Political Questions Judicial Answers : : Does the Rule of Law Apply to Foreign Affairs? / / Thomas M. Franck.
Almost since the beginning of the republic, America's rigorous separation of powers among Executive, Legislative, and Judicial Branches has been umpired by the federal judiciary. It may seem surprising, then, that many otherwise ordinary cases are not decided in court even when they include all...
Saved in:
Superior document: | Title is part of eBook package: De Gruyter Princeton University Press eBook-Package Archive 1927-1999 |
---|---|
VerfasserIn: | |
Place / Publishing House: | Princeton, NJ : : Princeton University Press, , [2012] ©1993 |
Year of Publication: | 2012 |
Edition: | Course Book |
Language: | English |
Online Access: | |
Physical Description: | 1 online resource (212 p.) |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
id |
9781400820733 |
---|---|
ctrlnum |
(DE-B1597)447246 (OCoLC)979685144 |
collection |
bib_alma |
record_format |
marc |
spelling |
Franck, Thomas M., author. aut http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut Political Questions Judicial Answers : Does the Rule of Law Apply to Foreign Affairs? / Thomas M. Franck. Course Book Princeton, NJ : Princeton University Press, [2012] ©1993 1 online resource (212 p.) text txt rdacontent computer c rdamedia online resource cr rdacarrier text file PDF rda Frontmatter -- Contents -- Acknowledgments -- CHAPTER ONE. Introduction -- CHAPTER TWO. How Abdication Crept into the Judicial Repertory -- CHAPTER THREE. Two Principled Theories of Constitutionalism -- CHAPTER FOUR. Prudential Reasons for Judicial Abdication -- CHAPTER FIVE. When Judges Refuse to Abdicate -- CHAPTER SIX. Mandated Adjudication: Act of State and Sovereign Immunity -- CHAPTER SEVEN. Abolishing Judicial Abdication: The German Model -- CHAPTER EIGHT. A Rule of Evidence in Place of the Political-Question Doctrine -- CHAPTER NINE. The Special Cases: In Camera Proceedings and Declaratory Judgments -- CHAPTER TEN. Conclusions: Does the Rule of Law Stop at the Water's Edge? -- Notes -- Index restricted access http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_16ec online access with authorization star Almost since the beginning of the republic, America's rigorous separation of powers among Executive, Legislative, and Judicial Branches has been umpired by the federal judiciary. It may seem surprising, then, that many otherwise ordinary cases are not decided in court even when they include allegations that the President, or Congress, has violated a law or the Constitution itself. Most of these orphan cases are shunned by the judiciary simply because they have foreign policy aspects. In refusing to address the issues involved, judges indicate that judicial review, like politics, should stop at the water's edge--and foreign policy managers find it convenient to agree! Thomas Franck, however, maintains that when courts invoke the "political question" doctrine to justify such reticence, they evade a constitutional duty. In his view, whether the government has acted constitutionally in sending men and women to die in foreign battles is just as appropriate an issue for a court to decide as whether property has been taken without due process. In this revisionist work, Franck proposes ways to subject the conduct of foreign policy to the rule of law without compromising either judicial integrity or the national interest. By examining the historical origins of the separation of powers in the American constitutional tradition, with comparative reference to the practices of judiciaries in other federal systems, he broadens and enriches discussions of an important national issue that has particular significance for critical debate about the "imperial presidency." Issued also in print. Mode of access: Internet via World Wide Web. In English. Description based on online resource; title from PDF title page (publisher's Web site, viewed 30. Aug 2021) Courts United States. Judicial review United States. National security Law and legislation United States. Political questions and judicial power United States. Separation of powers United States. LAW / Legal History. bisacsh Title is part of eBook package: De Gruyter Princeton University Press eBook-Package Archive 1927-1999 9783110442496 print 9780691092416 https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400820733 https://www.degruyter.com/isbn/9781400820733 Cover https://www.degruyter.com/cover/covers/9781400820733.jpg |
language |
English |
format |
eBook |
author |
Franck, Thomas M., Franck, Thomas M., |
spellingShingle |
Franck, Thomas M., Franck, Thomas M., Political Questions Judicial Answers : Does the Rule of Law Apply to Foreign Affairs? / Frontmatter -- Contents -- Acknowledgments -- CHAPTER ONE. Introduction -- CHAPTER TWO. How Abdication Crept into the Judicial Repertory -- CHAPTER THREE. Two Principled Theories of Constitutionalism -- CHAPTER FOUR. Prudential Reasons for Judicial Abdication -- CHAPTER FIVE. When Judges Refuse to Abdicate -- CHAPTER SIX. Mandated Adjudication: Act of State and Sovereign Immunity -- CHAPTER SEVEN. Abolishing Judicial Abdication: The German Model -- CHAPTER EIGHT. A Rule of Evidence in Place of the Political-Question Doctrine -- CHAPTER NINE. The Special Cases: In Camera Proceedings and Declaratory Judgments -- CHAPTER TEN. Conclusions: Does the Rule of Law Stop at the Water's Edge? -- Notes -- Index |
author_facet |
Franck, Thomas M., Franck, Thomas M., |
author_variant |
t m f tm tmf t m f tm tmf |
author_role |
VerfasserIn VerfasserIn |
author_sort |
Franck, Thomas M., |
title |
Political Questions Judicial Answers : Does the Rule of Law Apply to Foreign Affairs? / |
title_sub |
Does the Rule of Law Apply to Foreign Affairs? / |
title_full |
Political Questions Judicial Answers : Does the Rule of Law Apply to Foreign Affairs? / Thomas M. Franck. |
title_fullStr |
Political Questions Judicial Answers : Does the Rule of Law Apply to Foreign Affairs? / Thomas M. Franck. |
title_full_unstemmed |
Political Questions Judicial Answers : Does the Rule of Law Apply to Foreign Affairs? / Thomas M. Franck. |
title_auth |
Political Questions Judicial Answers : Does the Rule of Law Apply to Foreign Affairs? / |
title_alt |
Frontmatter -- Contents -- Acknowledgments -- CHAPTER ONE. Introduction -- CHAPTER TWO. How Abdication Crept into the Judicial Repertory -- CHAPTER THREE. Two Principled Theories of Constitutionalism -- CHAPTER FOUR. Prudential Reasons for Judicial Abdication -- CHAPTER FIVE. When Judges Refuse to Abdicate -- CHAPTER SIX. Mandated Adjudication: Act of State and Sovereign Immunity -- CHAPTER SEVEN. Abolishing Judicial Abdication: The German Model -- CHAPTER EIGHT. A Rule of Evidence in Place of the Political-Question Doctrine -- CHAPTER NINE. The Special Cases: In Camera Proceedings and Declaratory Judgments -- CHAPTER TEN. Conclusions: Does the Rule of Law Stop at the Water's Edge? -- Notes -- Index |
title_new |
Political Questions Judicial Answers : |
title_sort |
political questions judicial answers : does the rule of law apply to foreign affairs? / |
publisher |
Princeton University Press, |
publishDate |
2012 |
physical |
1 online resource (212 p.) Issued also in print. |
edition |
Course Book |
contents |
Frontmatter -- Contents -- Acknowledgments -- CHAPTER ONE. Introduction -- CHAPTER TWO. How Abdication Crept into the Judicial Repertory -- CHAPTER THREE. Two Principled Theories of Constitutionalism -- CHAPTER FOUR. Prudential Reasons for Judicial Abdication -- CHAPTER FIVE. When Judges Refuse to Abdicate -- CHAPTER SIX. Mandated Adjudication: Act of State and Sovereign Immunity -- CHAPTER SEVEN. Abolishing Judicial Abdication: The German Model -- CHAPTER EIGHT. A Rule of Evidence in Place of the Political-Question Doctrine -- CHAPTER NINE. The Special Cases: In Camera Proceedings and Declaratory Judgments -- CHAPTER TEN. Conclusions: Does the Rule of Law Stop at the Water's Edge? -- Notes -- Index |
isbn |
9781400820733 9783110442496 9780691092416 |
callnumber-first |
K - Law |
callnumber-subject |
KF - United States |
callnumber-label |
KF4651 |
callnumber-sort |
KF 44651 F73 |
geographic_facet |
United States. |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400820733 https://www.degruyter.com/isbn/9781400820733 https://www.degruyter.com/cover/covers/9781400820733.jpg |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
dewey-hundreds |
300 - Social sciences |
dewey-tens |
340 - Law |
dewey-ones |
342 - Constitutional & administrative law 347 - Civil procedure & courts |
dewey-full |
342.73/044 342.73044 347.30244 |
dewey-sort |
3342.73 244 |
dewey-raw |
342.73/044 342.73044 347.30244 |
dewey-search |
342.73/044 342.73044 347.30244 |
doi_str_mv |
10.1515/9781400820733 |
oclc_num |
979685144 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT franckthomasm politicalquestionsjudicialanswersdoestheruleoflawapplytoforeignaffairs |
status_str |
n |
ids_txt_mv |
(DE-B1597)447246 (OCoLC)979685144 |
carrierType_str_mv |
cr |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Title is part of eBook package: De Gruyter Princeton University Press eBook-Package Archive 1927-1999 |
is_hierarchy_title |
Political Questions Judicial Answers : Does the Rule of Law Apply to Foreign Affairs? / |
container_title |
Title is part of eBook package: De Gruyter Princeton University Press eBook-Package Archive 1927-1999 |
_version_ |
1770176621005766656 |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>05110nam a22007815i 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">9781400820733</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-B1597</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20210830012106.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="006">m|||||o||d||||||||</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr || ||||||||</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">210830t20121993nju fo d z eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9781400820733</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1515/9781400820733</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-B1597)447246</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)979685144</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-B1597</subfield><subfield code="b">eng</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-B1597</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="044" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nju</subfield><subfield code="c">US-NJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">KF4651 .F73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="072" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">LAW060000</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">342.73/044</subfield><subfield code="a">342.73044</subfield><subfield code="a">347.30244</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Franck, Thomas M., </subfield><subfield code="e">author.</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield><subfield code="4">http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Political Questions Judicial Answers :</subfield><subfield code="b">Does the Rule of Law Apply to Foreign Affairs? /</subfield><subfield code="c">Thomas M. Franck.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="250" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Course Book</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Princeton, NJ : </subfield><subfield code="b">Princeton University Press, </subfield><subfield code="c">[2012]</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="c">©1993</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 online resource (212 p.)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">computer</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">online resource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="347" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">text file</subfield><subfield code="b">PDF</subfield><subfield code="2">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="t">Frontmatter -- </subfield><subfield code="t">Contents -- </subfield><subfield code="t">Acknowledgments -- </subfield><subfield code="t">CHAPTER ONE. Introduction -- </subfield><subfield code="t">CHAPTER TWO. How Abdication Crept into the Judicial Repertory -- </subfield><subfield code="t">CHAPTER THREE. Two Principled Theories of Constitutionalism -- </subfield><subfield code="t">CHAPTER FOUR. Prudential Reasons for Judicial Abdication -- </subfield><subfield code="t">CHAPTER FIVE. When Judges Refuse to Abdicate -- </subfield><subfield code="t">CHAPTER SIX. Mandated Adjudication: Act of State and Sovereign Immunity -- </subfield><subfield code="t">CHAPTER SEVEN. Abolishing Judicial Abdication: The German Model -- </subfield><subfield code="t">CHAPTER EIGHT. A Rule of Evidence in Place of the Political-Question Doctrine -- </subfield><subfield code="t">CHAPTER NINE. The Special Cases: In Camera Proceedings and Declaratory Judgments -- </subfield><subfield code="t">CHAPTER TEN. Conclusions: Does the Rule of Law Stop at the Water's Edge? -- </subfield><subfield code="t">Notes -- </subfield><subfield code="t">Index</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="506" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">restricted access</subfield><subfield code="u">http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_16ec</subfield><subfield code="f">online access with authorization</subfield><subfield code="2">star</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Almost since the beginning of the republic, America's rigorous separation of powers among Executive, Legislative, and Judicial Branches has been umpired by the federal judiciary. It may seem surprising, then, that many otherwise ordinary cases are not decided in court even when they include allegations that the President, or Congress, has violated a law or the Constitution itself. Most of these orphan cases are shunned by the judiciary simply because they have foreign policy aspects. In refusing to address the issues involved, judges indicate that judicial review, like politics, should stop at the water's edge--and foreign policy managers find it convenient to agree! Thomas Franck, however, maintains that when courts invoke the "political question" doctrine to justify such reticence, they evade a constitutional duty. In his view, whether the government has acted constitutionally in sending men and women to die in foreign battles is just as appropriate an issue for a court to decide as whether property has been taken without due process. In this revisionist work, Franck proposes ways to subject the conduct of foreign policy to the rule of law without compromising either judicial integrity or the national interest. By examining the historical origins of the separation of powers in the American constitutional tradition, with comparative reference to the practices of judiciaries in other federal systems, he broadens and enriches discussions of an important national issue that has particular significance for critical debate about the "imperial presidency."</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="530" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Issued also in print.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="538" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Mode of access: Internet via World Wide Web.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="546" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">In English.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="588" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Description based on online resource; title from PDF title page (publisher's Web site, viewed 30. Aug 2021)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Courts</subfield><subfield code="z">United States.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Judicial review</subfield><subfield code="z">United States.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">National security</subfield><subfield code="x">Law and legislation</subfield><subfield code="z">United States.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Political questions and judicial power</subfield><subfield code="z">United States.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Separation of powers</subfield><subfield code="z">United States.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">LAW / Legal History.</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Title is part of eBook package:</subfield><subfield code="d">De Gruyter</subfield><subfield code="t">Princeton University Press eBook-Package Archive 1927-1999</subfield><subfield code="z">9783110442496</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="c">print</subfield><subfield code="z">9780691092416</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400820733</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://www.degruyter.com/isbn/9781400820733</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="3">Cover</subfield><subfield code="u">https://www.degruyter.com/cover/covers/9781400820733.jpg</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">978-3-11-044249-6 Princeton University Press eBook-Package Archive 1927-1999</subfield><subfield code="c">1927</subfield><subfield code="d">1999</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">EBA_BACKALL</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">EBA_CL_LAEC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">EBA_EBACKALL</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">EBA_EBKALL</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">EBA_ECL_LAEC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">EBA_EEBKALL</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">EBA_ESSHALL</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">EBA_ESTMALL</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">EBA_PPALL</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">EBA_SSHALL</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">EBA_STMALL</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV-deGruyter-alles</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">PDA11SSHE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">PDA12STME</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">PDA13ENGE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">PDA17SSHEE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">PDA18STMEE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">PDA5EBK</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |