The Best Defense : : Policy Alternatives for U.S. Nuclear Security from the 1950s to the 1990s / / David Goldfischer.

A fundamental question posed by the demise of the cold war is whether the superpowers' monumentally dangerous and costly arms buildup was necessary. Was it inevitable that the United States and the Soviet Union acquire capabilities to destroy each other in a nuclear war? Or could they have agre...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Superior document:Title is part of eBook package: De Gruyter Cornell University Press Archive Pre-2000
VerfasserIn:
Place / Publishing House:Ithaca, NY : : Cornell University Press, , [2019]
©1993
Year of Publication:2019
Language:English
Series:Cornell Studies in Security Affairs
Online Access:
Physical Description:1 online resource (288 p.)
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id 9781501736681
ctrlnum (DE-B1597)534567
(OCoLC)1178769069
collection bib_alma
record_format marc
spelling Goldfischer, David, author. aut http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut
The Best Defense : Policy Alternatives for U.S. Nuclear Security from the 1950s to the 1990s / David Goldfischer.
Ithaca, NY : Cornell University Press, [2019]
©1993
1 online resource (288 p.)
text txt rdacontent
computer c rdamedia
online resource cr rdacarrier
text file PDF rda
Cornell Studies in Security Affairs
Frontmatter -- Contents -- Acknowledgments -- Acronyms -- Introduction -- 1. The Meaning of Offense and Defense -- 2. The Nuclear Policy Stalemate and the Search for Alternatives (1972-1991) -- 3. The Argument for Mutual Defense Emphasis -- 4. Mutual Defense Emphasis in the Bomber Age -- 5. The Origins and Influence of Offense-Only Arms Control Theory (1960-1972) -- 6. Mutual Defense Emphasis in the 1960s -- 7. Strategic Defense without Star Wars: Defense Emphasis in the 1980s and Beyond -- Index
restricted access http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_16ec online access with authorization star
A fundamental question posed by the demise of the cold war is whether the superpowers' monumentally dangerous and costly arms buildup was necessary. Was it inevitable that the United States and the Soviet Union acquire capabilities to destroy each other in a nuclear war? Or could they have agreed instead to address the nuclear danger through mutual emphasis on defenses? Might such an approach be a feasible option for nuclear powers in today's world?Examining crucial episodes in U.S. security history from the Truman years through the Reagan administration, David Goldfischer considers how figures including J. Robert Oppenheimer, Donald G. Brennan, Freeman Dyson, and Jonathan Schell advanced compelling arguments for seeking an arms control agreement favoring defenses against nuclear attack. Goldfischer offers provocative explanations for why this approach, known as "mutual defense emphasis" (MDE), was rejected in favor of the offense-dominated strategies of nuclear warfighting or "mutual assured destruction" (MAD). The failure seriously to explore MDE, he shows, left supporters of arms control with a false choice between the extremes of MAD and a utopian search for complete nuclear disarmament. Goldfischer concludes with a discussion of how the "Strategic Defense Initiative" (Star Wars)—which used the rhetoric of MDE to mask a renewed search for a nuclear warfighting strategy—has since the 1980s undermined the prospect for serious debate over defense emphasis.Policymakers, activists, political scientists, and scholars and students of security studies and postwar U.S. defense history will welcome this book.
Mode of access: Internet via World Wide Web.
In English.
Description based on online resource; title from PDF title page (publisher's Web site, viewed 02. Mrz 2022)
International Studies.
Political Science & Political History.
Security Studies.
POLITICAL SCIENCE / Security (National & International). bisacsh
Title is part of eBook package: De Gruyter Cornell University Press Archive Pre-2000 9783110536171
https://doi.org/10.7591/9781501736681
https://www.degruyter.com/isbn/9781501736681
Cover https://www.degruyter.com/document/cover/isbn/9781501736681/original
language English
format eBook
author Goldfischer, David,
Goldfischer, David,
spellingShingle Goldfischer, David,
Goldfischer, David,
The Best Defense : Policy Alternatives for U.S. Nuclear Security from the 1950s to the 1990s /
Cornell Studies in Security Affairs
Frontmatter --
Contents --
Acknowledgments --
Acronyms --
Introduction --
1. The Meaning of Offense and Defense --
2. The Nuclear Policy Stalemate and the Search for Alternatives (1972-1991) --
3. The Argument for Mutual Defense Emphasis --
4. Mutual Defense Emphasis in the Bomber Age --
5. The Origins and Influence of Offense-Only Arms Control Theory (1960-1972) --
6. Mutual Defense Emphasis in the 1960s --
7. Strategic Defense without Star Wars: Defense Emphasis in the 1980s and Beyond --
Index
author_facet Goldfischer, David,
Goldfischer, David,
author_variant d g dg
d g dg
author_role VerfasserIn
VerfasserIn
author_sort Goldfischer, David,
title The Best Defense : Policy Alternatives for U.S. Nuclear Security from the 1950s to the 1990s /
title_sub Policy Alternatives for U.S. Nuclear Security from the 1950s to the 1990s /
title_full The Best Defense : Policy Alternatives for U.S. Nuclear Security from the 1950s to the 1990s / David Goldfischer.
title_fullStr The Best Defense : Policy Alternatives for U.S. Nuclear Security from the 1950s to the 1990s / David Goldfischer.
title_full_unstemmed The Best Defense : Policy Alternatives for U.S. Nuclear Security from the 1950s to the 1990s / David Goldfischer.
title_auth The Best Defense : Policy Alternatives for U.S. Nuclear Security from the 1950s to the 1990s /
title_alt Frontmatter --
Contents --
Acknowledgments --
Acronyms --
Introduction --
1. The Meaning of Offense and Defense --
2. The Nuclear Policy Stalemate and the Search for Alternatives (1972-1991) --
3. The Argument for Mutual Defense Emphasis --
4. Mutual Defense Emphasis in the Bomber Age --
5. The Origins and Influence of Offense-Only Arms Control Theory (1960-1972) --
6. Mutual Defense Emphasis in the 1960s --
7. Strategic Defense without Star Wars: Defense Emphasis in the 1980s and Beyond --
Index
title_new The Best Defense :
title_sort the best defense : policy alternatives for u.s. nuclear security from the 1950s to the 1990s /
series Cornell Studies in Security Affairs
series2 Cornell Studies in Security Affairs
publisher Cornell University Press,
publishDate 2019
physical 1 online resource (288 p.)
contents Frontmatter --
Contents --
Acknowledgments --
Acronyms --
Introduction --
1. The Meaning of Offense and Defense --
2. The Nuclear Policy Stalemate and the Search for Alternatives (1972-1991) --
3. The Argument for Mutual Defense Emphasis --
4. Mutual Defense Emphasis in the Bomber Age --
5. The Origins and Influence of Offense-Only Arms Control Theory (1960-1972) --
6. Mutual Defense Emphasis in the 1960s --
7. Strategic Defense without Star Wars: Defense Emphasis in the 1980s and Beyond --
Index
isbn 9781501736681
9783110536171
url https://doi.org/10.7591/9781501736681
https://www.degruyter.com/isbn/9781501736681
https://www.degruyter.com/document/cover/isbn/9781501736681/original
illustrated Not Illustrated
doi_str_mv 10.7591/9781501736681
oclc_num 1178769069
work_keys_str_mv AT goldfischerdavid thebestdefensepolicyalternativesforusnuclearsecurityfromthe1950stothe1990s
AT goldfischerdavid bestdefensepolicyalternativesforusnuclearsecurityfromthe1950stothe1990s
status_str n
ids_txt_mv (DE-B1597)534567
(OCoLC)1178769069
carrierType_str_mv cr
hierarchy_parent_title Title is part of eBook package: De Gruyter Cornell University Press Archive Pre-2000
is_hierarchy_title The Best Defense : Policy Alternatives for U.S. Nuclear Security from the 1950s to the 1990s /
container_title Title is part of eBook package: De Gruyter Cornell University Press Archive Pre-2000
_version_ 1770177105175248896
fullrecord <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>04576nam a22006615i 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">9781501736681</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-B1597</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20220302035458.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="006">m|||||o||d||||||||</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr || ||||||||</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">220302t20191993nyu fo d z eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9781501736681</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.7591/9781501736681</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-B1597)534567</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1178769069</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-B1597</subfield><subfield code="b">eng</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-B1597</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="044" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nyu</subfield><subfield code="c">US-NY</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="072" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">POL012000</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Goldfischer, David, </subfield><subfield code="e">author.</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield><subfield code="4">http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">The Best Defense :</subfield><subfield code="b">Policy Alternatives for U.S. Nuclear Security from the 1950s to the 1990s /</subfield><subfield code="c">David Goldfischer.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Ithaca, NY : </subfield><subfield code="b">Cornell University Press, </subfield><subfield code="c">[2019]</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="c">©1993</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 online resource (288 p.)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">computer</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">online resource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="347" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">text file</subfield><subfield code="b">PDF</subfield><subfield code="2">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Cornell Studies in Security Affairs</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="t">Frontmatter -- </subfield><subfield code="t">Contents -- </subfield><subfield code="t">Acknowledgments -- </subfield><subfield code="t">Acronyms -- </subfield><subfield code="t">Introduction -- </subfield><subfield code="t">1. The Meaning of Offense and Defense -- </subfield><subfield code="t">2. The Nuclear Policy Stalemate and the Search for Alternatives (1972-1991) -- </subfield><subfield code="t">3. The Argument for Mutual Defense Emphasis -- </subfield><subfield code="t">4. Mutual Defense Emphasis in the Bomber Age -- </subfield><subfield code="t">5. The Origins and Influence of Offense-Only Arms Control Theory (1960-1972) -- </subfield><subfield code="t">6. Mutual Defense Emphasis in the 1960s -- </subfield><subfield code="t">7. Strategic Defense without Star Wars: Defense Emphasis in the 1980s and Beyond -- </subfield><subfield code="t">Index</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="506" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">restricted access</subfield><subfield code="u">http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_16ec</subfield><subfield code="f">online access with authorization</subfield><subfield code="2">star</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">A fundamental question posed by the demise of the cold war is whether the superpowers' monumentally dangerous and costly arms buildup was necessary. Was it inevitable that the United States and the Soviet Union acquire capabilities to destroy each other in a nuclear war? Or could they have agreed instead to address the nuclear danger through mutual emphasis on defenses? Might such an approach be a feasible option for nuclear powers in today's world?Examining crucial episodes in U.S. security history from the Truman years through the Reagan administration, David Goldfischer considers how figures including J. Robert Oppenheimer, Donald G. Brennan, Freeman Dyson, and Jonathan Schell advanced compelling arguments for seeking an arms control agreement favoring defenses against nuclear attack. Goldfischer offers provocative explanations for why this approach, known as "mutual defense emphasis" (MDE), was rejected in favor of the offense-dominated strategies of nuclear warfighting or "mutual assured destruction" (MAD). The failure seriously to explore MDE, he shows, left supporters of arms control with a false choice between the extremes of MAD and a utopian search for complete nuclear disarmament. Goldfischer concludes with a discussion of how the "Strategic Defense Initiative" (Star Wars)—which used the rhetoric of MDE to mask a renewed search for a nuclear warfighting strategy—has since the 1980s undermined the prospect for serious debate over defense emphasis.Policymakers, activists, political scientists, and scholars and students of security studies and postwar U.S. defense history will welcome this book.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="538" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Mode of access: Internet via World Wide Web.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="546" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">In English.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="588" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Description based on online resource; title from PDF title page (publisher's Web site, viewed 02. Mrz 2022)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">International Studies.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Political Science &amp; Political History.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Security Studies.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">POLITICAL SCIENCE / Security (National &amp; International).</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Title is part of eBook package:</subfield><subfield code="d">De Gruyter</subfield><subfield code="t">Cornell University Press Archive Pre-2000</subfield><subfield code="z">9783110536171</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.7591/9781501736681</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://www.degruyter.com/isbn/9781501736681</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="3">Cover</subfield><subfield code="u">https://www.degruyter.com/document/cover/isbn/9781501736681/original</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">978-3-11-053617-1 Cornell University Press Archive Pre-2000</subfield><subfield code="b">2000</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">EBA_BACKALL</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">EBA_CL_SN</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">EBA_EBACKALL</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">EBA_EBKALL</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">EBA_ECL_SN</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">EBA_EEBKALL</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">EBA_ESSHALL</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">EBA_PPALL</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">EBA_SSHALL</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV-deGruyter-alles</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">PDA11SSHE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">PDA13ENGE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">PDA17SSHEE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">PDA5EBK</subfield></datafield></record></collection>