The President Who Would Not Be King : : Executive Power under the Constitution / / Michael W. McConnell.

Vital perspectives for the divided Trump era on what the Constitution's framers intended when they defined the extent—and limits—of presidential powerOne of the most vexing questions for the framers of the Constitution was how to create a vigorous and independent executive without making him ki...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Superior document:Title is part of eBook package: De Gruyter EBOOK PACKAGE COMPLETE 2020 English
VerfasserIn:
MitwirkendeR:
Place / Publishing House:Princeton, NJ : : Princeton University Press, , [2020]
©2020
Year of Publication:2020
Language:English
Series:The University Center for Human Values Series ; 48
Online Access:
Physical Description:1 online resource (440 p.) :; 3 b/w illus.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Other title:Frontmatter --
Contents --
Foreword --
Acknowledgments --
Introduction: Purpose, Scope, Method --
Part I. The work of the convention --
1 Creating a Republican Executive --
2 Debate Begins on the Presidency --
3 Election and Removal --
4 The Audacious Innovations of the Committee of Detail --
5 Completing the Executive --
6 Ratification Debates --
Part II. Allocating royal powers --
7 The Framers’ General Theory of Allocating Powers --
8 The Core Legislative Powers of Taxing and Lawmaking --
9 The President’s Legislative Powers --
10 The Power to Control Law Execution --
11 Foreign Affairs and War --
12 Other Prerogative Powers --
Part III. the logical structure of article II --
13 The Executive Power Vesting Clause --
14 The Logic of the Organization of Article II --
15 The Three Varieties of Presidential Power --
Part IV. illustrative examples --
16 Two Classic Cases --
17 Three Presidents, Three Conflicts --
18 The Administrative State --
Conclusion --
Short-Form Citations --
Notes --
Index
Summary:Vital perspectives for the divided Trump era on what the Constitution's framers intended when they defined the extent—and limits—of presidential powerOne of the most vexing questions for the framers of the Constitution was how to create a vigorous and independent executive without making him king. In today's divided public square, presidential power has never been more contested. The President Who Would Not Be King cuts through the partisan rancor to reveal what the Constitution really tells us about the powers of the president.Michael McConnell provides a comprehensive account of the drafting of presidential powers. Because the framers met behind closed doors and left no records of their deliberations, close attention must be given to their successive drafts. McConnell shows how the framers worked from a mental list of the powers of the British monarch, and consciously decided which powers to strip from the presidency to avoid tyranny. He examines each of these powers in turn, explaining how they were understood at the time of the founding, and goes on to provide a framework for evaluating separation of powers claims, distinguishing between powers that are subject to congressional control and those in which the president has full discretion.Based on the Tanner Lectures at Princeton University, The President Who Would Not Be King restores the original vision of the framers, showing how the Constitution restrains the excesses of an imperial presidency while empowering the executive to govern effectively.
Format:Mode of access: Internet via World Wide Web.
ISBN:9780691211992
9783110704716
9783110704518
9783110704594
9783110704723
9783110690088
DOI:10.1515/9780691211992?locatt=mode:legacy
Access:restricted access
Hierarchical level:Monograph
Statement of Responsibility: Michael W. McConnell.