Isaac On Jewish and Christian Altars : : Polemic and Exegesis in Rashi and the Glossa Ordinaria / / Devorah Schoenfeld.

• Superior document: Title is part of eBook package: De Gruyter Fordham University Press Complete eBook-Package Pre-2014
• VerfasserIn: Schoenfeld, Devorah,
• Place / Publishing House: New York, NY : : Fordham University Press, , [2022]; ©2013
• Year of Publication: 2022
• Language: English
• Series: Fordham Series in Medieval Studies
• Physical Description: 1 online resource (240 p.)
• Other title: Frontmatter --; Contents --; Acknowledgments --; Notes on Format --; Introduction --; 1. The Developing Jewish–Christian Polemic --; 2. Rashi and His Sources --; 3. The Sources and Manuscript Evolution of the Glossa Ordinaria on Genesis 22 --; 4. Isaac on Jewish and Christian Altars: Polemic, Faith, and Sacrifice in Rashi and the Gloss on Genesis 22 --; Appendixes --; A. A Critical Edition of the Glossa Ordinaria on Genesis 22: Overview of Existing Editions of the Gloss and Rationale for Present Edition --; B. Major Manuscript Variants in Rashi’s Commentary on Genesis 22: Existing Editions and Rationale for Present Edition --; Notes --; Bibliography --; Index
• Format: Mode of access: Internet via World Wide Web.
• ISBN: 9780823291892; 9783111189604; 9783110707298
• DOI: 10.1515/9780823291892
• Access: restricted access
• Hierarchical level: Monograph
• Statement of Responsibility: Devorah Schoenfeld.

Devorah Schoenfeld’s new work offers an in-depth examination of two of the most influential Christian and Jewish Bible commentaries of the High Middle Ages. The Glossa Ordinaria and Rashi’s commentary were standard texts for Bible study in the High Middle Ages, and Rashi's influence continues to the present day. Although Rashi’s commentary and the Glossa developed at the same time with no known contact between them, they shared a way of reading text that shaped their interpretations of the central religious narrative of the Binding of Isaac. Schoenfeld’s text examines each commentary unto itself and offers a detailed comparison, one that illustrates the similarities between Rashi and the Gloss that derive not merely from their shared late antique heritage but also from their common twelfth-century context, and the Jewish-Christian polemic in which they both, implicitly or explicitly, take part.