Judge and Jury in Imperial Brazil, 1808–1871 : : Social Control and Political Stability in the New State / / Thomas Flory.

• Superior document: Title is part of eBook package: De Gruyter University of Texas Press Complete eBook-Package Pre-2000
• VerfasserIn: Flory, Thomas,
• Place / Publishing House: Austin : : University of Texas Press, , [2021]; ©1981
• Year of Publication: 2021
• Language: English
• Series: LLILAS Latin American Monograph Series
• Physical Description: 1 online resource (284 p.)
• Other title: Frontmatter --; Contents --; Preface --; Acknowledgments --; Part I. Brazilian Liberalism and Justice in the Independence Period, 1808-1831 --; 1. Introduction: Liberalism in a Time of Transition --; 2. Reformist Thought and Brazilian Society --; 3. The Judicial Legacy --; Part II Reform, 1827-1837 --; 4. The Imperial Justice of the Peace --; 5. Judicial Personnel: The Justice of the Peace --; 6. The World of the Justice of the Peace --; 7. Legal Codes and the Jury System --; Part III. Reaction and the Counterreform, 1837-1871 --; 8. Reactionary Thought and Brazilian Society --; 9. Justice, Police, and Patronage, 1834-1841 --; 10. The Politics of Justice, 1841-1871 --; Conclusion --; Notes --; Bibliography --; Index
• Format: Mode of access: Internet via World Wide Web.
• ISBN: 9781477305935; 9783110745351
• DOI: 10.7560/740150
• Access: restricted access
• Hierarchical level: Monograph
• Statement of Responsibility: Thomas Flory.

In nineteenth-century Brazil the power of the courts rivaled that of the central government, bringing to it during its first half century of independence a stability unique in Latin America. Thomas Flory analyzes the Brazilian lower-court system, where the private interests of society and the public interests of the state intersected. Justices of the peace—lay judges elected at the parish level—played a special role in the early years of independence, for the post represented the triumph of Brazilian liberalism’s commitment to localism and decentralization. However, as Flory shows by tracing the social history and performance of parish judges, the institution actually intensified conflict within parishes to the point of destabilizing the local regime and proved to be so independent of national interests that it all but destroyed the state. By the 1840s the powers of the office were passed to state appointees, particularly the district judges. Flory recognizes these professional magistrates as a new elite who served as brokers between the state and the poorly articulated landowner elite, and his account of their rise reveals the mechanisms of state integration. In focusing on the judiciary, Flory has isolated a crucial aspect of Brazil’s early history, one with broad implications for the study of nineteenth-century Latin America as a whole. He combines social, intellectual, and political perspectives—as well as national-level discussion with scrutiny of parish-level implementation—and so makes sense of a complicated, little-studied period. The study clearly shows the progression of Brazilian social thought from a serene liberal faith in the people as a nation to an abiding, very modern distrust of that nation as a threat to the state.