Ending Empire : : Contested Sovereignty and Territorial Partition / / Hendrik Spruyt.

• Superior document: Title is part of eBook package: De Gruyter Cornell University Press Backlist 2000-2013
• VerfasserIn: Spruyt, Hendrik,
• Place / Publishing House: Ithaca, NY : : Cornell University Press, , [2018]; ©2005
• Year of Publication: 2018
• Language: English
• Series: Cornell Studies in Political Economy
• Physical Description: 1 online resource (326 p.) :; 7 tables, 3 maps
• Other title: Frontmatter --; Contents --; Maps And Tables --; Preface --; Introduction: Contested Territories And Empire --; Chapter One.Institutional Frameworks And Territorial Policy --; Chapter Two.The Changing Fortunes Of Empire --; Chapter Three.The Hexagon Or The Empire: France And The Algerian Quagmire --; Chapter Four.Whitehall Tacks To The Wind Of Change --; Chapter Five.Ranking With Denmark: The Dutch Fear Of Imperial Retreat --; Chapter Six.The First Maritime Empire And The Last: Portugal In Africa --; Chapter Seven.Russia Retreats From The Union --; Chapter Eight.The Fourth Republic In Jerusalem --; Conclusion: Contesting Sovereignty In A Global System --; Bibliography --; Index
• Format: Mode of access: Internet via World Wide Web.
• ISBN: 9781501717871; 9783110536157
• DOI: 10.7591/9781501717871
• Access: restricted access
• Hierarchical level: Monograph
• Statement of Responsibility: Hendrik Spruyt.

At the dawn of the twentieth century, imperial powers controlled most of the globe. Within a few decades after World War II, many of the great empires had dissolved, and more recently, multinational polities have similarly disbanded. This process of reallocating patterns of authority, from internal hierarchy to inter-state relations, proved far more contentious in some cases than in others. While some governments exited the colonial era without becoming embroiled in lengthy conflicts, others embarked on courses that drained their economies, compelled huge sacrifices, and caused domestic upheaval and revolution. What explains these variations in territorial policy? More specifically, why do some governments have greater latitude to alter existing territorial arrangements whereas others are constrained in their room for maneuver?In Ending Empire, Hendrik Spruyt argues that the answer lies in the domestic institutional structures of the central governments. Fragmented polities provide more opportunities for hard-liners to veto concessions to nationalist and secessionist demands, thus making violent conflict more likely. Spruyt examines these dynamics in the democratic colonial empires of Britain, France, and the Netherlands. He then turns to the authoritarian Portuguese empire and the break-up of the Soviet Union. Finally, the author submits that this theory, which speaks to the political dynamics of partition, can be applied to other contested territories, including those at the heart of the Arab-Israeli conflict.