Amicus Curiae before international courts and tribunals / / Astrid Wiik.
Amicus curiae participation in international courts is steadily growing since the late 1990 despite lack of clarity on the concept's nature, function and utility in international dispute settlement. Does amicus curiae infuse international judicial proceedings with alternative views, including t...
Saved in:
Superior document: | Successful dispute resolution ; Volume 4 |
---|---|
VerfasserIn: | |
Place / Publishing House: | Baden-Baden, Germany : : Hart Publishing :, Nomos,, [2018] ©2018 |
Year of Publication: | 2018 |
Language: | English |
Series: | Successful dispute resolution ;
Volume 4. |
Physical Description: | 1 online resource (734 pages). |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
id |
993546472904498 |
---|---|
ctrlnum |
(CKB)4100000005821988 (MiAaPQ)EBC5519151 (ScCtBLL)59c60cbd-a31d-4572-b607-86b310ac980b (oapen)https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/29549 (EXLCZ)994100000005821988 |
collection |
bib_alma |
record_format |
marc |
spelling |
Wiik, Astrid, author. Amicus Curiae before international courts and tribunals / Astrid Wiik. 2018 Baden-Baden, Germany : Hart Publishing : Nomos, [2018] ©2018 1 online resource (734 pages). text txt rdacontent computer c rdamedia online resource cr rdacarrier Successful dispute resolution ; Volume 4 Description based on print version record. Open access Unrestricted online access star Amicus curiae participation in international courts is steadily growing since the late 1990 despite lack of clarity on the concept's nature, function and utility in international dispute settlement. Does amicus curiae infuse international judicial proceedings with alternative views, including the public interest in a case, as often advocated by NGOs? Does it increase the legitimacy and transparency of international dispute settlement, or the coherence of international law? Or is it an unhelpful impostor that impedes negotiated solutions and derails the proceedings at the expense of the parties to advance its own agenda? By way of an empirical-comparative analysis of the laws and practices of the ICJ, the ITLOS, the ECtHR, the IACtHR, the IACtHPR, WTO panels and the Appellate Body, and investment arbitration the dissertation examines the status quo of amicus curiae before international courts and tribunals to determine if the current amicus curiae practice is of added value to international proceedings and international dispute settlement in general. The dissertation shows that there is no common concept of international amicus curiae, but that amicus curiae before the international courts examined share a few characteristics. A proposed functional systematization highlights overlaps and diverging uses of the concept before international courts and helps scholars and practitioners to assess the opportunities and limits of the concept. Analysis of the concept's current regulatory framework and its substantive effectiveness reveals a hesitation in particular by courts with a strong adversarial tradition to take into account the views of a non-party despite the positive experience with the concept in regional human rights courts. The dissertation concludes that neither the expectations nor the concerns attached to amicus curiae participation in international proceedings have materialized. It argues that the concept can contribute to improved decisions and decision-making in international dispute settlement if regulated and used properly. CC BY-NC-ND English Knowledge Unlatched Amici curiae. International courts Rules and practice. Law General 3-8487-3240-8 Successful dispute resolution ; Volume 4. |
language |
English |
format |
eBook |
author |
Wiik, Astrid, |
spellingShingle |
Wiik, Astrid, Amicus Curiae before international courts and tribunals / Successful dispute resolution ; |
author_facet |
Wiik, Astrid, |
author_variant |
a w aw |
author_role |
VerfasserIn |
author_sort |
Wiik, Astrid, |
title |
Amicus Curiae before international courts and tribunals / |
title_full |
Amicus Curiae before international courts and tribunals / Astrid Wiik. |
title_fullStr |
Amicus Curiae before international courts and tribunals / Astrid Wiik. |
title_full_unstemmed |
Amicus Curiae before international courts and tribunals / Astrid Wiik. |
title_auth |
Amicus Curiae before international courts and tribunals / |
title_new |
Amicus Curiae before international courts and tribunals / |
title_sort |
amicus curiae before international courts and tribunals / |
series |
Successful dispute resolution ; |
series2 |
Successful dispute resolution ; |
publisher |
Hart Publishing : Nomos, |
publishDate |
2018 |
physical |
1 online resource (734 pages). |
isbn |
3-8452-7592-8 9781509908929 3-8487-3240-8 |
callnumber-first |
K - Law |
callnumber-subject |
K - General Law |
callnumber-label |
K2240 |
callnumber-sort |
K 42240 W555 42018 |
genre_facet |
Rules and practice. |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
dewey-hundreds |
300 - Social sciences |
dewey-tens |
340 - Law |
dewey-ones |
347 - Civil procedure & courts |
dewey-full |
347.01 |
dewey-sort |
3347.01 |
dewey-raw |
347.01 |
dewey-search |
347.01 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT wiikastrid amicuscuriaebeforeinternationalcourtsandtribunals |
status_str |
n |
ids_txt_mv |
(CKB)4100000005821988 (MiAaPQ)EBC5519151 (ScCtBLL)59c60cbd-a31d-4572-b607-86b310ac980b (oapen)https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/29549 (EXLCZ)994100000005821988 |
carrierType_str_mv |
cr |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Successful dispute resolution ; Volume 4 |
hierarchy_sequence |
Volume 4. |
is_hierarchy_title |
Amicus Curiae before international courts and tribunals / |
container_title |
Successful dispute resolution ; Volume 4 |
_version_ |
1796652246063120384 |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>03674nam a2200493 i 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">993546472904498</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20231128205301.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="006">m o d | </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr#cnu||||||||</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">181011s2018 gw o 000 0 eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">3-8452-7592-8</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9781509908929</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="024" ind1="8" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">https://doi.org/10.5771/9783845275925</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(CKB)4100000005821988</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(MiAaPQ)EBC5519151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ScCtBLL)59c60cbd-a31d-4572-b607-86b310ac980b</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(oapen)https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/29549</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(EXLCZ)994100000005821988</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">MiAaPQ</subfield><subfield code="b">eng</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield><subfield code="e">pn</subfield><subfield code="c">MiAaPQ</subfield><subfield code="d">MiAaPQ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">K2240</subfield><subfield code="b">.W555 2018</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">347.01</subfield><subfield code="2">23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Wiik, Astrid,</subfield><subfield code="e">author.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Amicus Curiae before international courts and tribunals /</subfield><subfield code="c">Astrid Wiik.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="c">2018</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Baden-Baden, Germany :</subfield><subfield code="b">Hart Publishing :</subfield><subfield code="b">Nomos,</subfield><subfield code="c">[2018]</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="c">©2018</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 online resource (734 pages).</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">computer</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">online resource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Successful dispute resolution ;</subfield><subfield code="v">Volume 4</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="588" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Description based on print version record.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="506" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Open access</subfield><subfield code="f">Unrestricted online access</subfield><subfield code="2">star</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Amicus curiae participation in international courts is steadily growing since the late 1990 despite lack of clarity on the concept's nature, function and utility in international dispute settlement. Does amicus curiae infuse international judicial proceedings with alternative views, including the public interest in a case, as often advocated by NGOs? Does it increase the legitimacy and transparency of international dispute settlement, or the coherence of international law? Or is it an unhelpful impostor that impedes negotiated solutions and derails the proceedings at the expense of the parties to advance its own agenda? By way of an empirical-comparative analysis of the laws and practices of the ICJ, the ITLOS, the ECtHR, the IACtHR, the IACtHPR, WTO panels and the Appellate Body, and investment arbitration the dissertation examines the status quo of amicus curiae before international courts and tribunals to determine if the current amicus curiae practice is of added value to international proceedings and international dispute settlement in general. The dissertation shows that there is no common concept of international amicus curiae, but that amicus curiae before the international courts examined share a few characteristics. A proposed functional systematization highlights overlaps and diverging uses of the concept before international courts and helps scholars and practitioners to assess the opportunities and limits of the concept. Analysis of the concept's current regulatory framework and its substantive effectiveness reveals a hesitation in particular by courts with a strong adversarial tradition to take into account the views of a non-party despite the positive experience with the concept in regional human rights courts. The dissertation concludes that neither the expectations nor the concerns attached to amicus curiae participation in international proceedings have materialized. It argues that the concept can contribute to improved decisions and decision-making in international dispute settlement if regulated and used properly.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="f">CC BY-NC-ND</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="546" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">English</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="536" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Knowledge Unlatched</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Amici curiae.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">International courts</subfield><subfield code="v">Rules and practice.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Law</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">General</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="z">3-8487-3240-8</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="830" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Successful dispute resolution ;</subfield><subfield code="v">Volume 4.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="906" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">BOOK</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="ADM" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">2023-11-29 05:18:13 Europe/Vienna</subfield><subfield code="d">00</subfield><subfield code="f">system</subfield><subfield code="c">marc21</subfield><subfield code="a">2018-09-01 19:45:54 Europe/Vienna</subfield><subfield code="g">false</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="AVE" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="i">DOAB Directory of Open Access Books</subfield><subfield code="P">DOAB Directory of Open Access Books</subfield><subfield code="x">https://eu02.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/uresolver/43ACC_OEAW/openurl?u.ignore_date_coverage=true&portfolio_pid=5338254390004498&Force_direct=true</subfield><subfield code="Z">5338254390004498</subfield><subfield code="b">Available</subfield><subfield code="8">5338254390004498</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |