to improve constancy on patent quality, the U.S. patent office should consider returning to original strategies envisioned by the Founders of the United States as described by a patent-registration system that emphasizes utility and public review in governing the patent granting process. Modern information technology can now be applied to effectively restore this original framework envisioned for patent quality control systems.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="546" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">English</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International</subfield><subfield code="f">CC BY-NC-ND 4.0</subfield><subfield code="u">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="506" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="f">Unrestricted online access</subfield><subfield code="2">star</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Patent suits</subfield><subfield code="z">United States.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Patent laws and legislation</subfield><subfield code="z">United States.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Wright</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Patent Quality</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Historical Comparison</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">USPTO history</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Curtiss</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Patent War Litigation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Apple</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Historical Proposal</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">patent prosecution</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Patent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">USPTO</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">patent examination</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Samsung</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Restorative Patent System</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="z">3-8487-5107-0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="830" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">MIPLC studies ;</subfield><subfield code="v">31.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="906" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">BOOK</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="ADM" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">2024-04-26 03:04:29 Europe/Vienna</subfield><subfield code="f">system</subfield><subfield code="c">marc21</subfield><subfield code="a">2018-09-01 19:45:54 Europe/Vienna</subfield><subfield code="g">false</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="AVE" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="i">DOAB Directory of Open Access Books</subfield><subfield code="P">DOAB Directory of Open Access Books</subfield><subfield code="x">https://eu02.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/uresolver/43ACC_OEAW/openurl?u.ignore_date_coverage=true&portfolio_pid=5338208980004498&Force_direct=true</subfield><subfield code="Z">5338208980004498</subfield><subfield code="b">Available</subfield><subfield code="8">5338208980004498</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |