Prehistoric myths in modern political philosophy / / Karl Widerquist and Grant S. McCall.
How modern philosophers use and perpetuate myths about prehistory.<p>The state of nature, the origin of property, the origin of government, the primordial nature of inequality and war - why do political philosophers talk so much about the Stone Age? And are they talking about a Stone Age that...
Saved in:
VerfasserIn: | |
---|---|
TeilnehmendeR: | |
Place / Publishing House: | Edinburgh : : Edinburgh University Press,, 2017. |
Year of Publication: | 2017 |
Language: | English |
Physical Description: | 1 online resource (xiv, 274 pages) :; digital, PDF file(s). |
Notes: | Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 11 May 2017). |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Table of Contents:
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction
- Modern political philosophy and prehistoric anthropology: some preliminary issues
- The Hobbesian hypothesis: how a colonial prejudice became an essential premise in the most popular justification of government
- John Locke and the Hobbesian hypothesis: how a similar colonial prejudice became an essential premise in the most popular justification of private property rights
- The Hobbesian hypothesis in eighteenth-century political theory
- The Hobbesian hypothesis in nineteenth-century political theory
- The Hobbesian hypothesis in contemporary political theory
- The Hobbesian hypothesis in anthropology
- Nasty and brutish? An empirical assessment of the violence hypothesis
- Are you better off now than you were 12,000 years ago? An empirical assessment of the Hobbesian hypothesis
- Implications
- References
- Index.