Judging Democracy / / Christopher Manfredi, Mark Rush.
In Judging Democracy, Christopher Manfredi and Mark Rush challenge assertions that the Canadian and American Supreme Courts have taken radically different approaches to constitutional interpretation regarding general and democratic rights. Three case studies compare Canadian and American law concern...
Saved in:
Superior document: | Title is part of eBook package: De Gruyter University of Toronto Press eBook-Package Backlist 2000-2013 |
---|---|
VerfasserIn: | |
Place / Publishing House: | Toronto : : University of Toronto Press, , [2019] ©2013 |
Year of Publication: | 2019 |
Language: | English |
Online Access: | |
Physical Description: | 1 online resource (160 p.) |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
id |
9781442689756 |
---|---|
ctrlnum |
(DE-B1597)528828 (OCoLC)1110720325 |
collection |
bib_alma |
record_format |
marc |
spelling |
Manfredi, Christopher, author. aut http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut Judging Democracy / Christopher Manfredi, Mark Rush. Toronto : University of Toronto Press, [2019] ©2013 1 online resource (160 p.) text txt rdacontent computer c rdamedia online resource cr rdacarrier text file PDF rda Frontmatter -- Contents -- Acknowledgements -- Introduction -- Chapter One. Differences That Matter? -- Chapter Two. Of Real and "Self-Proclaimed" Democracies -- Chapter Three. The Scope and Definition of the Franchise -- Chapter Four. A Tale of Two Campaign Spending Decisions -- Chapter Five. Judicial Struggles with Democracy and the Unbearable Lightness of Process -- Bibliography -- Index restricted access http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_16ec online access with authorization star In Judging Democracy, Christopher Manfredi and Mark Rush challenge assertions that the Canadian and American Supreme Courts have taken radically different approaches to constitutional interpretation regarding general and democratic rights. Three case studies compare Canadian and American law concerning prisoners' voting rights, the scope and definition of voting rights, and campaign spending. These examples demonstrate that the two Supreme Courts have engaged in essentially the same debates concerning the franchise, access to the ballot, and the concept of a "meaningful" vote. They reveal that the American Supreme Court has never been entirely individualistic in its interpretation and protection of constitutional rights and that there are important similarities in the two Supreme Courts' approaches to constitutional interpretation. Furthermore, the authors demonstrate that an astonishing convergence has occurred in the two courts' thinking concerning the integrity of the democratic process and the need for the judiciary to monitor legislative attempts to regulate the political process in order to promote or ensure political equality. Growing numbers of justices in both courts are now wary of legislative attempts to cloak laws designed to protect incumbents through electoral reform. Judging Democracy thus points to a new direction not only in judicial review and constitutional interpretation but also in democratic theory. Issued also in print. Mode of access: Internet via World Wide Web. In English. Description based on online resource; title from PDF title page (publisher's Web site, viewed 30. Aug 2021) Constitutional law Canada Cases. Constitutional law United States Cases. Democracy Canada. Democracy United States. Election law Canada Cases. Election law United States Cases. Coursebook. POLITICAL SCIENCE / American Government / Judicial Branch. bisacsh Rush, Mark, author. aut http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut Title is part of eBook package: De Gruyter University of Toronto Press eBook-Package Backlist 2000-2013 9783110490954 print 9781551117027 https://doi.org/10.3138/9781442689756 https://www.degruyter.com/isbn/9781442689756 Cover https://www.degruyter.com/cover/covers/9781442689756.jpg |
language |
English |
format |
eBook |
author |
Manfredi, Christopher, Manfredi, Christopher, Rush, Mark, |
spellingShingle |
Manfredi, Christopher, Manfredi, Christopher, Rush, Mark, Judging Democracy / Frontmatter -- Contents -- Acknowledgements -- Introduction -- Chapter One. Differences That Matter? -- Chapter Two. Of Real and "Self-Proclaimed" Democracies -- Chapter Three. The Scope and Definition of the Franchise -- Chapter Four. A Tale of Two Campaign Spending Decisions -- Chapter Five. Judicial Struggles with Democracy and the Unbearable Lightness of Process -- Bibliography -- Index |
author_facet |
Manfredi, Christopher, Manfredi, Christopher, Rush, Mark, Rush, Mark, Rush, Mark, |
author_variant |
c m cm c m cm m r mr |
author_role |
VerfasserIn VerfasserIn VerfasserIn |
author2 |
Rush, Mark, Rush, Mark, |
author2_variant |
m r mr |
author2_role |
VerfasserIn VerfasserIn |
author_sort |
Manfredi, Christopher, |
title |
Judging Democracy / |
title_full |
Judging Democracy / Christopher Manfredi, Mark Rush. |
title_fullStr |
Judging Democracy / Christopher Manfredi, Mark Rush. |
title_full_unstemmed |
Judging Democracy / Christopher Manfredi, Mark Rush. |
title_auth |
Judging Democracy / |
title_alt |
Frontmatter -- Contents -- Acknowledgements -- Introduction -- Chapter One. Differences That Matter? -- Chapter Two. Of Real and "Self-Proclaimed" Democracies -- Chapter Three. The Scope and Definition of the Franchise -- Chapter Four. A Tale of Two Campaign Spending Decisions -- Chapter Five. Judicial Struggles with Democracy and the Unbearable Lightness of Process -- Bibliography -- Index |
title_new |
Judging Democracy / |
title_sort |
judging democracy / |
publisher |
University of Toronto Press, |
publishDate |
2019 |
physical |
1 online resource (160 p.) Issued also in print. |
contents |
Frontmatter -- Contents -- Acknowledgements -- Introduction -- Chapter One. Differences That Matter? -- Chapter Two. Of Real and "Self-Proclaimed" Democracies -- Chapter Three. The Scope and Definition of the Franchise -- Chapter Four. A Tale of Two Campaign Spending Decisions -- Chapter Five. Judicial Struggles with Democracy and the Unbearable Lightness of Process -- Bibliography -- Index |
isbn |
9781442689756 9783110490954 9781551117027 |
callnumber-first |
K - Law |
callnumber-subject |
KE - Canada |
callnumber-label |
KE4622 |
callnumber-sort |
KE 44622 M36 42008 |
genre_facet |
Cases. |
geographic_facet |
Canada United States Canada. United States. |
url |
https://doi.org/10.3138/9781442689756 https://www.degruyter.com/isbn/9781442689756 https://www.degruyter.com/cover/covers/9781442689756.jpg |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
dewey-hundreds |
300 - Social sciences |
dewey-tens |
340 - Law |
dewey-ones |
342 - Constitutional & administrative law |
dewey-full |
342.7107 |
dewey-sort |
3342.7107 |
dewey-raw |
342.7107 |
dewey-search |
342.7107 |
doi_str_mv |
10.3138/9781442689756 |
oclc_num |
1110720325 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT manfredichristopher judgingdemocracy AT rushmark judgingdemocracy |
status_str |
n |
ids_txt_mv |
(DE-B1597)528828 (OCoLC)1110720325 |
carrierType_str_mv |
cr |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Title is part of eBook package: De Gruyter University of Toronto Press eBook-Package Backlist 2000-2013 |
is_hierarchy_title |
Judging Democracy / |
container_title |
Title is part of eBook package: De Gruyter University of Toronto Press eBook-Package Backlist 2000-2013 |
author2_original_writing_str_mv |
noLinkedField noLinkedField |
_version_ |
1806143712000999424 |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>04651nam a22007815i 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">9781442689756</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-B1597</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20210830012106.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="006">m|||||o||d||||||||</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr || ||||||||</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">210830t20192013onc fo d z eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9781442689756</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.3138/9781442689756</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-B1597)528828</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1110720325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-B1597</subfield><subfield code="b">eng</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-B1597</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="044" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">onc</subfield><subfield code="c">CA-ON</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">KE4622.M36 2008</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="072" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">POL040030</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">342.7107</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Manfredi, Christopher, </subfield><subfield code="e">author.</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield><subfield code="4">http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Judging Democracy /</subfield><subfield code="c">Christopher Manfredi, Mark Rush.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Toronto : </subfield><subfield code="b">University of Toronto Press, </subfield><subfield code="c">[2019]</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="c">©2013</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 online resource (160 p.)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">computer</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">online resource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="347" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">text file</subfield><subfield code="b">PDF</subfield><subfield code="2">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="t">Frontmatter -- </subfield><subfield code="t">Contents -- </subfield><subfield code="t">Acknowledgements -- </subfield><subfield code="t">Introduction -- </subfield><subfield code="t">Chapter One. Differences That Matter? -- </subfield><subfield code="t">Chapter Two. Of Real and "Self-Proclaimed" Democracies -- </subfield><subfield code="t">Chapter Three. The Scope and Definition of the Franchise -- </subfield><subfield code="t">Chapter Four. A Tale of Two Campaign Spending Decisions -- </subfield><subfield code="t">Chapter Five. Judicial Struggles with Democracy and the Unbearable Lightness of Process -- </subfield><subfield code="t">Bibliography -- </subfield><subfield code="t">Index</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="506" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">restricted access</subfield><subfield code="u">http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_16ec</subfield><subfield code="f">online access with authorization</subfield><subfield code="2">star</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">In Judging Democracy, Christopher Manfredi and Mark Rush challenge assertions that the Canadian and American Supreme Courts have taken radically different approaches to constitutional interpretation regarding general and democratic rights. Three case studies compare Canadian and American law concerning prisoners' voting rights, the scope and definition of voting rights, and campaign spending. These examples demonstrate that the two Supreme Courts have engaged in essentially the same debates concerning the franchise, access to the ballot, and the concept of a "meaningful" vote. They reveal that the American Supreme Court has never been entirely individualistic in its interpretation and protection of constitutional rights and that there are important similarities in the two Supreme Courts' approaches to constitutional interpretation. Furthermore, the authors demonstrate that an astonishing convergence has occurred in the two courts' thinking concerning the integrity of the democratic process and the need for the judiciary to monitor legislative attempts to regulate the political process in order to promote or ensure political equality. Growing numbers of justices in both courts are now wary of legislative attempts to cloak laws designed to protect incumbents through electoral reform. Judging Democracy thus points to a new direction not only in judicial review and constitutional interpretation but also in democratic theory.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="530" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Issued also in print.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="538" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Mode of access: Internet via World Wide Web.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="546" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">In English.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="588" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Description based on online resource; title from PDF title page (publisher's Web site, viewed 30. Aug 2021)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Constitutional law</subfield><subfield code="z">Canada</subfield><subfield code="v">Cases.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Constitutional law</subfield><subfield code="z">United States</subfield><subfield code="v">Cases.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Democracy</subfield><subfield code="z">Canada.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Democracy</subfield><subfield code="z">United States.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Election law</subfield><subfield code="z">Canada</subfield><subfield code="v">Cases.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Election law</subfield><subfield code="z">United States</subfield><subfield code="v">Cases.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Coursebook.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">POLITICAL SCIENCE / American Government / Judicial Branch.</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Rush, Mark, </subfield><subfield code="e">author.</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield><subfield code="4">http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Title is part of eBook package:</subfield><subfield code="d">De Gruyter</subfield><subfield code="t">University of Toronto Press eBook-Package Backlist 2000-2013</subfield><subfield code="z">9783110490954</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="c">print</subfield><subfield code="z">9781551117027</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.3138/9781442689756</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://www.degruyter.com/isbn/9781442689756</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="3">Cover</subfield><subfield code="u">https://www.degruyter.com/cover/covers/9781442689756.jpg</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">978-3-11-049095-4 University of Toronto Press eBook-Package Backlist 2000-2013</subfield><subfield code="c">2000</subfield><subfield code="d">2013</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">EBA_BACKALL</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">EBA_CL_SN</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">EBA_EBACKALL</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">EBA_EBKALL</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">EBA_ECL_SN</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">EBA_EEBKALL</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">EBA_ESSHALL</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">EBA_PPALL</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">EBA_SSHALL</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">EBA_STMALL</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV-deGruyter-alles</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">PDA11SSHE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">PDA12STME</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">PDA13ENGE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">PDA17SSHEE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">PDA5EBK</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |