Ideal Government and the Mixed Constitution in the Middle Ages / / James M. Blythe.

• Superior document: Title is part of eBook package: De Gruyter Princeton Legacy Lib. eBook Package 1980-1999
• VerfasserIn: Blythe, James M.,
• Place / Publishing House: Princeton, NJ : : Princeton University Press, , [2014]; ©1992
• Year of Publication: 2014
• Edition: Course Book
• Language: English
• Series: Princeton Legacy Library ; 184
• Physical Description: 1 online resource (362 p.)
• Other title: Frontmatter --; CONTENTS --; Preface --; Acknowledgments --; PART 1: The Mixed Constitution --; CHAPTER 1. Introduction --; CHAPTER 2. The Mixed Constitution in Antiquity and the Early Middle Ages --; PART 2: Thomas Aquinas and His Successors --; CHAPTER 3. Thomas Aquinas --; CHAPTER 4. Giles of Rome --; CHAPTER 5. Peter of Auvergne --; CHAPTER 6. Ptolemy of Lucca --; CHAPTER 7. Engelbert of Admont --; CHAPTER 8. John of Paris --; PART 3: The Fourteenth Century --; CHAPTER 9. Aristotelian Political Thought in the Fourteenth Century --; CHAPTER 10. Relativism and the Best Polity --; CHAPTER 11. Kingship, Popular Sovereignty, and the Mixed Constitution --; CHAPTER 12. Nicole Oresme and the Synthesis of Aristotelian Political Thought --; PART 4: The Fifteenth Century and the Early Modern Period --; CHAPTER 13. Conciliarism --; CHAPTER 14. Later Theories of Mixed Government in England and Northern Europe --; CHAPTER 15. The Mixed Constitution and Italian Republicanism --; CHAPTER 16. Conclusion --; Bibliography --; Index
• Format: Mode of access: Internet via World Wide Web.
• ISBN: 9781400862603; 9783110413441; 9783110413663; 9783110442496
• DOI: 10.1515/9781400862603
• Access: restricted access
• Hierarchical level: Monograph
• Statement of Responsibility: James M. Blythe.

Ancient Greeks and Romans often wrote that the best form of government consists of a mixture of monarchy, aristocracy, and democracy. Political writers in the early modern period applied this idea to government in England, Venice, and Florence, and Americans used it in designing their constitution. In this history of political thought James Blythe investigates what happened to the concept of mixed constitution during the Middle Ages, when the work of the Greek historian Polybius, the source of many of the formal elements of early modern theory, was unknown in Latin. Although it is generally argued that Renaissance and early modern theories of mixed constitution derived from the revival of classical Polybian models, Blythe demonstrates the pervasiveness of such ideas in high and late medieval thought. The author traces medieval Aristotelian theories concerning the best form of government and concludes that most endorsed a limited monarchy sharing many features with the mixed constitution. He also shows that the major early modern ideas of mixed constitutionalism stemmed from medieval and Aristotelian thought, which partially explains the enthusiastic reception of Polybius in the sixteenth century.Originally published in 1992.The Princeton Legacy Library uses the latest print-on-demand technology to again make available previously out-of-print books from the distinguished backlist of Princeton University Press. These editions preserve the original texts of these important books while presenting them in durable paperback and hardcover editions. The goal of the Princeton Legacy Library is to vastly increase access to the rich scholarly heritage found in the thousands of books published by Princeton University Press since its founding in 1905.