That Eminent Tribunal : : Judicial Supremacy and the Constitution / / ed. by Christopher Wolfe.

The role of the United States Supreme Court has been deeply controversial throughout American history. Should the Court undertake the task of guarding a wide variety of controversial and often unenumerated rights? Or should it confine itself to enforcing specific constitutional provisions, leaving o...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Superior document:Title is part of eBook package: De Gruyter Princeton University Press eBook-Package Backlist 2000-2013
MitwirkendeR:
HerausgeberIn:
Place / Publishing House:Princeton, NJ : : Princeton University Press, , [2009]
©2005
Year of Publication:2009
Edition:Course Book
Language:English
Series:New Forum Books ; 52
Online Access:
Physical Description:1 online resource (256 p.)
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Table of Contents:
  • Frontmatter
  • Contents
  • Contributors
  • Introduction
  • Chapter 1. Is the Constitution Whatever the Winners Say It Is?
  • Chapter 2. Nationhood and Judicial Supremacy
  • Chapter 3. "Casey at the Bat"-Taking Another Swing at Planned Parenthood v. Casey
  • Chapter 4. Antijural Jurisprudence: The Vices of the Judges Enter a New Stage
  • Chapter 5. Judicial Power and the Withering of Civil Society
  • Chapter 6. The Academy, the Courts, and the Culture of Rationalism
  • Chapter 7. Judicial Moral Expertise and Real-World Constraints on Judicial Moral Reasoning
  • Chapter 8. Toward a More Balanced History of the Supreme Court
  • Chapter 9. Judicial Review and Republican Government
  • Chapter 10. The Casey Five versus the Federalism Five: Supreme Legislator or Prudent Umpire?
  • Chapter 11. The Rehnquist Court and "Conservative Judicial Activism"
  • Index