How Do Emotions and Feelings Regulate Physical Activity?

Up to date the scientific discussion about how frequency and regularity of physical activity can be increased is dominated by social-cognitive models. However, increasing evidence suggests that emotions and feelings have greater influence on physical activity than originally assumed (Rhodes, Fiala,...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Superior document:Frontiers Research Topics
:
Year of Publication:2017
Language:English
Series:Frontiers Research Topics
Physical Description:1 electronic resource (149 p.)
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
LEADER 04254nam-a2200397z--4500
001 993543520904498
005 20231214133301.0
006 m o d
007 cr|mn|---annan
008 202102s2017 xx |||||o ||| 0|eng d
035 |a (CKB)4100000002484666 
035 |a (oapen)https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/49596 
035 |a (EXLCZ)994100000002484666 
041 0 |a eng 
100 1 |a Ralf Brand  |4 auth 
245 1 0 |a How Do Emotions and Feelings Regulate Physical Activity? 
260 |b Frontiers Media SA  |c 2017 
300 |a 1 electronic resource (149 p.) 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
490 1 |a Frontiers Research Topics 
520 |a Up to date the scientific discussion about how frequency and regularity of physical activity can be increased is dominated by social-cognitive models. However, increasing evidence suggests that emotions and feelings have greater influence on physical activity than originally assumed (Rhodes, Fiala, & Conner, 2009). Generally speaking, humans possess an evaluative system with a basic action tendency to approach pleasurable events and to avoid aversive ones (Cacioppo & Berntson, 1999). Evaluative responses to a behavior and associated emotional states may influence a decision regarding whether or not to repeat being physically active. Generally, behavior associated with positive evaluations has a higher probability of being repeated than behaviors without such an association. On the contrary, an association with negative evaluations tends to decrease the probability of repeating to be physically active. Hence, evaluative responses to physical activity or the related situation can be an important aspect in the process of physical activity maintenance (McAuley et al., 2007). Several social-cognitive models of behavior change and maintenance were recently extended to take the influence of affective responses into account, in a way that variables already included in the models (e.g. outcome expectancies or attitudes) were more clearly articulated into their cognitive and affective components. For example, with regard to Social Cognitive Theory, Gellert, Ziegelmann and Schwarzer (2012) proposed to distinguish between affective and health-related outcome expectancies, and in the Theory of Planned Behavior, researchers suggested to differentiate between cognitive and affective attitudes (Lawton, Conner, & McEachan, 2009). The results of these and other studies suggest that affective components make a unique contribution to the explanation of the physical activity behavior (Brand, 2006). Other examples come from social cognition research, where it was shown that automatic evaluative responses are part of our everyday life and that they decisively influence health behavior (Hofmann, Friese, & Wiers, 2008). Accordingly, there is evidence that people who exercise regulary hold more positive automatic evaluations with exercise than non-exercisers (Bluemke, Brand, Schweizer, & Kahlert, 2010). Although significant progress has been made in showing that evaluative responses to physical activity and associated emotional states are important predictors of physical activity underlying psychological processes are far from being fully understood. Some important issues still remain to be resolved. Which role play affective states compared to concrete emotions when influencing physical activity? How do affective states and emotions interact with cognitive variables such as intentions? Are evaluative processes before, during or after physical activity important to predict future physical activity? Do negative and positive evaluations interact antagonistically or rather synergistically when physical activity as a new behavior shall be adopted? Future research will help us to resolve these and a lot of other so far unresolved issues. 
546 |a English 
653 |a implicit 
653 |a enjoyment 
653 |a automatic evaluation 
653 |a emotions 
653 |a regulation 
653 |a mood 
653 |a affect 
653 |a exercise 
653 |a feelings 
653 |a physical activity 
776 |z 2-88945-271-9 
700 1 |a Darko Jekauc  |4 auth 
906 |a BOOK 
ADM |b 2023-12-15 05:49:11 Europe/Vienna  |f system  |c marc21  |a 2018-03-10 17:16:05 Europe/Vienna  |g false 
AVE |i DOAB Directory of Open Access Books  |P DOAB Directory of Open Access Books  |x https://eu02.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/uresolver/43ACC_OEAW/openurl?u.ignore_date_coverage=true&portfolio_pid=5337388800004498&Force_direct=true  |Z 5337388800004498  |b Available  |8 5337388800004498