The great debate : : general ability and specific abilities in the prediction of important outcomes / / special issue editors, Harrison J. Kell and Jonas W.B. Lang.
There are many different theories of intelligence. Although these theories differ in their nuances, nearly all agree that there are multiple cognitive abilities and that they differ in the breadth of content they are typically associated with. There is much less agreement about the relative importan...
Saved in:
TeilnehmendeR: | |
---|---|
Year of Publication: | 2019 |
Language: | English |
Physical Description: | 1 electronic resource (108 p.) |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
id |
993544388204498 |
---|---|
ctrlnum |
(CKB)4920000000094994 (oapen)https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/48877 (EXLCZ)994920000000094994 |
collection |
bib_alma |
record_format |
marc |
spelling |
The great debate : general ability and specific abilities in the prediction of important outcomes / special issue editors, Harrison J. Kell and Jonas W.B. Lang. Great Debate MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute 2019 1 electronic resource (108 p.) text txt rdacontent computer c rdamedia online resource cr rdacarrier There are many different theories of intelligence. Although these theories differ in their nuances, nearly all agree that there are multiple cognitive abilities and that they differ in the breadth of content they are typically associated with. There is much less agreement about the relative importance of cognitive abilities of differing generality for predicting important real-world outcomes, such as educational achievement, career success, job performance, and health. Some investigators believe that narrower abilities hold little predictive power once general abilities have been accounted for. Other investigators contend that specific abilities are often as—or even more—effective in forecasting many practical variables as general abilities. These disagreements often turn on differences of theory and methodology that are both subtle and complex. The five cutting-edge contributions in this volume, both empirical and theoretical, advance the conversation in this vigorous, and highly important, scientific debate. English Description based on online resource; title from PDF title page (MDPI WWW site, viewed June 04, 2020). Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode Unrestricted online access star general cognitive ability second stratum abilities narrow abilities cognitive abilities ability tilt identification occupational attainment scholastic performance longevity non-g residuals specific abilities higher-order factor model bifactor model intelligence general intelligence (g) specific factors academic achievement hierarchical factor model educational attainment nested-factor models ability differentiation general abilities relative importance relative importance analysis bifactor(S-1) model subscores g-factor school grades non-g factors nested-factors model general mental ability cognitive tests specific cognitive abilities curvilinear relations specific ability situational specificity predictor-criterion bandwidth alignment job performance health machine learning academic performance general factor Intelligence. Forecasting. 3-03921-167-6 Kell, Harrison J., editor. Lang, Jonas W.B., editor. Religions (an Open Access Journal) 2079-3200. |
language |
English |
format |
eBook |
author2 |
Kell, Harrison J., Lang, Jonas W.B., |
author_facet |
Kell, Harrison J., Lang, Jonas W.B., |
author2_variant |
h j k hj hjk j w l jw jwl |
author2_role |
TeilnehmendeR TeilnehmendeR |
title |
The great debate : general ability and specific abilities in the prediction of important outcomes / |
spellingShingle |
The great debate : general ability and specific abilities in the prediction of important outcomes / |
title_sub |
general ability and specific abilities in the prediction of important outcomes / |
title_full |
The great debate : general ability and specific abilities in the prediction of important outcomes / special issue editors, Harrison J. Kell and Jonas W.B. Lang. |
title_fullStr |
The great debate : general ability and specific abilities in the prediction of important outcomes / special issue editors, Harrison J. Kell and Jonas W.B. Lang. |
title_full_unstemmed |
The great debate : general ability and specific abilities in the prediction of important outcomes / special issue editors, Harrison J. Kell and Jonas W.B. Lang. |
title_auth |
The great debate : general ability and specific abilities in the prediction of important outcomes / |
title_alt |
Great Debate Religions (an Open Access Journal) |
title_new |
The great debate : |
title_sort |
the great debate : general ability and specific abilities in the prediction of important outcomes / |
publisher |
MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute |
publishDate |
2019 |
physical |
1 electronic resource (108 p.) |
isbn |
3-03921-168-4 3-03921-167-6 |
issn |
2079-3200. |
callnumber-first |
B - Philosophy, Psychology, Religion |
callnumber-subject |
BF - Psychology |
callnumber-label |
BF431 |
callnumber-sort |
BF 3431 |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
dewey-hundreds |
100 - Philosophy & psychology |
dewey-tens |
150 - Psychology |
dewey-ones |
153 - Mental processes & intelligence |
dewey-full |
153.9 |
dewey-sort |
3153.9 |
dewey-raw |
153.9 |
dewey-search |
153.9 |
work_keys_str_mv |
UT religionsanopenaccessjournal AT kellharrisonj thegreatdebategeneralabilityandspecificabilitiesinthepredictionofimportantoutcomes AT langjonaswb thegreatdebategeneralabilityandspecificabilitiesinthepredictionofimportantoutcomes AT kellharrisonj greatdebate AT langjonaswb greatdebate AT kellharrisonj greatdebategeneralabilityandspecificabilitiesinthepredictionofimportantoutcomes AT langjonaswb greatdebategeneralabilityandspecificabilitiesinthepredictionofimportantoutcomes |
status_str |
n |
ids_txt_mv |
(CKB)4920000000094994 (oapen)https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/48877 (EXLCZ)994920000000094994 |
carrierType_str_mv |
cr |
is_hierarchy_title |
The great debate : general ability and specific abilities in the prediction of important outcomes / |
author2_original_writing_str_mv |
noLinkedField noLinkedField |
_version_ |
1797653522140889088 |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>04038nam-a2200889z--4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">993544388204498</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20240424230120.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="006">m o d </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr|mn|---annan</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">202102s2019 xx |||||o ||| 0|eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">3-03921-168-4</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(CKB)4920000000094994</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(oapen)https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/48877</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(EXLCZ)994920000000094994</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">BF431</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">153.9</subfield><subfield code="2">23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">The great debate :</subfield><subfield code="b">general ability and specific abilities in the prediction of important outcomes /</subfield><subfield code="c">special issue editors, Harrison J. Kell and Jonas W.B. Lang.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="246" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Great Debate</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</subfield><subfield code="c">2019</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 electronic resource (108 p.)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">computer</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">online resource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">There are many different theories of intelligence. Although these theories differ in their nuances, nearly all agree that there are multiple cognitive abilities and that they differ in the breadth of content they are typically associated with. There is much less agreement about the relative importance of cognitive abilities of differing generality for predicting important real-world outcomes, such as educational achievement, career success, job performance, and health. Some investigators believe that narrower abilities hold little predictive power once general abilities have been accounted for. Other investigators contend that specific abilities are often as—or even more—effective in forecasting many practical variables as general abilities. These disagreements often turn on differences of theory and methodology that are both subtle and complex. The five cutting-edge contributions in this volume, both empirical and theoretical, advance the conversation in this vigorous, and highly important, scientific debate.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="546" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">English</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="588" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Description based on online resource; title from PDF title page (MDPI WWW site, viewed June 04, 2020).</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International</subfield><subfield code="f">CC BY-NC-ND 4.0</subfield><subfield code="u">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="506" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="f">Unrestricted online access</subfield><subfield code="2">star</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">general cognitive ability</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">second stratum abilities</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">narrow abilities</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">cognitive abilities</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ability tilt</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">identification</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">occupational attainment</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">scholastic performance</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">longevity</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">non-g residuals</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">specific abilities</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">higher-order factor model</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">bifactor model</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">intelligence</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">general intelligence (g)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">specific factors</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">academic achievement</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">hierarchical factor model</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">educational attainment</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nested-factor models</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ability differentiation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">general abilities</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">relative importance</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">relative importance analysis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">bifactor(S-1) model</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">subscores</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">g-factor</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">school grades</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">non-g factors</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nested-factors model</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">general mental ability</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">cognitive tests</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">specific cognitive abilities</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">curvilinear relations</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">specific ability</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">situational specificity</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">predictor-criterion bandwidth alignment</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">job performance</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">health</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">machine learning</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">academic performance</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">general factor</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Intelligence.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Forecasting.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="z">3-03921-167-6</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Kell, Harrison J.,</subfield><subfield code="e">editor.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Lang, Jonas W.B.,</subfield><subfield code="e">editor.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="730" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Religions (an Open Access Journal)</subfield><subfield code="x">2079-3200.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="906" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">BOOK</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="ADM" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">2024-04-26 03:05:48 Europe/Vienna</subfield><subfield code="f">system</subfield><subfield code="c">marc21</subfield><subfield code="a">2019-11-10 04:18:40 Europe/Vienna</subfield><subfield code="g">false</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="AVE" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="i">DOAB Directory of Open Access Books</subfield><subfield code="P">DOAB Directory of Open Access Books</subfield><subfield code="x">https://eu02.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/uresolver/43ACC_OEAW/openurl?u.ignore_date_coverage=true&portfolio_pid=5337579030004498&Force_direct=true</subfield><subfield code="Z">5337579030004498</subfield><subfield code="b">Available</subfield><subfield code="8">5337579030004498</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |