Metonymy in Frames : : The Role of Functional Relations in Contiguity-Based Semantic Shifts of Nouns / / Anselm L. Terhalle.

• Superior document: Title is part of eBook package: De Gruyter DG Plus DeG Package 2023 Part 1
• VerfasserIn: Terhalle, Anselm L.,
• Place / Publishing House: Düsseldorf : : düsseldorf university press, , [2022]; ©2023
• Year of Publication: 2022
• Language: English
• Series: Dissertations in Language and Cognition
• Physical Description: 1 online resource (XX, 221 p.)
• Other title: Frontmatter --; Preface --; Acknowledgements --; Contents --; List of Figures --; List of Tables --; List of Abbreviations --; 1 Introduction --; 2 Mentally Representing the World --; 3 Frames: A Recursive Format for Mental Knowledge Representation --; 4 Meaning: Stability and Flexibility --; 5 Metonymy --; 6 A Way of Analysing Metonymy in Frames --; 7 Integrating Received Knowledge of Metonymy into Frames --; 8 Source Focus versus Target Focus --; 9 Metonymy and Directionality: Patterns in Non-Relational Frames --; 10 Metonymy and Directionality: Patterns in Relational Frames --; 11 Conceptual Distance in Metonymy --; 12 Summary and Discussion --; 13 Conclusion --; References --; Index
• Format: Mode of access: Internet via World Wide Web.
• ISBN: 9783110755459; 9783111175782; 9783110993899; 9783110994810; 9783110993707; 9783110993684
• DOI: 10.1515/9783110755459
• Access: restricted access
• Hierarchical level: Monograph
• Statement of Responsibility: Anselm L. Terhalle.

This work refines the notion of metonymy and the underlying notion of conceptual contiguity by describing a fundamental structural property of metonymy. Studied since antiquity, metonymy is a ubiquitous mechanism of meaning construction in context that involves a linguistically coded source concept that directs attention to a situationally relevant target concept. Modelling metonymic contiguity by means of recursive attribute-value structures, inspired by findings from cognitive psychology, suggests that the metonymic relation depends largely on the functionality of the source with respect to the target. Based on this structural property, several patterns can be identified as potential bases for metonymic shifts. How these shifts are coded on the linguistic surface varies depending on whether the focus within the relevant frame is more on the source (metonymy closer to literal use) or more on the target (metonymy closer to word formation). Furthermore, decomposing the contiguity relation into functional relations hints at a potential conceptual distance between the source and target. This approach contributes to understanding the boundaries and possibilities of metonymy.