In Their Best Interest? : : The Case against Equal Rights for Children / / Laura M. Purdy.
From where they live and which school they attend to whether they may work, children's decisions are controlled by parents and guardians. Advocates of equal rights for children have, however, offered both empirical evidence and ethical arguments against the popular assumption that children are...
Saved in:
Superior document: | Title is part of eBook package: De Gruyter Cornell University Press Archive Pre-2000 |
---|---|
VerfasserIn: | |
Place / Publishing House: | Ithaca, NY : : Cornell University Press, , [2019] ©1992 |
Year of Publication: | 2019 |
Language: | English |
Online Access: | |
Physical Description: | 1 online resource (272 p.) |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Other title: | Frontmatter -- CONTENTS -- ACKNOWLEDGMENTS -- INTRODUCTION -- Part I. The Argument from justice -- PART II. The Argument from Consequences -- Conclusion -- Appendix: Moral Theory -- Selected Bibliography -- Index |
---|---|
Summary: | From where they live and which school they attend to whether they may work, children's decisions are controlled by parents and guardians. Advocates of equal rights for children have, however, offered both empirical evidence and ethical arguments against the popular assumption that children are incompetent to exercise the same freedoms as adults. Laura M. Purdy here challenges both aspects of the case for children's liberation, rejecting the conclusion that in democratic societies legal distinctions between children and adults should be eliminated. |
Format: | Mode of access: Internet via World Wide Web. |
ISBN: | 9781501737558 9783110536171 |
DOI: | 10.7591/9781501737558 |
Access: | restricted access |
Hierarchical level: | Monograph |
Statement of Responsibility: | Laura M. Purdy. |