Matters of Principle : : Legitimate Legal Argument and Constitutional Interpretation / / Richard S. Markovits.
The United States is generally believed to be a liberal, rights-based culture. In such a society, according to Richard S. Markovits, arguments of moral principle dominate legal discourse. Markovits analyzes various rights related to our society's basic duties of showing appropriate, equal respe...
Saved in:
| Superior document: | Title is part of eBook package: De Gruyter New York University Press Archive eBook-Package Pre-2000 |
|---|---|
| VerfasserIn: | |
| Place / Publishing House: | New York, NY : : New York University Press, , [1998] ©1998 |
| Year of Publication: | 1998 |
| Language: | English |
| Online Access: | |
| Physical Description: | 1 online resource |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Table of Contents:
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction
- 1 Legitimate Legal Argument and Constitutional Interpretation: My Position
- 2 Alternatives
- 3 The Duty of Appropriate, Equal Respect: Some Constitutional-Law Implications
- 4 The Duty of Appropriate, Equal Concern: Some Constitutional-Law Implications
- Conclusion
- Notes
- Author Index
- Case Index
- Subject Index
- About the Author