The Capacity To Judge : : Public Opinion and Deliberative Democracy in Upper Canada,1791-1854 / / Jeffrey McNairn.

• VerfasserIn: McNairn, Jeffrey,
• Place / Publishing House: Toronto : : University of Toronto Press, , [2017]; ©2000
• Year of Publication: 2017
• Language: English
• Series: Heritage
• Physical Description: 1 online resource (480 p.)
• Other title: Frontmatter --; Contents --; Preface --; Introduction --; Part One. Creating a Public --; Chapter I: 'The very image and transcript': Transplanting the Ancient Constitution --; Chapter II. Experiments in Democratic Sociability: The Political Significance of Voluntary Associations --; Chapter III. 'The most powerful engine of the human mind': The Press and Its Readers --; Chapter IV. 'A united public opinion that must be obeyed': The Politics of Public Opinion --; Part Two. Debating the Alternatives --; Chapter V. 'We are become in every thing but name, a Republic': The Metcalfe Crisis and the Demise of Mixed Monarchy --; Chapter VI. Publius of the North: Tory Republicanism and the American Constitution --; Chapter VII. Mistaking 'the shadow for the substance': Laying the Foundations of Parliamentary Government --; Chapter VIII. 'Its success ... must depend on the force of public opinion': Primogeniture and the Necessity of Debate --; Conclusions and Speculative Questions --; Bibliography of Printed Primary Sources --; Illustration Credits --; Index
• Format: Mode of access: Internet via World Wide Web.
• ISBN: 9781442680623
• DOI: 10.3138/9781442680623
• Access: restricted access
• Hierarchical level: Monograph
• Statement of Responsibility: Jeffrey McNairn.

By the mid-nineteenth-century, 'public opinion' emerged as a new form of authority in Upper Canada. Contemporaries came to believe that the best answer to common questions arose from deliberation among private individuals. Older conceptions of government, sociability and the relationship between knowledge and power were jettisoned for a new image of Upper Canada as a deliberative democracy. The Capacity to Judge asks what made widespread public debate about common issues possible; why it came to be seen as desirable, even essential; and how it was integrated into Upper Canada's constitutional and social self-image. Drawing on an international body of literature indebted to Jürgen Habermas and based on extensive research in period newspapers, Jeffrey L. McNairn argues that voluntary associations and the press created a reading public capable of reasoning on matters of state, and that the dynamics of political conflict invested that public with final authority. He traces how contemporaries grappled with the consequences as they scrutinized parliamentary, republican and radical options for institutionalizing public opinion. The Capacity to Judge concludes with a case study of deliberative democracy in action that serves as a sustained defense of the type of intellectual history the book as a whole exemplifies.