Explaining the Cosmos : : The Ionian Tradition of Scientific Philosophy / / Daniel W. Graham.

• Superior document: Title is part of eBook package: De Gruyter Princeton University Press eBook-Package Backlist 2000-2013
• VerfasserIn: Graham, Daniel W.,
• Place / Publishing House: Princeton, NJ : : Princeton University Press, , [2009]; ©2006
• Year of Publication: 2009
• Edition: Course Book
• Language: English
• Physical Description: 1 online resource (368 p.)
• Other title: Frontmatter --; Contents --; Preface --; Abbreviations and Brief References --; 1. The Ionian Program --; 2. Anaximander’s Principles --; 3. Anaximenes’ Theory of Change --; 4. The Generating Substance Theory as an Explanatory Hypothesis --; 5. Heraclitus’s Criticism of Ionian Philosophy --; 6. Parmenides’ Criticism of Ionian Philosophy --; 7. Anaxagoras and Empedocles: Eleatic Pluralists --; 8. The Elemental Substance Theory as an Explanatory Hypothesis --; 9. The Atomist Reform --; 10. Diogenes of Apollonia and Material Monism --; 11. The Ionian Legacy --; References --; Index Locorum --; General Index
• Format: Mode of access: Internet via World Wide Web.
• ISBN: 9781400827459; 9783110442502
• DOI: 10.1515/9781400827459
• Access: restricted access
• Hierarchical level: Monograph
• Statement of Responsibility: Daniel W. Graham.

Explaining the Cosmos is a major reinterpretation of Greek scientific thought before Socrates. Focusing on the scientific tradition of philosophy, Daniel Graham argues that Presocratic philosophy is not a mere patchwork of different schools and styles of thought. Rather, there is a discernible and unified Ionian tradition that dominates Presocratic debates. Graham rejects the common interpretation of the early Ionians as "material monists" and also the view of the later Ionians as desperately trying to save scientific philosophy from Parmenides' criticisms. In Graham's view, Parmenides plays a constructive role in shaping the scientific debates of the fifth century BC. Accordingly, the history of Presocratic philosophy can be seen not as a series of dialectical failures, but rather as a series of theoretical advances that led to empirical discoveries. Indeed, the Ionian tradition can be seen as the origin of the scientific conception of the world that we still hold today.