Bendectin and Birth Defects : : The Challenges of Mass Toxic Substances Litigation / / Michael D. Green.

Benedictin was prescribed to more than thirty-five million American women from its introduction in 1956 until 1983, when it was withdrawn from the market. The drug's manufacturer, Merrill Dow Pharmaceuticals, a major U.S. pharmaceutical firm, joined a list of other companies whose product liabi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Superior document:Title is part of eBook package: De Gruyter University of Pennsylvania Press Package Archive 1898-1999
VerfasserIn:
Place / Publishing House:Philadelphia : : University of Pennsylvania Press, , [2016]
©1996
Year of Publication:2016
Language:English
Online Access:
Physical Description:1 online resource (384 p.)
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Table of Contents:
  • Frontmatter
  • Contents
  • Preface
  • Acknowledgments
  • Chapter 1. A Birth Defect Child Is Born
  • Chapter 2. Locating Bendectin Within the Mass Toxic Landscape
  • Chapter 3. The Science of Determining Toxic Causation
  • Chapter 4. The Food and Drug Administration
  • Chapter 5. The Wm. S. Merrell Company
  • Chapter 6. A Mother's Quest
  • Chapter 7. The Mekdeci Case
  • Chapter 8. The Unraveling Of Mekdeci
  • Chapter 9. The Proliferation of Bendectin Litigation
  • Chapter 10. Litigating a Multidistrict Case
  • Chapter 11. The Withdrawal of Bendectin
  • Chapter 12. Forging a Mass Toxic Substances Trial
  • Chapter 13. The Settlement and Unsettlement of MDL-486
  • Chapter 14. The MDL-486 Trial
  • Chapter 15. Aggregative Procedure in Mass Toxic Substances Litigation
  • Chapter 16. The Third Phase of Bendectin Litigation: Oxendine, Richardson, and the Individual Trials
  • Chapter 17. The Legacy of Bendectin for Toxic Causation Law
  • Chapter 18. The Lessons and Non-Lessons of Bendectin Litigation
  • Selected Bibliography
  • Index