Linguistic Purism in Action : : How auxiliary tun was stigmatized in Early New High German / / Nils Langer.

Anhand der Geschichte des Hilfsverbs tun (Susanne tut gern Kuchen essen) seit 1350 wird gezeigt, dass präskriptive Grammatiker im 16. und 17. Jahrhundert aktiv in den Standardisierungesprozess eingegriffen haben, um gewisse morphosyntaktische Konstruktionen von der Prestigesprache "Standarddeut...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Superior document:Title is part of eBook package: De Gruyter DGBA Backlist Complete English Language 2000-2014 PART1
VerfasserIn:
Place / Publishing House:Berlin ;, Boston : : De Gruyter, , [2013]
©2001
Year of Publication:2013
Edition:Reprint 2013
Language:English
Series:Studia Linguistica Germanica , 60
Online Access:
Physical Description:1 online resource (312 p.) :; Zahlr. Abb.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
LEADER 05007nam a22008895i 4500
001 9783110881103
003 DE-B1597
005 20230228015514.0
006 m|||||o||d||||||||
007 cr || ||||||||
008 230228t20132001gw fo d z eng d
019 |a (OCoLC)1013963453 
019 |a (OCoLC)1037933163 
019 |a (OCoLC)1042018757 
019 |a (OCoLC)1043660593 
020 |a 9783110881103 
024 7 |a 10.1515/9783110881103  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-B1597)55898 
035 |a (OCoLC)853236868 
040 |a DE-B1597  |b eng  |c DE-B1597  |e rda 
041 0 |a eng 
044 |a gw  |c DE 
050 4 |a PF4521 
072 7 |a LAN009000  |2 bisacsh 
082 0 4 |a 437/.02 
100 1 |a Langer, Nils,   |e author.  |4 aut  |4 http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut 
245 1 0 |a Linguistic Purism in Action :  |b How auxiliary tun was stigmatized in Early New High German /  |c Nils Langer. 
250 |a Reprint 2013 
264 1 |a Berlin ;  |a Boston :   |b De Gruyter,   |c [2013] 
264 4 |c ©2001 
300 |a 1 online resource (312 p.) :  |b Zahlr. Abb. 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
347 |a text file  |b PDF  |2 rda 
490 0 |a Studia Linguistica Germanica ,  |x 1861-5651 ;  |v 60 
505 0 0 |t Frontmatter --   |t Table of Content --   |t Acknowledgements --   |t Abbreviations --   |t 1. Introduction --   |t 2. Part I. The Distribution of Auxiliary Tun --   |t 3. Part II. The Stigmatization of Auxiliary Tun --   |t 4. Conclusion --   |t 5. Appendix: Data and Bibliographies 
506 0 |a restricted access  |u http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_16ec  |f online access with authorization  |2 star 
520 |a Anhand der Geschichte des Hilfsverbs tun (Susanne tut gern Kuchen essen) seit 1350 wird gezeigt, dass präskriptive Grammatiker im 16. und 17. Jahrhundert aktiv in den Standardisierungesprozess eingegriffen haben, um gewisse morphosyntaktische Konstruktionen von der Prestigesprache "Standarddeutsch" fernzuhalten. 
520 |a The auxiliary do (tun) is one of the most-discussed constructions in West Germanic. In German, there is a striking opposition between modern standard German, where the construction is virtually ungrammatical and considered to be "sub-standard" by most speakers, whilst, as this book shows, the construction is attested in all modern dialects as well as historic stages since 1350. In answering why auxiliary tun is ungrammatical in modern standard German, it is shown that the stigmatization of tun was caused by prescriptive grammarians in the 16th-18th century. Furthermore it is shown that the stigmatization of tun as "bad" German occurred in clearly discernible stages, from bad poetry (1550-1680), to bad written German (1680-1740) and finally to "bad" German in general (after 1740), thus providing evidence that the history of the standardization of German needs to take into account direct metalinguistic comments from prescriptive grammarians. The effectiveness of linguistic purism is also shown by evidence from two other constructions, namely polynegation and double perfect. 
530 |a Issued also in print. 
538 |a Mode of access: Internet via World Wide Web. 
546 |a In English. 
588 0 |a Description based on online resource; title from PDF title page (publisher's Web site, viewed 28. Feb 2023) 
650 0 |a German language  |x Standardization  |x History. 
650 0 |a German language  |y Early modern, 1500-1700  |x Auxiliary verbs. 
650 0 |a Tun (The German word). 
650 4 |a Frühneuhochdeutsch. 
650 4 |a Hilfsverb. 
650 4 |a Schriftsprache. 
650 4 |a Sprachwandel. 
650 4 |a Verb. 
650 7 |a LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Linguistics / General.  |2 bisacsh 
773 0 8 |i Title is part of eBook package:  |d De Gruyter  |t DGBA Backlist Complete English Language 2000-2014 PART1  |z 9783110238570 
773 0 8 |i Title is part of eBook package:  |d De Gruyter  |t DGBA Backlist Linguistics and Semiotics 2000-2014 (EN)  |z 9783110238457 
773 0 8 |i Title is part of eBook package:  |d De Gruyter  |t DGBA Linguistics and Semiotics 2000 - 2014  |z 9783110636970  |o ZDB-23-DLS 
776 0 |c print  |z 9783110170245 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110881103 
856 4 0 |u https://www.degruyter.com/isbn/9783110881103 
856 4 2 |3 Cover  |u https://www.degruyter.com/document/cover/isbn/9783110881103/original 
912 |a 978-3-11-023845-7 DGBA Backlist Linguistics and Semiotics 2000-2014 (EN)  |c 2000  |d 2014 
912 |a 978-3-11-023857-0 DGBA Backlist Complete English Language 2000-2014 PART1  |c 2000  |d 2014 
912 |a EBA_BACKALL 
912 |a EBA_CL_LS 
912 |a EBA_DGALL 
912 |a EBA_EBACKALL 
912 |a EBA_EBKALL 
912 |a EBA_ECL_LS 
912 |a EBA_EEBKALL 
912 |a EBA_ESSHALL 
912 |a EBA_SSHALL 
912 |a GBV-deGruyter-alles 
912 |a PDA11SSHE 
912 |a PDA13ENGE 
912 |a PDA17SSHEE 
912 |a PDA5EBK 
912 |a ZDB-23-DLS  |c 2000  |d 2014