Civil Passions : : Moral Sentiment and Democratic Deliberation / / Sharon R. Krause.
Must we put passions aside when we deliberate about justice? Can we do so? The dominant views of deliberation rightly emphasize the importance of impartiality as a cornerstone of fair decision making, but they wrongly assume that impartiality means being disengaged and passionless. In Civil Passions...
Saved in:
Superior document: | Title is part of eBook package: De Gruyter PUP eBook-Package 2000-2015 |
---|---|
VerfasserIn: | |
Place / Publishing House: | Princeton, NJ : : Princeton University Press, , [2008] ©2008 |
Year of Publication: | 2008 |
Edition: | Course Book |
Language: | English |
Online Access: | |
Physical Description: | 1 online resource |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Table of Contents:
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Acknowledgments
- INTRODUCTION. Citizenship, Judgment, and the Politics of Passion
- CHAPTER ONE. Justice and Passion in Rawls and Habermas
- CHAPTER TWO. Recent Alternatives to Rationalism
- CHAPTER THREE. Moral Sentiment and the Politics of Judgment in Hume
- CHAPTER FOUR. Affective Judgment in Democratic Politics
- CHAPTER FIVE. Public Deliberation and the Feeling of Impartiality
- CHAPTER SIX. The Affective Authority of Law
- CONCLUSION. Toward a New Politics of Passion: Civil Passions and the Promise of Justice
- Notes
- Bibliography
- Index