Deceptive Conducts before the Patent Office : Challenges for Patent Law and Competition Law
In an increasingly harmonized global patent landscape, few issues still distinguish the US patent system as much as its strict–and often criticized–duty of candor and its inequitable conduct doctrine. The EPO and most other countries around the world impose less burdensome disclosure duties upon pat...
Saved in:
Superior document: | Munich Intellectual Property Law Center – MIPLC |
---|---|
: | |
Year of Publication: | 2019 |
Language: | English |
Series: | Munich Intellectual Property Law Center – MIPLC
|
Physical Description: | 1 electronic resource (335 p.) |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
id |
993543738204498 |
---|---|
ctrlnum |
(CKB)4920000000095310 (oapen)https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/44600 (EXLCZ)994920000000095310 |
collection |
bib_alma |
record_format |
marc |
spelling |
Hoss, Eugenio auth Deceptive Conducts before the Patent Office Challenges for Patent Law and Competition Law Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG 2019 1 electronic resource (335 p.) text txt rdacontent computer c rdamedia online resource cr rdacarrier Munich Intellectual Property Law Center – MIPLC In an increasingly harmonized global patent landscape, few issues still distinguish the US patent system as much as its strict–and often criticized–duty of candor and its inequitable conduct doctrine. The EPO and most other countries around the world impose less burdensome disclosure duties upon patent applicants. What is there to learn from the experience in the US? Have these tools resulted in any benefit worth considering? Yet regardless of the disclosure duties imposed upon patent applicants, a deceptive conduct before the Patent Office could lead to unwarranted exclusive rights and have a negative impact on competition. Should antitrust law intervene? Is it a case of sham litigation? This work attempts to answer those questions through a comparative analysis, examining the law and case law in the US and in the EU from both a patent and a competition law perspective and seeking a workable theory of harm. English pharmazeutischer Patient irreführendes Verhalten Wettbewerbsrecht Patentanmeldung Patentamt high court Supreme Court inequitable conduct Competition Law kristalline Form Patentrecht Apotex Walker Process tert-Butylaminsalz duty of candor Fraud before the Patent Office Perindopril Scheincharakter AstraZeneca Patent Office Servier LJ Jacob patent law 3-8487-6134-3 3-7489-0257-3 |
language |
English |
format |
eBook |
author |
Hoss, Eugenio |
spellingShingle |
Hoss, Eugenio Deceptive Conducts before the Patent Office Challenges for Patent Law and Competition Law Munich Intellectual Property Law Center – MIPLC |
author_facet |
Hoss, Eugenio |
author_variant |
e h eh |
author_sort |
Hoss, Eugenio |
title |
Deceptive Conducts before the Patent Office Challenges for Patent Law and Competition Law |
title_sub |
Challenges for Patent Law and Competition Law |
title_full |
Deceptive Conducts before the Patent Office Challenges for Patent Law and Competition Law |
title_fullStr |
Deceptive Conducts before the Patent Office Challenges for Patent Law and Competition Law |
title_full_unstemmed |
Deceptive Conducts before the Patent Office Challenges for Patent Law and Competition Law |
title_auth |
Deceptive Conducts before the Patent Office Challenges for Patent Law and Competition Law |
title_new |
Deceptive Conducts before the Patent Office |
title_sort |
deceptive conducts before the patent office challenges for patent law and competition law |
series |
Munich Intellectual Property Law Center – MIPLC |
series2 |
Munich Intellectual Property Law Center – MIPLC |
publisher |
Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG |
publishDate |
2019 |
physical |
1 electronic resource (335 p.) |
isbn |
3-8487-6134-3 3-7489-0257-3 |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT hosseugenio deceptiveconductsbeforethepatentofficechallengesforpatentlawandcompetitionlaw |
status_str |
n |
ids_txt_mv |
(CKB)4920000000095310 (oapen)https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/44600 (EXLCZ)994920000000095310 |
carrierType_str_mv |
cr |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Munich Intellectual Property Law Center – MIPLC |
is_hierarchy_title |
Deceptive Conducts before the Patent Office Challenges for Patent Law and Competition Law |
container_title |
Munich Intellectual Property Law Center – MIPLC |
_version_ |
1796652263758888960 |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>02564nam-a2200553z--4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">993543738204498</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20231214133456.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="006">m o d </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr|mn|---annan</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">202102s2019 xx |||||o ||| 0|eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(CKB)4920000000095310</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(oapen)https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/44600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(EXLCZ)994920000000095310</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Hoss, Eugenio</subfield><subfield code="4">auth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Deceptive Conducts before the Patent Office</subfield><subfield code="b">Challenges for Patent Law and Competition Law</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG</subfield><subfield code="c">2019</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 electronic resource (335 p.)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">computer</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">online resource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Munich Intellectual Property Law Center – MIPLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">In an increasingly harmonized global patent landscape, few issues still distinguish the US patent system as much as its strict–and often criticized–duty of candor and its inequitable conduct doctrine. The EPO and most other countries around the world impose less burdensome disclosure duties upon patent applicants. What is there to learn from the experience in the US? Have these tools resulted in any benefit worth considering? Yet regardless of the disclosure duties imposed upon patent applicants, a deceptive conduct before the Patent Office could lead to unwarranted exclusive rights and have a negative impact on competition. Should antitrust law intervene? Is it a case of sham litigation? This work attempts to answer those questions through a comparative analysis, examining the law and case law in the US and in the EU from both a patent and a competition law perspective and seeking a workable theory of harm.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="546" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">English</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">pharmazeutischer Patient</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">irreführendes Verhalten</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Wettbewerbsrecht</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Patentanmeldung</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Patentamt</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">high court</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Supreme Court</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">inequitable conduct</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Competition Law</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">kristalline Form</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Patentrecht</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Apotex</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Walker Process</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">tert-Butylaminsalz</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">duty of candor</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Fraud before the Patent Office</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Perindopril</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Scheincharakter</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AstraZeneca</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Patent Office</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Servier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">LJ Jacob</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">patent law</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="z">3-8487-6134-3</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="z">3-7489-0257-3</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="906" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">BOOK</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="ADM" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">2023-12-15 05:55:13 Europe/Vienna</subfield><subfield code="d">00</subfield><subfield code="f">system</subfield><subfield code="c">marc21</subfield><subfield code="a">2019-11-10 04:18:40 Europe/Vienna</subfield><subfield code="g">false</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="AVE" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="i">DOAB Directory of Open Access Books</subfield><subfield code="P">DOAB Directory of Open Access Books</subfield><subfield code="x">https://eu02.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/uresolver/43ACC_OEAW/openurl?u.ignore_date_coverage=true&portfolio_pid=5337434050004498&Force_direct=true</subfield><subfield code="Z">5337434050004498</subfield><subfield code="b">Available</subfield><subfield code="8">5337434050004498</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |