Deliberative Democracy for the Future : : The Case of Nuclear Waste Management in Canada / / Genevieve Fuji Johnson.

In today's world, public policies are increasingly associated with social and environmental risk and scientific uncertainty. Given such potential impacts on the moral freedom and equality for existing and future generations, policies should reflect decision-making standards beyond those of...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Superior document:Title is part of eBook package: De Gruyter University of Toronto Press eBook-Package Backlist 2000-2013
VerfasserIn:
Place / Publishing House:Toronto : : University of Toronto Press, , [2016]
©2008
Year of Publication:2016
Language:English
Series:Studies in Comparative Political Economy and Public Policy
Online Access:
Physical Description:1 online resource (240 p.)
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
LEADER 05387nam a22007575i 4500
001 9781442687837
003 DE-B1597
005 20210830012106.0
006 m|||||o||d||||||||
007 cr || ||||||||
008 210830t20162008onc fo d z eng d
019 |a (OCoLC)1013961145 
020 |a 9781442687837 
024 7 |a 10.3138/9781442687837  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-B1597)465398 
035 |a (OCoLC)944176846 
040 |a DE-B1597  |b eng  |c DE-B1597  |e rda 
041 0 |a eng 
044 |a onc  |c CA-ON 
050 4 |a TD898.13.C3  |b J63 2008eb 
072 7 |a POL016000  |2 bisacsh 
082 0 4 |a 363.72/8960971 
100 1 |a Fuji Johnson, Genevieve,   |e author.  |4 aut  |4 http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut 
245 1 0 |a Deliberative Democracy for the Future :  |b The Case of Nuclear Waste Management in Canada /  |c Genevieve Fuji Johnson. 
264 1 |a Toronto :   |b University of Toronto Press,   |c [2016] 
264 4 |c ©2008 
300 |a 1 online resource (240 p.) 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
347 |a text file  |b PDF  |2 rda 
490 0 |a Studies in Comparative Political Economy and Public Policy 
505 0 0 |t Frontmatter --   |t Contents --   |t Acknowledgments --   |t Abbreviations --   |t 1. Introduction --   |t 2. Ethical Policy Analysis and Its Importance --   |t 3. Canadian Nuclear Fuel Waste Management Policy: A Discourse of Two Coalitions --   |t 4. Ethical Issues in Canadian Nuclear Fuel Waste Management Policy --   |t 5. Ethical Schools: Welfare Utilitarianism, Modern Deontology, and Deliberative Democracy --   |t 6. The Promises and Pitfalls of Deliberative Democratic Policy Analysis --   |t Notes --   |t Bibliography --   |t Index --   |t Backmatter 
506 0 |a restricted access  |u http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_16ec  |f online access with authorization  |2 star 
520 |a In today's world, public policies are increasingly associated with social and environmental risk and scientific uncertainty. Given such potential impacts on the moral freedom and equality for existing and future generations, policies should reflect decision-making standards beyond those of economic efficiency and technical safety. They should reflect the imperatives of social justice and democratic legitimacy now and into the future.Deliberative Democracy for the Future identifies an approach to ethical policy analysis that promises to serve the ends of justice and legitimacy in areas of public policy such as hazardous waste management, energy generation and regulation, climate change control, and genomics research and commercialization. Based on a wide reading of ethical approaches to policy analysis found in contemporary political theory, moral philosophy, and public policy literatures, it evaluates these three central approaches to ethical policy analysis in light of moral dilemmas arising in a particularly timely case: Canadian nuclear waste management policy.The volume's central argument is that the most desirable approach to ethical policy analysis contains the philosophical tools necessary to address problems of understanding risk and safety, identifying obligations to both existing and future generations, and conceptualizing legitimacy-conferring decision-making processes. Genevieve Fuji Johnson argues that neither welfare utilitarianism nor modern deontology is sufficiently equipped for these tasks. She proposes that only deliberative democracy contains convincing conceptions of the good, justice, and legitimacy that provide for the justifiable resolution of debates about the moral foundations of public policy. Responding to challenges in nuclear waste management in ways more comprehensive and more tenable than both utilitarianism and deontology, deliberative policy analysis promises to be an effective approach to other cases associated with risk, uncertainty, and futurity. 
530 |a Issued also in print. 
538 |a Mode of access: Internet via World Wide Web. 
546 |a In English. 
588 0 |a Description based on online resource; title from PDF title page (publisher's Web site, viewed 30. Aug 2021) 
650 0 |a Deliberative democracy  |z Canada. 
650 0 |a Radioactive waste disposal  |x Government policy  |z Canada. 
650 0 |a Radioactive waste disposal  |x Moral and ethical aspects  |z Canada. 
650 0 |a Radioactive waste disposal  |x Risk assessment  |z Canada. 
650 7 |a POLITICAL SCIENCE / Political Process / General.  |2 bisacsh 
773 0 8 |i Title is part of eBook package:  |d De Gruyter  |t University of Toronto Press eBook-Package Backlist 2000-2013  |z 9783110490954 
776 0 |c print  |z 9780802090324 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.3138/9781442687837 
856 4 0 |u https://www.degruyter.com/isbn/9781442687837 
856 4 2 |3 Cover  |u https://www.degruyter.com/cover/covers/9781442687837.jpg 
912 |a 978-3-11-049095-4 University of Toronto Press eBook-Package Backlist 2000-2013  |c 2000  |d 2013 
912 |a EBA_BACKALL 
912 |a EBA_CL_SN 
912 |a EBA_EBACKALL 
912 |a EBA_EBKALL 
912 |a EBA_ECL_SN 
912 |a EBA_EEBKALL 
912 |a EBA_ESSHALL 
912 |a EBA_PPALL 
912 |a EBA_SSHALL 
912 |a EBA_STMALL 
912 |a GBV-deGruyter-alles 
912 |a PDA11SSHE 
912 |a PDA12STME 
912 |a PDA13ENGE 
912 |a PDA17SSHEE 
912 |a PDA5EBK