Corporate Romanticism : : Liberalism, Justice, and the Novel / / Daniel M. Stout.

• Superior document: Title is part of eBook package: De Gruyter Fordham University Press Complete eBook-Package 2016
• VerfasserIn: Stout, Daniel M.,
• Place / Publishing House: New York, NY : : Fordham University Press, , [2016]; ©2016
• Year of Publication: 2016
• Language: English
• Series: Lit Z
• Physical Description: 1 online resource (264 p.)
• Other title: Frontmatter --; Contents --; Introduction: Personification and Its Discontents --; 1. The Pursuit of Guilty Things --; 2. The One and the Manor --; 3. Castes of Exception --; 4. Nothing Personal --; 5. Not World Enough --; Epilogue: Everything Counts (Frankenstein) --; Acknowledgments --; Notes --; Works Cited --; Index
• Format: Mode of access: Internet via World Wide Web.
• ISBN: 9780823272266; 9783110729023
• DOI: 10.1515/9780823272266
• Access: restricted access
• Hierarchical level: Monograph
• Statement of Responsibility: Daniel M. Stout.

Corporate Romanticism offers an alternative history of the connections between modernity, individualism, and the novel. In early nineteenth-century England, two developments-the rise of corporate persons and the expanded scale of industrial action-undermined the basic assumption underpinning both liberalism and the law: that individual human persons can be meaningfully correlated with specific actions and particular effects. Reading works by Godwin, Austen, Hogg, Mary Shelley, and Dickens alongside a wide-ranging set of debates in nineteenth-century law and Romantic politics and aesthetics, Daniel Stout argues that the novel, a literary form long understood as a reflection of individualism's ideological ascent, in fact registered the fragile fictionality of accountable individuals in a period defined by corporate actors and expansively entangled fields of action.Examining how liberalism, the law, and the novel all wrestled with the moral implications of a highly collectivized and densely packed modernity, Corporate Romanticism reconfigures our sense of the nineteenth century and its novels, arguing that we see in them not simply the apotheosis of laissez-fair individualism but the first chapter of a crucial and distinctly modern problem about how to fit the individualist and humanist terms of justice onto a world in which the most consequential agents are no longer persons.