After Liberalism : : Mass Democracy in the Managerial State / / Paul Edward Gottfried.

• Superior document: Title is part of eBook package: De Gruyter Princeton University Press eBook-Package Archive 1927-1999
• VerfasserIn: Gottfried, Paul Edward,
• Place / Publishing House: Princeton, NJ : : Princeton University Press, , [2001]; ©1999
• Year of Publication: 2001
• Edition: Core Textbook
• Language: English
• Series: New Forum Books ; 25
• Physical Description: 1 online resource (200 p.)
• Other title: Frontmatter --; Contents --; Introduction --; CHAPTER ONE. In Search of a Liberal Essence --; CHAPTER TWO. Liberalismvs. Democracy --; CHAPTER THREE. Public Administration and Liberal Democracy --; CHAPTER FOUR. Pluralismand Liberal Democracy --; CHAPTER FIVE. Mass Democracy and the Populist Alternative --; Conclusion --; Notes --; Index
• Format: Mode of access: Internet via World Wide Web.
• ISBN: 9781400822898; 9783110442496
• DOI: 10.1515/9781400822898?locatt=mode:legacy
• Access: restricted access
• Hierarchical level: Monograph
• Statement of Responsibility: Paul Edward Gottfried.

In this trenchant challenge to social engineering, Paul Gottfried analyzes a patricide: the slaying of nineteenth-century liberalism by the managerial state. Many people, of course, realize that liberalism no longer connotes distributed powers and bourgeois moral standards, the need to protect civil society from an encroaching state, or the virtues of vigorous self-government. Many also know that today's "liberals" have far different goals from those of their predecessors, aiming as they do largely to combat prejudice, to provide social services and welfare benefits, and to defend expressive and "lifestyle" freedoms. Paul Gottfried does more than analyze these historical facts, however. He builds on them to show why it matters that the managerial state has replaced traditional liberalism: the new regimes of social engineers, he maintains, are elitists, and their rule is consensual only in the sense that it is unopposed by any widespread organized opposition. Throughout the western world, increasingly uprooted populations unthinkingly accept centralized controls in exchange for a variety of entitlements. In their frightening passivity, Gottfried locates the quandary for traditionalist and populist adversaries of the welfare state. How can opponents of administrative elites show the public that those who provide, however ineptly, for their material needs are the enemies of democratic self-rule and of independent decision making in family life? If we do not wake up, Gottfried warns, the political debate may soon be over, despite sporadic and ideologically confused populist rumblings in both Europe and the United States.