What Roe v. Wade Should Have Said : : The Nation's Top Legal Experts Rewrite America's Most Controversial Decision, Revised Edition / / ed. by Jack M. Balkin.
A unique introduction to the constitutional arguments for and against the right to abortionIn January 1973, the Supreme Court’s opinion in Roe v. Wade struck down most of the country's abortion laws and held for the first time that the Constitution guarantees women the right to safe and legal a...
Saved in:
| Superior document: | Title is part of eBook package: De Gruyter EBOOK PACKAGE COMPLETE 2023 English |
|---|---|
| MitwirkendeR: | |
| HerausgeberIn: | |
| Place / Publishing House: | New York, NY : : New York University Press, , [2023] ©2023 |
| Year of Publication: | 2023 |
| Language: | English |
| Online Access: | |
| Physical Description: | 1 online resource |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Table of Contents:
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Preface to the Revised Edition
- Part I Introduction
- Roe v. Wade: An Engine of Controversy
- Part II Revised Opinions in Roe v. Wade and Doe v. Bolton
- Chief Justice Balkin announced the judgment of the Court
- Siegel, J., concurring
- Tushnet, J., concurring
- Allen, J., concurring in the judgement
- Rubenfeld, J., concurring in the judgment except as to Doe
- West, J., concurring in the judgement
- Sunstein, J., concurring in the judgment
- Amar, J., concurring in Roe, dissenting in Doe
- Rosen, J., dissenting
- Collett, J., dissenting
- Paulsen, J., dissenting.
- Comments from the Contributors
- Appendix. The Constitution of the United States of America: Selected Provisions
- Roe v. Wade: A Selected Bibliography
- About the Contributors
- Table of Cases
- Index