The Barāhima’s Dilemma : : Ibn al-Rāwandī’s ›Kitāb al-Zumurrud‹ and the Epistemological Turn in the Debate on Prophecy / / Elizabeth G. Price.

When debating the need for prophets, Muslim theologians frequently cited an objection from a group called the Barāhima – either a prophet conveys what is in accordance with reason, so they would be superfluous, or a prophet conveys what is contrary to reason, so they would be rejected. The Barāhima...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Superior document:Title is part of eBook package: De Gruyter DG Plus DeG Package 2024 Part 1
VerfasserIn:
Place / Publishing House:Berlin ;, Boston : : De Gruyter, , [2024]
©2024
Year of Publication:2024
Language:English
Series:Islam – Thought, Culture, and Society , 13
Online Access:
Physical Description:1 online resource (XII, 448 p.)
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
LEADER 04922nam a2200661Ia 4500
001 9783111027203
003 DE-B1597
005 20240426104009.0
006 m|||||o||d||||||||
007 cr || ||||||||
008 240426t20242024gw fo d z eng d
020 |a 9783111027203 
024 7 |a 10.1515/9783111027203  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-B1597)635413 
040 |a DE-B1597  |b eng  |c DE-B1597  |e rda 
041 0 |a eng 
044 |a gw  |c DE 
082 0 4 |a 297.211509 
100 1 |a Price, Elizabeth G.,   |e author.  |4 aut  |4 http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut 
245 1 4 |a The Barāhima’s Dilemma :  |b Ibn al-Rāwandī’s ›Kitāb al-Zumurrud‹ and the Epistemological Turn in the Debate on Prophecy /  |c Elizabeth G. Price. 
264 1 |a Berlin ;  |a Boston :   |b De Gruyter,   |c [2024] 
264 4 |c ©2024 
300 |a 1 online resource (XII, 448 p.) 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
347 |a text file  |b PDF  |2 rda 
490 0 |a Islam – Thought, Culture, and Society ,  |x 2628-4286 ;  |v 13 
505 0 0 |t Frontmatter --   |t Acknowledgements --   |t Contents --   |t Notes on Sources, Translation, and Transliteration --   |t Abbreviations and Dates --   |t Introduction: Who Are the Barāhima? --   |t Section A The Prehistory of the Barāhima’s Dilemma --   |t Chapter One: The Brahmans in the Antique and Late Antique Imagination --   |t Chapter Two: The Brahmans in Translation: A Survey of the Early ʿAbbāsid Histories, Legends, and Pseudepigrapha --   |t Chapter Three: The Brahmans as Ethnographic Subjects: A Survey of Early ʿAbbāsid Travel and Geographical Literature --   |t Section B The Maturation of the Barāhima’s Dilemma --   |t Chapter Four: Situating the Barāhima Among the Prophetological Controversies of the Early ʿAbbāsid Period --   |t Chapter Five: The Epistemological Role of the Barāhima in the Kitāb al- Zumurrud --   |t Section C The Repercussions of the Barāhima’s Dilemma --   |t Chapter Six: The Aftermath of the Kitāb al-Zumurrud --   |t Chapter Seven: The Contradiction Horn: The Bahshamī Defence of the Rationality of Revelation --   |t Chapter Eight: The Superfluous Horn: The Bahshamiyya on the Problem of Prophetic Futility --   |t Conclusion: The Legacy of the Barāhima in Early Islamic Thought --   |t Appendices --   |t Bibliography --   |t List of Tables --   |t List of Appendices --   |t Index 
506 0 |a restricted access  |u http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_16ec  |f online access with authorization  |2 star 
520 |a When debating the need for prophets, Muslim theologians frequently cited an objection from a group called the Barāhima – either a prophet conveys what is in accordance with reason, so they would be superfluous, or a prophet conveys what is contrary to reason, so they would be rejected. The Barāhima did not recognise prophecy or revelation, because they claimed that reason alone could guide them on the right path. But who were these Barāhima exactly? Were they Brahmans, as their title would suggest? And how did they become associated with this highly incisive objection to prophecy? This book traces the genealogy of the Barāhima and explores their profound impact on the evolution of Islamic theology. It also charts the pivotal role that the Kitāb al-Zumurrud played in disseminating the Barāhima’s critiques and in facilitating an epistemological turn in the wider discourse on prophecy (nubuwwa). When faced with the Barāhima, theologians were not only pressed to explain why rational agents required the input of revelation, but to also identify an epistemic gap that only a prophet could fill. A debate about whether humans required prophets thus evolved into a debate about what humans could and could not know by their own means. 
530 |a Issued also in print. 
538 |a Mode of access: Internet via World Wide Web. 
546 |a In English. 
588 0 |a Description based on online resource; title from PDF title page (publisher's Web site, viewed 26. Apr 2024) 
650 4 |a Brahman. 
650 4 |a Erkenntnistheorie. 
650 4 |a Mutasiliten. 
650 4 |a Polemik. 
653 |a Brahmans. 
653 |a Epistemology. 
653 |a Muʿtazila. 
653 |a polemics. 
773 0 8 |i Title is part of eBook package:  |d De Gruyter  |t DG Plus DeG Package 2024 Part 1  |z 9783111332192 
776 0 |c EPUB  |z 9783111027241 
776 0 |c print  |z 9783111027128 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1515/9783111027203 
856 4 0 |u https://www.degruyter.com/isbn/9783111027203 
856 4 2 |3 Cover  |u https://www.degruyter.com/document/cover/isbn/9783111027203/original 
912 |a 978-3-11-133219-2 DG Plus DeG Package 2024 Part 1  |b 2024 
912 |a EBA_CL_PLTLJSIS 
912 |a EBA_DGALL 
912 |a EBA_EBKALL 
912 |a EBA_ECL_PLTLJSIS 
912 |a EBA_EEBKALL 
912 |a EBA_ESSHALL 
912 |a EBA_SSHALL 
912 |a GBV-deGruyter-alles