Empirical Gap in Jurisprudence : : A Comprehensive Study of the Supreme Court of Canada / / Daved Muttart.
In jurisprudential writing, single decisions are often held up as representative without any evidence to support their representative claims. In order to address this problem, Daved Muttart has made a systematic study encompassing every judgment of the Supreme Court of Canada between 1950 and 2003.E...
Saved in:
Superior document: | Title is part of eBook package: De Gruyter University of Toronto Press eBook-Package Backlist 2000-2013 |
---|---|
VerfasserIn: | |
Place / Publishing House: | Toronto : : University of Toronto Press, , [2016] ©2007 |
Year of Publication: | 2016 |
Language: | English |
Series: | Heritage
|
Online Access: | |
Physical Description: | 1 online resource (276 p.) |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
id |
9781442684898 |
---|---|
ctrlnum |
(DE-B1597)464079 (OCoLC)944177125 |
collection |
bib_alma |
record_format |
marc |
spelling |
Muttart, Daved, author. aut http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut Empirical Gap in Jurisprudence : A Comprehensive Study of the Supreme Court of Canada / Daved Muttart. Toronto : University of Toronto Press, [2016] ©2007 1 online resource (276 p.) text txt rdacontent computer c rdamedia online resource cr rdacarrier text file PDF rda Heritage Frontmatter -- Contents -- Tables and Figures -- Preface -- Acknowledgments -- Section I. Setting the Stage -- 1. Introduction -- 2. Possible Solutions: Case Study of the Supreme Court of Canada -- 3. Beginning to Close the Empirical Gap -- Section II. Measuring the Court's Decisions -- 4. Fact, Law, and Policy -- 5. Modes of Legal Reasoning -- 6. Changing the Law -- 7. Other Trends: Bright Lines to Principles -- 8. Judicial Attitudes and Other Interesting Findings -- 9. Charter Cases Are Different -- Section III. Testing Theories -- 10. How Judges Judge: Testing Legal Theory -- 11. Is Legal Reasoning Autonomous? -- 12. Is the Supreme Court of Canada 'Too' Activist? -- 13. Conclusion: The Gap Has Been Narrowed -- Notes -- Glossary -- Bibliography -- Index restricted access http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_16ec online access with authorization star In jurisprudential writing, single decisions are often held up as representative without any evidence to support their representative claims. In order to address this problem, Daved Muttart has made a systematic study encompassing every judgment of the Supreme Court of Canada between 1950 and 2003.Examining almost 5000 cases, Muttart analyses these Supreme Court decisions employing several important criteria including whether the decisions overruled prior precedent, the extent to which they were decided on fact, law, or policy, and the legal and extra-legal modes of reasoning utilized by the Court. Muttart uses the results of this systematic examination to test the validity of extant jurisprudential theories. Ultimately, he concludes that the Court's method of operation is evolving as it moves into a new century. While the court's reasoning is becoming less foundational, it remains a predominantly legal, as opposed to political, institution.Filling an important niche in the study of jurisprudence, The Empirical Gap in Jurisprudence demonstrates that systematic studies based on large samples of cases will yield many insights that were obfuscated by prior efforts that relied on small and self-selected samples. Issued also in print. Mode of access: Internet via World Wide Web. In English. Description based on online resource; title from PDF title page (publisher's Web site, viewed 30. Aug 2021) Judgments Canada. Judicial process Canada. LAW / Courts. bisacsh Title is part of eBook package: De Gruyter University of Toronto Press eBook-Package Backlist 2000-2013 9783110490954 print 9780802091598 https://doi.org/10.3138/9781442684898 https://www.degruyter.com/isbn/9781442684898 Cover https://www.degruyter.com/cover/covers/9781442684898.jpg |
language |
English |
format |
eBook |
author |
Muttart, Daved, Muttart, Daved, |
spellingShingle |
Muttart, Daved, Muttart, Daved, Empirical Gap in Jurisprudence : A Comprehensive Study of the Supreme Court of Canada / Heritage Frontmatter -- Contents -- Tables and Figures -- Preface -- Acknowledgments -- Section I. Setting the Stage -- 1. Introduction -- 2. Possible Solutions: Case Study of the Supreme Court of Canada -- 3. Beginning to Close the Empirical Gap -- Section II. Measuring the Court's Decisions -- 4. Fact, Law, and Policy -- 5. Modes of Legal Reasoning -- 6. Changing the Law -- 7. Other Trends: Bright Lines to Principles -- 8. Judicial Attitudes and Other Interesting Findings -- 9. Charter Cases Are Different -- Section III. Testing Theories -- 10. How Judges Judge: Testing Legal Theory -- 11. Is Legal Reasoning Autonomous? -- 12. Is the Supreme Court of Canada 'Too' Activist? -- 13. Conclusion: The Gap Has Been Narrowed -- Notes -- Glossary -- Bibliography -- Index |
author_facet |
Muttart, Daved, Muttart, Daved, |
author_variant |
d m dm d m dm |
author_role |
VerfasserIn VerfasserIn |
author_sort |
Muttart, Daved, |
title |
Empirical Gap in Jurisprudence : A Comprehensive Study of the Supreme Court of Canada / |
title_sub |
A Comprehensive Study of the Supreme Court of Canada / |
title_full |
Empirical Gap in Jurisprudence : A Comprehensive Study of the Supreme Court of Canada / Daved Muttart. |
title_fullStr |
Empirical Gap in Jurisprudence : A Comprehensive Study of the Supreme Court of Canada / Daved Muttart. |
title_full_unstemmed |
Empirical Gap in Jurisprudence : A Comprehensive Study of the Supreme Court of Canada / Daved Muttart. |
title_auth |
Empirical Gap in Jurisprudence : A Comprehensive Study of the Supreme Court of Canada / |
title_alt |
Frontmatter -- Contents -- Tables and Figures -- Preface -- Acknowledgments -- Section I. Setting the Stage -- 1. Introduction -- 2. Possible Solutions: Case Study of the Supreme Court of Canada -- 3. Beginning to Close the Empirical Gap -- Section II. Measuring the Court's Decisions -- 4. Fact, Law, and Policy -- 5. Modes of Legal Reasoning -- 6. Changing the Law -- 7. Other Trends: Bright Lines to Principles -- 8. Judicial Attitudes and Other Interesting Findings -- 9. Charter Cases Are Different -- Section III. Testing Theories -- 10. How Judges Judge: Testing Legal Theory -- 11. Is Legal Reasoning Autonomous? -- 12. Is the Supreme Court of Canada 'Too' Activist? -- 13. Conclusion: The Gap Has Been Narrowed -- Notes -- Glossary -- Bibliography -- Index |
title_new |
Empirical Gap in Jurisprudence : |
title_sort |
empirical gap in jurisprudence : a comprehensive study of the supreme court of canada / |
series |
Heritage |
series2 |
Heritage |
publisher |
University of Toronto Press, |
publishDate |
2016 |
physical |
1 online resource (276 p.) Issued also in print. |
contents |
Frontmatter -- Contents -- Tables and Figures -- Preface -- Acknowledgments -- Section I. Setting the Stage -- 1. Introduction -- 2. Possible Solutions: Case Study of the Supreme Court of Canada -- 3. Beginning to Close the Empirical Gap -- Section II. Measuring the Court's Decisions -- 4. Fact, Law, and Policy -- 5. Modes of Legal Reasoning -- 6. Changing the Law -- 7. Other Trends: Bright Lines to Principles -- 8. Judicial Attitudes and Other Interesting Findings -- 9. Charter Cases Are Different -- Section III. Testing Theories -- 10. How Judges Judge: Testing Legal Theory -- 11. Is Legal Reasoning Autonomous? -- 12. Is the Supreme Court of Canada 'Too' Activist? -- 13. Conclusion: The Gap Has Been Narrowed -- Notes -- Glossary -- Bibliography -- Index |
isbn |
9781442684898 9783110490954 9780802091598 |
callnumber-first |
K - Law |
callnumber-subject |
KE - Canada |
callnumber-label |
KE8244 |
callnumber-sort |
KE 48244 M88 42007 |
geographic_facet |
Canada. |
url |
https://doi.org/10.3138/9781442684898 https://www.degruyter.com/isbn/9781442684898 https://www.degruyter.com/cover/covers/9781442684898.jpg |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
dewey-hundreds |
300 - Social sciences |
dewey-tens |
340 - Law |
dewey-ones |
347 - Civil procedure & courts |
dewey-full |
347.71/035 |
dewey-sort |
3347.71 235 |
dewey-raw |
347.71/035 |
dewey-search |
347.71/035 |
doi_str_mv |
10.3138/9781442684898 |
oclc_num |
944177125 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT muttartdaved empiricalgapinjurisprudenceacomprehensivestudyofthesupremecourtofcanada |
status_str |
n |
ids_txt_mv |
(DE-B1597)464079 (OCoLC)944177125 |
carrierType_str_mv |
cr |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Title is part of eBook package: De Gruyter University of Toronto Press eBook-Package Backlist 2000-2013 |
is_hierarchy_title |
Empirical Gap in Jurisprudence : A Comprehensive Study of the Supreme Court of Canada / |
container_title |
Title is part of eBook package: De Gruyter University of Toronto Press eBook-Package Backlist 2000-2013 |
_version_ |
1770176833470332929 |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>04637nam a22007575i 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">9781442684898</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-B1597</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20210830012106.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="006">m|||||o||d||||||||</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr || ||||||||</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">210830t20162007onc fo d z eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="019" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1013966673</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9781442684898</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.3138/9781442684898</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-B1597)464079</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)944177125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-B1597</subfield><subfield code="b">eng</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-B1597</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="044" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">onc</subfield><subfield code="c">CA-ON</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">KE8244</subfield><subfield code="b">.M88 2007</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="072" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">LAW025000</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">347.71/035</subfield><subfield code="2">22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Muttart, Daved, </subfield><subfield code="e">author.</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield><subfield code="4">http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Empirical Gap in Jurisprudence :</subfield><subfield code="b">A Comprehensive Study of the Supreme Court of Canada /</subfield><subfield code="c">Daved Muttart.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Toronto : </subfield><subfield code="b">University of Toronto Press, </subfield><subfield code="c">[2016]</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="c">©2007</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 online resource (276 p.)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">computer</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">online resource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="347" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">text file</subfield><subfield code="b">PDF</subfield><subfield code="2">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Heritage</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="t">Frontmatter -- </subfield><subfield code="t">Contents -- </subfield><subfield code="t">Tables and Figures -- </subfield><subfield code="t">Preface -- </subfield><subfield code="t">Acknowledgments -- </subfield><subfield code="t">Section I. Setting the Stage -- </subfield><subfield code="t">1. Introduction -- </subfield><subfield code="t">2. Possible Solutions: Case Study of the Supreme Court of Canada -- </subfield><subfield code="t">3. Beginning to Close the Empirical Gap -- </subfield><subfield code="t">Section II. Measuring the Court's Decisions -- </subfield><subfield code="t">4. Fact, Law, and Policy -- </subfield><subfield code="t">5. Modes of Legal Reasoning -- </subfield><subfield code="t">6. Changing the Law -- </subfield><subfield code="t">7. Other Trends: Bright Lines to Principles -- </subfield><subfield code="t">8. Judicial Attitudes and Other Interesting Findings -- </subfield><subfield code="t">9. Charter Cases Are Different -- </subfield><subfield code="t">Section III. Testing Theories -- </subfield><subfield code="t">10. How Judges Judge: Testing Legal Theory -- </subfield><subfield code="t">11. Is Legal Reasoning Autonomous? -- </subfield><subfield code="t">12. Is the Supreme Court of Canada 'Too' Activist? -- </subfield><subfield code="t">13. Conclusion: The Gap Has Been Narrowed -- </subfield><subfield code="t">Notes -- </subfield><subfield code="t">Glossary -- </subfield><subfield code="t">Bibliography -- </subfield><subfield code="t">Index</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="506" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">restricted access</subfield><subfield code="u">http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_16ec</subfield><subfield code="f">online access with authorization</subfield><subfield code="2">star</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">In jurisprudential writing, single decisions are often held up as representative without any evidence to support their representative claims. In order to address this problem, Daved Muttart has made a systematic study encompassing every judgment of the Supreme Court of Canada between 1950 and 2003.Examining almost 5000 cases, Muttart analyses these Supreme Court decisions employing several important criteria including whether the decisions overruled prior precedent, the extent to which they were decided on fact, law, or policy, and the legal and extra-legal modes of reasoning utilized by the Court. Muttart uses the results of this systematic examination to test the validity of extant jurisprudential theories. Ultimately, he concludes that the Court's method of operation is evolving as it moves into a new century. While the court's reasoning is becoming less foundational, it remains a predominantly legal, as opposed to political, institution.Filling an important niche in the study of jurisprudence, The Empirical Gap in Jurisprudence demonstrates that systematic studies based on large samples of cases will yield many insights that were obfuscated by prior efforts that relied on small and self-selected samples.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="530" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Issued also in print.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="538" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Mode of access: Internet via World Wide Web.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="546" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">In English.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="588" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Description based on online resource; title from PDF title page (publisher's Web site, viewed 30. Aug 2021)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Judgments</subfield><subfield code="z">Canada.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Judicial process</subfield><subfield code="z">Canada.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">LAW / Courts.</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Title is part of eBook package:</subfield><subfield code="d">De Gruyter</subfield><subfield code="t">University of Toronto Press eBook-Package Backlist 2000-2013</subfield><subfield code="z">9783110490954</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="c">print</subfield><subfield code="z">9780802091598</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.3138/9781442684898</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://www.degruyter.com/isbn/9781442684898</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="3">Cover</subfield><subfield code="u">https://www.degruyter.com/cover/covers/9781442684898.jpg</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">978-3-11-049095-4 University of Toronto Press eBook-Package Backlist 2000-2013</subfield><subfield code="c">2000</subfield><subfield code="d">2013</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">EBA_BACKALL</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">EBA_CL_LAEC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">EBA_EBACKALL</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">EBA_EBKALL</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">EBA_ECL_LAEC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">EBA_EEBKALL</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">EBA_ESSHALL</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">EBA_ESTMALL</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">EBA_PPALL</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">EBA_SSHALL</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">EBA_STMALL</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV-deGruyter-alles</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">PDA11SSHE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">PDA12STME</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">PDA13ENGE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">PDA17SSHEE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">PDA18STMEE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">PDA5EBK</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |