Civil Passions : : Moral Sentiment and Democratic Deliberation / / Sharon R. Krause.

Must we put passions aside when we deliberate about justice? Can we do so? The dominant views of deliberation rightly emphasize the importance of impartiality as a cornerstone of fair decision making, but they wrongly assume that impartiality means being disengaged and passionless. In Civil Passions...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Superior document:Title is part of eBook package: De Gruyter PUP eBook-Package 2000-2015
VerfasserIn:
Place / Publishing House:Princeton, NJ : : Princeton University Press, , [2008]
©2008
Year of Publication:2008
Edition:Course Book
Language:English
Online Access:
Physical Description:1 online resource
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Table of Contents:
  • Frontmatter
  • Contents
  • Acknowledgments
  • INTRODUCTION. Citizenship, Judgment, and the Politics of Passion
  • CHAPTER ONE. Justice and Passion in Rawls and Habermas
  • CHAPTER TWO. Recent Alternatives to Rationalism
  • CHAPTER THREE. Moral Sentiment and the Politics of Judgment in Hume
  • CHAPTER FOUR. Affective Judgment in Democratic Politics
  • CHAPTER FIVE. Public Deliberation and the Feeling of Impartiality
  • CHAPTER SIX. The Affective Authority of Law
  • CONCLUSION. Toward a New Politics of Passion: Civil Passions and the Promise of Justice
  • Notes
  • Bibliography
  • Index