That Eminent Tribunal : : Judicial Supremacy and the Constitution / / ed. by Christopher Wolfe.
The role of the United States Supreme Court has been deeply controversial throughout American history. Should the Court undertake the task of guarding a wide variety of controversial and often unenumerated rights? Or should it confine itself to enforcing specific constitutional provisions, leaving o...
Saved in:
Superior document: | Title is part of eBook package: De Gruyter Princeton University Press eBook-Package Backlist 2000-2013 |
---|---|
MitwirkendeR: | |
HerausgeberIn: | |
Place / Publishing House: | Princeton, NJ : : Princeton University Press, , [2009] ©2005 |
Year of Publication: | 2009 |
Edition: | Course Book |
Language: | English |
Series: | New Forum Books ;
52 |
Online Access: | |
Physical Description: | 1 online resource (256 p.) |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Table of Contents:
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Contributors
- Introduction
- Chapter 1. Is the Constitution Whatever the Winners Say It Is?
- Chapter 2. Nationhood and Judicial Supremacy
- Chapter 3. "Casey at the Bat"-Taking Another Swing at Planned Parenthood v. Casey
- Chapter 4. Antijural Jurisprudence: The Vices of the Judges Enter a New Stage
- Chapter 5. Judicial Power and the Withering of Civil Society
- Chapter 6. The Academy, the Courts, and the Culture of Rationalism
- Chapter 7. Judicial Moral Expertise and Real-World Constraints on Judicial Moral Reasoning
- Chapter 8. Toward a More Balanced History of the Supreme Court
- Chapter 9. Judicial Review and Republican Government
- Chapter 10. The Casey Five versus the Federalism Five: Supreme Legislator or Prudent Umpire?
- Chapter 11. The Rehnquist Court and "Conservative Judicial Activism"
- Index