The Bureaucracy of Empathy : : Law, Vivisection, and Animal Pain in Late Nineteenth-Century Britain / / Shira Shmuely.

• Superior document: Title is part of eBook package: De Gruyter Cornell University Press Complete eBook-Package 2023
• VerfasserIn: Shmuely, Shira,
• Place / Publishing House: Ithaca, NY : : Cornell University Press, , [2023]; ©2023
• Year of Publication: 2023
• Language: English
• Series: Corpus Juris: The Humanities in Politics and Law
• Physical Description: 1 online resource (270 p.) :; 18 b&w halftones, 1 chart
• Other title: Frontmatter --; CONTENTS --; Acknowledgments --; Introduction --; ONE The Legal and Scientific Landscapes of the Act --; TWO The Right Forms for the Job: Anesthesia, Brain Research, and Certificate E --; THREE The Prick of a Needle: The Challenges of Inoculation --; FOUR Regulating Pain in Laboratories: The Inspectorate --; FIVE Libel, Slander, and Vivisection --; Conclusion: The Act in the Twentieth Century --; Postscript: “Can They Suffer?” --; Appendix I: British Cruelty to Animals Legislation and Case Law, Nineteenth Century --; Appendix II: An Act to Amend the Law Relating to Cruelty to Animals, 1876 --; Bibliography --; Index
• Format: Mode of access: Internet via World Wide Web.
• ISBN: 9781501770418; 9783110751833; 9783111319292; 9783111318912; 9783111319131; 9783111318189
• DOI: 10.1515/9781501770418?locatt=mode:legacy
• Access: restricted access
• Hierarchical level: Monograph
• Statement of Responsibility: Shira Shmuely.

The Bureaucracy of Empathy revolves around two central questions: What is pain? And how do we recognize, understand, and ameliorate the pain of nonhuman animals? Shira Shmuely investigates these ethical issues through a close and careful history of the origins, implementation, and enforcement of the 1876 Cruelty to Animals Act of Parliament, which for the first time imposed legal restrictions on animal experimentation and mandated official supervision of procedures "calculated to give pain" to animal subjects.Exploring how scientists, bureaucrats, and lawyers wrestled with the problem of animal pain and its perception, Shmuely traces in depth and detail how the Act was enforced, the medical establishment's initial resistance and then embrace of regulation, and the challenges from anti-vivisection advocates who deemed it insufficient protection against animal suffering. She shows how a "bureaucracy of empathy" emerged to support and administer the legislation, navigating incongruent interpretations of "pain." This crucial moment in animal law and ethics continues to inform laws regulating the treatment of nonhuman animals in laboratories, farms, and homes around the worlds to the present.