Locke on Personal Identity : : Consciousness and Concernment - Updated Edition / / Galen Strawson.

John Locke's theory of personal identity underlies all modern discussion of the nature of persons and selves-yet it is widely thought to be wrong. In this book, Galen Strawson argues that in fact it is Locke's critics who are wrong, and that the famous objections to his theory are invalid....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Superior document:Title is part of eBook package: De Gruyter PUP eBook-Package Pilot Project 2014-2015
VerfasserIn:
TeilnehmendeR:
Place / Publishing House:Princeton, NJ : : Princeton University Press, , [2014]
©2014
Year of Publication:2014
Edition:Updated edition with a New Preface
Language:English
Series:Princeton Monographs in Philosophy ; 42
Online Access:
Physical Description:1 online resource :; 4 line illus.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Other title:Frontmatter --
Contents --
Preface --
Chapter One. Introduction --
Chapter Two. "Person" --
Chapter Three. "Person . . . is a forensic term" --
Chapter Four. Concernment --
Chapter Five. Consciousness --
Chapter Six. "Consciousness . . . is inseparable from thinking" --
Chapter Seven. "From the inside" --
Chapter Eight. "Person"-Locke's Definition --
Chapter Nine. Consciousness Is Not Memory --
Chapter Ten. Personal Identity --
Chapter Eleven. Psychological Connectedness --
Chapter Twelve. Transition (Butler Dismissed) --
Chapter Thirteen. " But next . . . ": Personal Identity without Substantial Continuity --
Chapter Fourteen. "And therefore . . . ": [I]-transfers, [Ag]-transfers, [P]-transfers --
Chapter Fifteen. "A fatal error of theirs" --
Chapter Sixteen. A Fatal Error of Locke's? --
Chapter Seventeen. Circularity? --
Chapter Eighteen. The Distinction between [P] and [S] --
Chapter Nineteen. Concernment and Repentance --
Chapter Twenty. Conclusion --
Postface --
Appendix One. "Of Identity and Diversity" An Essay concerning Human Understanding /
Appendix Two. A Defence of Mr. Locke's Opinion Concerning Personal Identity /
References --
Index
Summary:John Locke's theory of personal identity underlies all modern discussion of the nature of persons and selves-yet it is widely thought to be wrong. In this book, Galen Strawson argues that in fact it is Locke's critics who are wrong, and that the famous objections to his theory are invalid. Indeed, far from refuting Locke, they illustrate his fundamental point.Strawson argues that the root error is to take Locke's use of the word "person" as merely a term for a standard persisting thing, like "human being." In actuality, Locke uses "person" primarily as a forensic or legal term geared specifically to questions about praise and blame, punishment and reward. This point is familiar to some philosophers, but its full consequences have not been worked out, partly because of a further error about what Locke means by the word "conscious." When Locke claims that your personal identity is a matter of the actions that you are conscious of, he means the actions that you experience as your own in some fundamental and immediate manner.Clearly and vigorously argued, this is an important contribution both to the history of philosophy and to the contemporary philosophy of personal identity.
Format:Mode of access: Internet via World Wide Web.
ISBN:9781400851843
9783110444186
9783110665925
DOI:10.1515/9781400851843
Hierarchical level:Monograph
Statement of Responsibility: Galen Strawson.