Mi'kmaq Treaties on Trial : : History, Land, and Donald Marshall Junior / / William C. Wicken.

In 1725-6 the British colonial government of Nova Scotia signed a treaty of friendship and peace with the local Mi'kmaq people. This treaty explicitly acknowledged the co-existence of Mi'kmaq and British law - but much of its meaning stemmed from its complex negotiation, which was influenc...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
VerfasserIn:
Place / Publishing House:Toronto : : University of Toronto Press, , [2018]
©2002
Year of Publication:2018
Language:English
Online Access:
Physical Description:1 online resource (336 p.)
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Other title:Frontmatter --
Contents --
Acknowledgments --
Introduction --
PART ONE The Mi'kmaq in 1726 --
25 November 1993, Halifax, Nova Scotia --
Chapter One. The Mi'kmaq and Land --
Chapter Two. The Mi'kmaq Polity --
PART TWO: The 1726 Treaty --
Article of Peace and Agreement: Annapolis Royal 1726 --
Reciprocal Promises Made by Captain John Doucett: 1726 --
21 November 1994, Antigonish, Nova Scotia --
Chapter Three. The Genesis of the 1726 Treaty: The Wabanaki-New England War of 1722-1725 --
Chapter Four. The Languages of Communication --
Chapter Five. The 1726 Treaty and Utrecht --
Chapter Six. Establishing Laws, Establishing Relationships --
Chapter Seven. British Politics and Treaty Making --
PART THREE: Renewing the 1726 Treaty --
Treaty of Peace and Friendship --
February 1996, Halifax, Nova Scotia --
Chapter Eight. The Founding of Halifax: Re-interpreting the 1726 Treaty --
Chapter Nine. The 1760-1761 Treaties --
PART FOUR: The 1726 Treaty in History and Law --
27 June 1996, Antigonish, Nova Scotia --
Conclusion --
September to November 1999 --
Glossary of Names --
Glossary of Places --
Notes --
Bibliography --
Illustration Credits --
Index
Summary:In 1725-6 the British colonial government of Nova Scotia signed a treaty of friendship and peace with the local Mi'kmaq people. This treaty explicitly acknowledged the co-existence of Mi'kmaq and British law - but much of its meaning stemmed from its complex negotiation, which was influenced by the history of aboriginal-European relations in Acadia prior to 1726. William Wicken argues that after 1749 a more forceful British military presence led officials to re-interpret the treaty in the light of its own interests.From 1994 to 1996, the author was an expert witness for the defence at the Marshall trial, during which the Supreme Court of Canada integrated aboriginal perspectives on treaty-making into current interpretations. Dr Wicken was one of the historians who gathered and presented the historical evidence to the court. This timely and original work intersperses close analysis of the 1726 treaty with discussions of the Marshall case, and shows how the inter-cultural relationships and power dynamics of the past, have shaped both the law and the social climate of the present. The author argues that the treaties must be viewed in their historical context, and that of the oral tradition of Mi'kmaq people, to be properly understood.Current high-profile legal cases involving aboriginal rights lend this work a special significance among the legal and academic communities, where it is destined to spark debate. It is of particular relevance to history and native studies students.
Format:Mode of access: Internet via World Wide Web.
ISBN:9781442670211
DOI:10.3138/9781442670211
Access:restricted access
Hierarchical level:Monograph
Statement of Responsibility: William C. Wicken.