In Their Best Interest? : : The Case against Equal Rights for Children / / Laura M. Purdy.

From where they live and which school they attend to whether they may work, children's decisions are controlled by parents and guardians. Advocates of equal rights for children have, however, offered both empirical evidence and ethical arguments against the popular assumption that children are...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Superior document:Title is part of eBook package: De Gruyter Cornell University Press Archive Pre-2000
VerfasserIn:
Place / Publishing House:Ithaca, NY : : Cornell University Press, , [2019]
©1992
Year of Publication:2019
Language:English
Online Access:
Physical Description:1 online resource (272 p.)
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Other title:Frontmatter --
CONTENTS --
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS --
INTRODUCTION --
Part I. The Argument from justice --
PART II. The Argument from Consequences --
Conclusion --
Appendix: Moral Theory --
Selected Bibliography --
Index
Summary:From where they live and which school they attend to whether they may work, children's decisions are controlled by parents and guardians. Advocates of equal rights for children have, however, offered both empirical evidence and ethical arguments against the popular assumption that children are incompetent to exercise the same freedoms as adults. Laura M. Purdy here challenges both aspects of the case for children's liberation, rejecting the conclusion that in democratic societies legal distinctions between children and adults should be eliminated.
Format:Mode of access: Internet via World Wide Web.
ISBN:9781501737558
9783110536171
DOI:10.7591/9781501737558
Access:restricted access
Hierarchical level:Monograph
Statement of Responsibility: Laura M. Purdy.