Examining the role of patent quality in large-scale "patent war" litigation : : a historical comparison and proposal for a restorative U.S. patent system / / Wael Zohni.

Although the U.S. Patent System has been essential to spurring innovation, it has wavered in its efficiency and effectiveness at doing so. This research first makes historical comparison and analysis of the Apple and Wright landmark patent war cases to illustrate that, irrespective of timing, benefi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Superior document:MIPLC Studies ; 31
VerfasserIn:
Place / Publishing House:Baden-Baden, Germany : : Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH,, 2018.
Year of Publication:2018
Edition:First edition.
Language:English
Series:MIPLC studies ; 31.
Physical Description:1 online resource (78 pages).
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id 993546488204498
ctrlnum (CKB)4100000005822209
(WaSeSS)IndRDA00124447
(oapen)https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/47164
(EXLCZ)994100000005822209
collection bib_alma
record_format marc
spelling Zohni, Wael, author.
Examining the role of patent quality in large-scale "patent war" litigation : a historical comparison and proposal for a restorative U.S. patent system / Wael Zohni.
First edition.
Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG 2018
Baden-Baden, Germany : Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH, 2018.
1 online resource (78 pages).
text txt rdacontent
computer c rdamedia
online resource cr rdacarrier
MIPLC Studies ; 31
Includes bibliographical references.
Description based on: online resource; title from pdf title page (JSTOR, viewed June 10, 2020).
Although the U.S. Patent System has been essential to spurring innovation, it has wavered in its efficiency and effectiveness at doing so. This research first makes historical comparison and analysis of the Apple and Wright landmark patent war cases to illustrate that, irrespective of timing, benefits of a patent system rest heavily on how well it defines and maintains “patent quality.” Much of the challenge in maintaining such quality relates to the subjective and often uncertain nature of invention criteria such as “non-obviousness.” As shown by recent trends, decreased patent quality leads to greater uncertainty about patent validity, which in turn invites more litigation. This work proposes that, in order to improve constancy on patent quality, the U.S. patent office should consider returning to original strategies envisioned by the Founders of the United States as described by a patent-registration system that emphasizes utility and public review in governing the patent granting process. Modern information technology can now be applied to effectively restore this original framework envisioned for patent quality control systems.
English
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode
Unrestricted online access star
Patent suits United States.
Patent laws and legislation United States.
Wright
Patent Quality
Historical Comparison
USPTO history
Curtiss
Patent War Litigation
Apple
Historical Proposal
patent prosecution
Patent
USPTO
patent examination
Samsung
Restorative Patent System
3-8487-5107-0
MIPLC studies ; 31.
language English
format eBook
author Zohni, Wael,
spellingShingle Zohni, Wael,
Examining the role of patent quality in large-scale "patent war" litigation : a historical comparison and proposal for a restorative U.S. patent system /
MIPLC Studies ;
author_facet Zohni, Wael,
author_variant w z wz
author_role VerfasserIn
author_sort Zohni, Wael,
title Examining the role of patent quality in large-scale "patent war" litigation : a historical comparison and proposal for a restorative U.S. patent system /
title_sub a historical comparison and proposal for a restorative U.S. patent system /
title_full Examining the role of patent quality in large-scale "patent war" litigation : a historical comparison and proposal for a restorative U.S. patent system / Wael Zohni.
title_fullStr Examining the role of patent quality in large-scale "patent war" litigation : a historical comparison and proposal for a restorative U.S. patent system / Wael Zohni.
title_full_unstemmed Examining the role of patent quality in large-scale "patent war" litigation : a historical comparison and proposal for a restorative U.S. patent system / Wael Zohni.
title_auth Examining the role of patent quality in large-scale "patent war" litigation : a historical comparison and proposal for a restorative U.S. patent system /
title_new Examining the role of patent quality in large-scale "patent war" litigation :
title_sort examining the role of patent quality in large-scale "patent war" litigation : a historical comparison and proposal for a restorative u.s. patent system /
series MIPLC Studies ;
series2 MIPLC Studies ;
publisher Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG
Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH,
publishDate 2018
physical 1 online resource (78 pages).
edition First edition.
isbn 3-8452-9309-8
3-8487-5107-0
callnumber-first K - Law
callnumber-subject KF - United States
callnumber-label KF3155
callnumber-sort KF 43155 Z646 42018
geographic_facet United States.
illustrated Not Illustrated
dewey-hundreds 300 - Social sciences
dewey-tens 340 - Law
dewey-ones 346 - Private law
dewey-full 346.730486
dewey-sort 3346.730486
dewey-raw 346.730486
dewey-search 346.730486
work_keys_str_mv AT zohniwael examiningtheroleofpatentqualityinlargescalepatentwarlitigationahistoricalcomparisonandproposalforarestorativeuspatentsystem
status_str n
ids_txt_mv (CKB)4100000005822209
(WaSeSS)IndRDA00124447
(oapen)https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/47164
(EXLCZ)994100000005822209
carrierType_str_mv cr
hierarchy_parent_title MIPLC Studies ; 31
hierarchy_sequence 31.
is_hierarchy_title Examining the role of patent quality in large-scale "patent war" litigation : a historical comparison and proposal for a restorative U.S. patent system /
container_title MIPLC Studies ; 31
_version_ 1797653505527250944
fullrecord <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>03351nam a2200613 i 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">993546488204498</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20240424230056.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="006">m o d </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr |||||||||||</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">200611s2018 gw o 000 0 eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">3-8452-9309-8</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(CKB)4100000005822209</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(WaSeSS)IndRDA00124447</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(oapen)https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/47164</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(EXLCZ)994100000005822209</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">WaSeSS</subfield><subfield code="b">eng</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield><subfield code="c">WaSeSS</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="043" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">n-us---</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">KF3155</subfield><subfield code="b">.Z646 2018</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">346.730486</subfield><subfield code="2">23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Zohni, Wael,</subfield><subfield code="e">author.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Examining the role of patent quality in large-scale "patent war" litigation :</subfield><subfield code="b">a historical comparison and proposal for a restorative U.S. patent system /</subfield><subfield code="c">Wael Zohni.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="250" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">First edition.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH &amp; Co. KG</subfield><subfield code="c">2018</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Baden-Baden, Germany :</subfield><subfield code="b">Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH,</subfield><subfield code="c">2018.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 online resource (78 pages).</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">computer</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">online resource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">MIPLC Studies ;</subfield><subfield code="v">31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="504" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Includes bibliographical references.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="588" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Description based on: online resource; title from pdf title page (JSTOR, viewed June 10, 2020).</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Although the U.S. Patent System has been essential to spurring innovation, it has wavered in its efficiency and effectiveness at doing so. This research first makes historical comparison and analysis of the Apple and Wright landmark patent war cases to illustrate that, irrespective of timing, benefits of a patent system rest heavily on how well it defines and maintains “patent quality.” Much of the challenge in maintaining such quality relates to the subjective and often uncertain nature of invention criteria such as “non-obviousness.” As shown by recent trends, decreased patent quality leads to greater uncertainty about patent validity, which in turn invites more litigation. This work proposes that, in order to improve constancy on patent quality, the U.S. patent office should consider returning to original strategies envisioned by the Founders of the United States as described by a patent-registration system that emphasizes utility and public review in governing the patent granting process. Modern information technology can now be applied to effectively restore this original framework envisioned for patent quality control systems.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="546" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">English</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International</subfield><subfield code="f">CC BY-NC-ND 4.0</subfield><subfield code="u">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="506" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="f">Unrestricted online access</subfield><subfield code="2">star</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Patent suits</subfield><subfield code="z">United States.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Patent laws and legislation</subfield><subfield code="z">United States.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Wright</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Patent Quality</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Historical Comparison</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">USPTO history</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Curtiss</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Patent War Litigation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Apple</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Historical Proposal</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">patent prosecution</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Patent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">USPTO</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">patent examination</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Samsung</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Restorative Patent System</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="z">3-8487-5107-0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="830" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">MIPLC studies ;</subfield><subfield code="v">31.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="906" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">BOOK</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="ADM" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">2024-04-26 03:04:29 Europe/Vienna</subfield><subfield code="f">system</subfield><subfield code="c">marc21</subfield><subfield code="a">2018-09-01 19:45:54 Europe/Vienna</subfield><subfield code="g">false</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="AVE" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="i">DOAB Directory of Open Access Books</subfield><subfield code="P">DOAB Directory of Open Access Books</subfield><subfield code="x">https://eu02.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/uresolver/43ACC_OEAW/openurl?u.ignore_date_coverage=true&amp;portfolio_pid=5338208980004498&amp;Force_direct=true</subfield><subfield code="Z">5338208980004498</subfield><subfield code="b">Available</subfield><subfield code="8">5338208980004498</subfield></datafield></record></collection>