The Case for East Roman Studies / / Anthony Kaldellis.

Byzantine Studies has reached a tipping point: a growing number of historians have realized that the terms “Byzantium” and “the Byzantines” distort the reality and identity of the society that we study, and encode a series of prejudices that were embedded in western perceptions. The aim of these ter...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
VerfasserIn:
Place / Publishing House:Leeds : : ARC Humanities Press, , [2024]
©2024
Year of Publication:2024
Language:English
Series:Past Imperfect
Online Access:
Physical Description:1 online resource (112 p.)
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Other title:Frontmatter --
Contents --
Introduction --
Chapter 1 RIP Byzantium --
Chapter 2 Contenders for a New Field-Name --
Chapter 3 Implications for Allied Fields --
Conclusions --
Further Reading
Summary:Byzantine Studies has reached a tipping point: a growing number of historians have realized that the terms “Byzantium” and “the Byzantines” distort the reality and identity of the society that we study, and encode a series of prejudices that were embedded in western perceptions. The aim of these terms was to exclude the eastern empire from important discussions and historical developments. It is time to end this exercise in orientalist fiction, but what are the alternatives? In this book, Anthony Kaldellis surveys the pros and cons of a range of possible options and examines the implications of a field name-change also for art history, philology, and the study of Eastern Orthodoxy. The new name he proposes will carry the field into the next phase of its history, renegotiate its relationships with its peers and respect the testimony of our sources.
Format:Mode of access: Internet via World Wide Web.
ISBN:9781802702545
DOI:10.1515/9781802702545?locatt=mode:legacy
Access:restricted access
Hierarchical level:Monograph
Statement of Responsibility: Anthony Kaldellis.