In Pursuit of the PhD / / Neil L. Rudenstine, William G. Bowen.

What percentage of graduate students entering PhD programs in the arts and sciences at leading universities actually complete their studies? How do completion rates vary by field of study, scale of graduate program, and type of financial support provided to students? Has the increasing reliance on T...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Superior document:Title is part of eBook package: De Gruyter Princeton Legacy Lib. eBook Package 1980-1999
VerfasserIn:
MitwirkendeR:
Place / Publishing House:Princeton, NJ : : Princeton University Press, , [2014]
©1992
Year of Publication:2014
Edition:Course Book
Language:English
Series:The William G. Bowen Series ; 75
Online Access:
Physical Description:1 online resource (466 p.)
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Other title:Frontmatter --
Contents --
List of Figures --
List of Tables --
Preface --
CHAPTER ONE. Introduction and Principal Findings --
PART ONE. Trends in Graduate Education --
CHAPTER TWO. Recipients of Doctorates --
CHAPTER THREE. The BA-PhD Nexus --
CHAPTER FOUR. Graduate Programs: The Dual Questions of Quality and Scale --
CHAPTER FIVE. The Evolution of Selected Tier I Programs in the EHP Fields --
PART TWO. Factors Affecting Outcomes --
CHAPTER SIX. Completion Rates and Time-to-Degree: Concepts and General Patterns --
CHAPTER SEVEN. Fields of Study --
CHAPTER EIGHT. Scale of Graduate Program --
CHAPTER NINE. Student-Year Cost and Its Components --
PART THREE. Policies and Program Design --
CHAPTER TEN. Financial Support for Graduate Students --
CHAPTER ELEVEN. National Fellowship Programs --
CHAPTER TWELVE. Requirements and Program Content --
CHAPTER THIRTEEN. Program Design, Oversight, and "Culture" --
CHAPTER FOURTEEN. Recommendations --
APPENDIX A. The Ten-University Data Set --
APPENDIX B. The National Fellowship Data Set --
APPENDIX C. Survey of Mellon Fellows in the Humanities --
APPENDIX D Measuring Time to the Doctorate: Reinterpretation of the Evidence --
APPENDIX E. Time-to-Degree and Faculty Promotion: A Study of Faculty Promoted to Tenure at Four Universities and Three Colleges, 1980-81 to 1989-90 --
APPENDIX F. Theory and Its Reverberations --
APPENDIX G. Additional Tables --
Definitions of Frequently Used Terms --
References Cited --
Index
Summary:What percentage of graduate students entering PhD programs in the arts and sciences at leading universities actually complete their studies? How do completion rates vary by field of study, scale of graduate program, and type of financial support provided to students? Has the increasing reliance on Teaching Assistantships affected completion rates and time-to-degree? How successful have national fellowship programs been in encouraging students to finish their studies in reasonably short periods of time? What have been the effects of curricular developments and shifts in the state of the job market? How has the overall "system" of graduate education been affected by the expansion of the 1960s and the subsequent contraction in enrollments and degrees conferred? Is there "excess capacity" in the system at the present time? This major study seeks to answer fundamental questions of this kind. It is based on an exhaustive analysis of an unparalleled data set consisting of the experiences in graduate school of more than 35,000 students who entered programs in English, history, political science, economics, mathematics, and physics at ten leading universities between 1962 and 1986. In addition, new information has been obtained on the graduate student careers of more than 13,000 winners of prestigious national fellowships such as the Woodrow Wilson and the Danforth. It is the combination of these original data sets with other sources of national data that permits fresh insights into the processes and outcomes of graduate education. The authors conclude that opportunities to achieve significant improvements in the organization and functioning of graduate programs exist--especially in the humanities and related social sciences--and the final part of the book contains their policy recommendations. This will be the standard reference on graduate education for years to come, and it should be read and studied by everyone concerned with the future of graduate education in the United States.Originally published in 1992.The Princeton Legacy Library uses the latest print-on-demand technology to again make available previously out-of-print books from the distinguished backlist of Princeton University Press. These editions preserve the original texts of these important books while presenting them in durable paperback and hardcover editions. The goal of the Princeton Legacy Library is to vastly increase access to the rich scholarly heritage found in the thousands of books published by Princeton University Press since its founding in 1905.
Format:Mode of access: Internet via World Wide Web.
ISBN:9781400862474
9783110413441
9783110413601
9783110442496
DOI:10.1515/9781400862474
Access:restricted access
Hierarchical level:Monograph
Statement of Responsibility: Neil L. Rudenstine, William G. Bowen.