Who are 'We'? : : Reimagining Alterity and Affinity in Anthropology / / ed. by Nayanika Mathur, Liana Chua.
Who do “we” anthropologists think “we” are? And how do forms and notions of collective disciplinary identity shape the way we think, write, and do anthropology? This volume explores how the anthropological “we” has been construed, transformed, and deployed across history and the global anthropologic...
Saved in:
Superior document: | Title is part of eBook package: De Gruyter Berghahn Books Complete eBook-Package 2018 |
---|---|
MitwirkendeR: | |
HerausgeberIn: | |
Place / Publishing House: | New York ;, Oxford : : Berghahn Books, , [2018] ©2018 |
Year of Publication: | 2018 |
Language: | English |
Series: | Methodology & History in Anthropology ;
34 |
Online Access: | |
Physical Description: | 1 online resource (264 p.) |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Other title: | Frontmatter -- Contents -- List of Figures -- Acknowledgements -- Introduction. Who Are ‘We’? -- Part I. Revisiting the Anthropological ‘We’ -- Chapter 1. Anthropology at the Dawn of Apartheid: Radcliffe-Brown and Malinowski’s South African Engagements, 1919–34 -- Chapter 2. The Savage Noble: Alterity and Aristocracy in Anthropology -- Part II. Alterity and Affinity in Anthropology’s Global Landscape -- Chapter 3. The Anthropological Imaginarium: Crafting Alterity, The Self and an Ethnographic Film in Southwest China -- Chapter 4. The Risks of Affinity: Indigeneity and Indigenous Film Production in Bolivia -- Chapter 5. Shifting the ‘We’ in Oceania: Anthropology and Pacific Islanders Revisited -- Part III. Where Do ‘We’ Go from Here? -- Chapter 6. Crafting Anthropology Otherwise: Alterity, Affinity and Performance -- Chapter 7. Towards an Ecumenical Anthropology -- Afterword -- Index |
---|---|
Summary: | Who do “we” anthropologists think “we” are? And how do forms and notions of collective disciplinary identity shape the way we think, write, and do anthropology? This volume explores how the anthropological “we” has been construed, transformed, and deployed across history and the global anthropological landscape. Drawing together both reflections and ethnographic case studies, it interrogates the critical—yet poorly studied—roles played by myriad anthropological “we” ss in generating and influencing anthropological theory, method, and analysis. In the process, new spaces are opened for reimagining who “we” are – and what “we,” and indeed anthropology, could become. |
Format: | Mode of access: Internet via World Wide Web. |
ISBN: | 9781785338892 9783110998115 |
DOI: | 10.1515/9781785338892?locatt=mode:legacy |
Access: | restricted access |
Hierarchical level: | Monograph |
Statement of Responsibility: | ed. by Nayanika Mathur, Liana Chua. |