The Law as it Could Be / / Owen Fiss.

• Superior document: Title is part of eBook package: De Gruyter New York University Press Backlist eBook-Package 2000-2013
• VerfasserIn: Fiss, Owen,
• Place / Publishing House: New York, NY : : New York University Press, , [2003]; ©2003
• Year of Publication: 2003
• Language: English
• Physical Description: 1 online resource
• Other title: Frontmatter --; Contents --; Preface --; 1 The Forms of Justice --; 2 The Social and Political Foundations of Adjudication --; 3 The Right Degree of Independence --; 4 The Bureaucratization of the Judiciary --; 5 Against Settlement --; 6 The Allure of Individualism --; 7 The Political Theory of the Class Action --; 8 The Awkwardness of the Criminal Law --; 9 Objectivity and Interpretation --; 10 Judging as a Practice --; 11 The Death of Law --; 12 Reason vs. Passion --; 13 The Irrepressibility of Reason --; 14 Bush v. Gore and the Question of Legitimacy --; Afterword --; Notes --; Index --; Acknowledgments --; About the Author
• Format: Mode of access: Internet via World Wide Web.
• ISBN: 9780814728611; 9783110706444
• Access: restricted access
• Hierarchical level: Monograph
• Statement of Responsibility: Owen Fiss.

The Law As It Could Be gathers Fiss’s most important work on procedure, adjudication and public reason, introduced by the author and including contextual introductions for each piece-some of which are among the most cited in Twentieth Century legal studies. Fiss surveys the legal terrain between the landmark cases of Brown v. Board of Education and Bush v. Gore to reclaim the legal legacy of the Civil Rights Movement. He argues forcefully for a vision of judges as instruments of public reason and of the courts as a means of shaping society in the image of the Constitution. In building his argument, Fiss attends to topics as diverse as the use of the injunction to restructure social institutions; how law and economics have misunderstood the role of the judge; why the movement seeking alternatives to adjudication fails to serve the public interest; and why Bush v. Gore was not the constitutional crisis some would have us believe. In so doing, Fiss reveals a vision of adjudication that vindicates the public reason on which Brown v. Board of Education was founded.