Parallel Paths : : Fiduciary Doctrine and the Crown-Native Relationship in Canada / / Leonard Rotman.
In a landmark decision in 1984, the Supreme Court of Canada declared that the Crown is bound by fiduciary, or trust-like, obligations to Canada's aboriginal peoples. By holding the Crown's duty to be legal, rather than merely political or moral, the Supreme Court blazed a new path in Canad...
Saved in:
Superior document: | Title is part of eBook package: De Gruyter University of Toronto Press eBook-Package Archive 1933-1999 |
---|---|
VerfasserIn: | |
Place / Publishing House: | Toronto : : University of Toronto Press, , [2020] ©1996 |
Year of Publication: | 2020 |
Language: | English |
Series: | Heritage
|
Online Access: | |
Physical Description: | 1 online resource (504 p.) |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Table of Contents:
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- Table of Cases
- PART ONE. The Juridical Understanding of the Crown-Native Fiduciary Relationship
- 1. Introduction
- 2. The Politics Underlying the Crown- Native Fiduciary Relationship in Canada
- 3. The Incidents of Colonialism
- 4. The Legislative and Jurisprudential History of the Crown-Native Relationship in Canada
- 5. The Characterization of the Crown- Native Fiduciary Relationship by the Courts: Guerin v R
- 6. Judicial Characterizations of the Crown's Fiduciary Duty after Guerin
- 7. The Status of the Crown's Fiduciary Duty
- PART TWO. General Principles of Fiduciary Doctrine
- 8. A Re-examination of Fiduciary Doctrine
- 9. Fiduciary Theories
- 10. A 'Back to Basics' Approach to Fiduciary Doctrine
- PART THREE. The Crown's Fiduciary Duty towards Aboriginal Peoples in Canada
- 11. The British Crown's Obligations
- 12. The Canadian Crown's Obligations
- 13. Aboriginal Understandings of 'the Crown' and the Nexus between Governmental Power and Fiduciary Responsibility
- 14. Characteristics of the Crown-Native Fiduciary Relationship
- 15. The Practical Application of Fiduciary Doctrine in the Native Law Context: A Reappraisal of Kruger v R
- 16. Prospects for the Future
- APPENDICES
- Notes
- References
- Index