In Dependence : : Women and the Patriarchal State in Revolutionary America / / Jacqueline Beatty.

• Superior document: Title is part of eBook package: De Gruyter EBOOK PACKAGE COMPLETE 2023 English
• VerfasserIn: Beatty, Jacqueline,
• Place / Publishing House: New York, NY : : New York University Press, , [2023]; ©2023
• Year of Publication: 2023
• Language: English
• Series: Early American Places ; 19
• Physical Description: 1 online resource :; 11 b/w illustrations
• Other title: Frontmatter --; Contents --; Introduction --; 1 Sympathy and the State --; 2 Independence in Dependence --; 3 Sole and Separate --; 4 Matriarchal Allies and Advocates --; 5 The Problem of Dependence --; 6 To Have and to Hold Herself --; 7 The Rights Revolution --; Conclusion: On Collaboration and Collective Action --; Acknowledgments --; A Note on Sources --; Abbreviations --; Notes --; Index --; About the Author
• Format: Mode of access: Internet via World Wide Web.
• ISBN: 9781479812134; 9783111319292; 9783111318912; 9783111319131; 9783111318189; 9783110751635
• DOI: 10.18574/nyu/9781479812134.001.0001
• Access: restricted access
• Hierarchical level: Monograph
• Statement of Responsibility: Jacqueline Beatty.

Examines the role of the American Revolution in the everyday lives of womenPatriarchal forces of law, finance, and social custom restricted women’s rights and agency in revolutionary America. Yet women in this period exploited these confines, transforming constraints into vehicles of female empowerment. Through a close reading of thousands of legislative, judicial, and institutional pleas across seventy years of history in three urban centers, Jacqueline Beatty illustrates the ways in which women in the revolutionary era asserted their status as dependents, demanding the protections owed to them as the assumed subordinates of men. In so doing, they claimed various forms of aid and assistance, won divorce suits, and defended themselves and their female friends in the face of patriarchal assumptions about their powerlessness. Ultimately, women in the revolutionary era were able to advocate for themselves and express a relative degree of power not in spite of their dependent status, but because of it.Their varying degrees of success in using these methods, however, was contingent on their race, class, and socio-economic status, and the degree to which their language and behavior conformed to assumptions of Anglo-American femininity. In Dependence thus exposes the central paradoxes inherent in American women’s social, legal, and economic positions of dependence in the Revolutionary era, complicating binary understandings of power and weakness, of agency and impotence, and of independence and dependence. Significantly, the American Revolution provided some women with the language and opportunities in which to claim old rights—the rights of dependents—in new ways. Most importantly, In Dependence shows how women’s coming to consciousness as rights-bearing individuals laid the groundwork for the activism and collective petitioning efforts of later generations of American feminists.