The Purpose of Intervention : : Changing Beliefs about the Use of Force / / Martha Finnemore.

• Superior document: Title is part of eBook package: De Gruyter Cornell University Press Backlist 2000-2013
• VerfasserIn: Finnemore, Martha,
• Place / Publishing House: Ithaca, NY : : Cornell University Press, , [2013]; ©2013
• Year of Publication: 2013
• Language: English
• Series: Cornell Studies in Security Affairs
• Physical Description: 1 online resource (184 p.) :; 14 tables
• Other title: Frontmatter --; Contents --; Acknowledgments --; 1. The Purpose of Force --; 2. Sovereign Default and Military Intervention --; 3. Changing Norms of Humanitarian Intervention --; 4. Intervention and International Order --; 5. How Purpose Changes --; Appendix: Measuring Material Distribution of Power --; Index
• Format: Mode of access: Internet via World Wide Web.
• ISBN: 9780801467073; 9783110536157
• DOI: 10.7591/9780801467073
• Access: restricted access
• Hierarchical level: Monograph
• Statement of Responsibility: Martha Finnemore.

Violence or the potential for violence is a fact of human existence. Many societies, including our own, reward martial success or skill at arms. The ways in which members of a particular society use force reveal a great deal about the nature of authority within the group and about its members' priorities.In The Purpose of Intervention, Martha Finnemore uses one type of force, military intervention, as a window onto the shifting character of international society. She examines the changes, over the past 400 years, about why countries intervene militarily, as well as in the ways they have intervened. It is not the fact of intervention that has altered, she says, but rather the reasons for and meaning behind intervention—the conventional understanding of the purposes for which states can and should use force.Finnemore looks at three types of intervention: collecting debts, addressing humanitarian crises, and acting against states perceived as threats to international peace. In all three, she finds that what is now considered "obvious" was vigorously contested or even rejected by people in earlier periods for well-articulated and logical reasons. A broad historical perspective allows her to explicate long-term trends: the steady erosion of force's normative value in international politics, the growing influence of equality norms in many aspects of global political life, and the increasing importance of law in intervention practices.