Courting Death : : The Supreme Court and Capital Punishment / / Carol S. Steiker.

Unique among Western democracies in refusing to eradicate the death penalty, the United States has attempted instead to reform and rationalize state death penalty practices through federal constitutional law. Courting Death traces the unusual and distinctive history of top-down judicial regulation o...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Superior document:Title is part of eBook package: De Gruyter Harvard University Press Complete eBook-Package 2016
VerfasserIn:
Place / Publishing House:Cambridge, MA : : Harvard University Press, , [2017]
©2016
Year of Publication:2017
Language:English
Online Access:
Physical Description:1 online resource (320 p.) :; 1 line illustration
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id 9780674974852
ctrlnum (DE-B1597)479745
(OCoLC)984665874
collection bib_alma
record_format marc
spelling Steiker, Carol S., author. aut http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut
Courting Death : The Supreme Court and Capital Punishment / Carol S. Steiker.
Cambridge, MA : Harvard University Press, [2017]
©2016
1 online resource (320 p.) : 1 line illustration
text txt rdacontent
computer c rdamedia
online resource cr rdacarrier
text file PDF rda
Frontmatter -- Contents -- Introduction -- 1. Before Constitutional Regulation -- 2. The Supreme Court Steps In -- 3. The Invisibility of Race in the Constitutional Revolution -- 4. Between the Supreme Court and the States -- 5. The Failures of Regulation -- 6. An Unsustainable System? -- 7. Recurring Patterns in Constitutional Regulation -- 8. The Future of the American Death Penalty -- 9. Life after Death -- Notes -- Acknowledgments -- Index
restricted access http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_16ec online access with authorization star
Unique among Western democracies in refusing to eradicate the death penalty, the United States has attempted instead to reform and rationalize state death penalty practices through federal constitutional law. Courting Death traces the unusual and distinctive history of top-down judicial regulation of capital punishment under the Constitution and its unanticipated consequences for our time. In the 1960s and 1970s, in the face of widespread abolition of the death penalty around the world, provisions for capital punishment that had long fallen under the purview of the states were challenged in federal courts. The U.S. Supreme Court intervened in two landmark decisions, first by constitutionally invalidating the death penalty in Furman v. Georgia (1972) on the grounds that it was capricious and discriminatory, followed four years later by restoring it in Gregg v. Georgia (1976). Since then, by neither retaining capital punishment in unfettered form nor abolishing it outright, the Supreme Court has created a complex regulatory apparatus that has brought executions in many states to a halt, while also failing to address the problems that led the Court to intervene in the first place. While execution chambers remain active in several states, constitutional regulation has contributed to the death penalty’s new fragility. In the next decade or two, Carol Steiker and Jordan Steiker argue, the fate of the American death penalty is likely to be sealed by this failed judicial experiment. Courting Death illuminates both the promise and pitfalls of constitutional regulation of contentious social issues.
Mode of access: Internet via World Wide Web.
In English.
Description based on online resource; title from PDF title page (publisher's Web site, viewed 24. Aug 2021)
Capital punishment United States History.
Capital punishment United States.
Discrimination in capital punishment United States.
Judicial review United States.
LAW / Constitutional. bisacsh
Title is part of eBook package: De Gruyter Harvard University Press Complete eBook-Package 2016 9783110638585
https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674974852
https://www.degruyter.com/isbn/9780674974852
Cover https://www.degruyter.com/cover/covers/9780674974852.jpg
language English
format eBook
author Steiker, Carol S.,
Steiker, Carol S.,
spellingShingle Steiker, Carol S.,
Steiker, Carol S.,
Courting Death : The Supreme Court and Capital Punishment /
Frontmatter --
Contents --
Introduction --
1. Before Constitutional Regulation --
2. The Supreme Court Steps In --
3. The Invisibility of Race in the Constitutional Revolution --
4. Between the Supreme Court and the States --
5. The Failures of Regulation --
6. An Unsustainable System? --
7. Recurring Patterns in Constitutional Regulation --
8. The Future of the American Death Penalty --
9. Life after Death --
Notes --
Acknowledgments --
Index
author_facet Steiker, Carol S.,
Steiker, Carol S.,
author_variant c s s cs css
c s s cs css
author_role VerfasserIn
VerfasserIn
author_sort Steiker, Carol S.,
title Courting Death : The Supreme Court and Capital Punishment /
title_sub The Supreme Court and Capital Punishment /
title_full Courting Death : The Supreme Court and Capital Punishment / Carol S. Steiker.
title_fullStr Courting Death : The Supreme Court and Capital Punishment / Carol S. Steiker.
title_full_unstemmed Courting Death : The Supreme Court and Capital Punishment / Carol S. Steiker.
title_auth Courting Death : The Supreme Court and Capital Punishment /
title_alt Frontmatter --
Contents --
Introduction --
1. Before Constitutional Regulation --
2. The Supreme Court Steps In --
3. The Invisibility of Race in the Constitutional Revolution --
4. Between the Supreme Court and the States --
5. The Failures of Regulation --
6. An Unsustainable System? --
7. Recurring Patterns in Constitutional Regulation --
8. The Future of the American Death Penalty --
9. Life after Death --
Notes --
Acknowledgments --
Index
title_new Courting Death :
title_sort courting death : the supreme court and capital punishment /
publisher Harvard University Press,
publishDate 2017
physical 1 online resource (320 p.) : 1 line illustration
contents Frontmatter --
Contents --
Introduction --
1. Before Constitutional Regulation --
2. The Supreme Court Steps In --
3. The Invisibility of Race in the Constitutional Revolution --
4. Between the Supreme Court and the States --
5. The Failures of Regulation --
6. An Unsustainable System? --
7. Recurring Patterns in Constitutional Regulation --
8. The Future of the American Death Penalty --
9. Life after Death --
Notes --
Acknowledgments --
Index
isbn 9780674974852
9783110638585
callnumber-first K - Law
callnumber-subject KF - United States
callnumber-label KF9227
callnumber-sort KF 49227 C2 S74 42016EB
geographic_facet United States
United States.
url https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674974852
https://www.degruyter.com/isbn/9780674974852
https://www.degruyter.com/cover/covers/9780674974852.jpg
illustrated Not Illustrated
dewey-hundreds 300 - Social sciences
dewey-tens 340 - Law
dewey-ones 345 - Criminal law
dewey-full 345.73/0773
dewey-sort 3345.73 3773
dewey-raw 345.73/0773
dewey-search 345.73/0773
doi_str_mv 10.4159/9780674974852
oclc_num 984665874
work_keys_str_mv AT steikercarols courtingdeaththesupremecourtandcapitalpunishment
status_str n
ids_txt_mv (DE-B1597)479745
(OCoLC)984665874
carrierType_str_mv cr
hierarchy_parent_title Title is part of eBook package: De Gruyter Harvard University Press Complete eBook-Package 2016
is_hierarchy_title Courting Death : The Supreme Court and Capital Punishment /
container_title Title is part of eBook package: De Gruyter Harvard University Press Complete eBook-Package 2016
_version_ 1806143255723638784
fullrecord <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>04240nam a22005295i 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">9780674974852</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-B1597</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20210824034702.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="006">m|||||o||d||||||||</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr || ||||||||</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">210824t20172016mau fo d z eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9780674974852</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.4159/9780674974852</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-B1597)479745</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)984665874</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-B1597</subfield><subfield code="b">eng</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-B1597</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="044" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">mau</subfield><subfield code="c">US-MA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">KF9227.C2</subfield><subfield code="b">S74 2016eb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="072" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">LAW018000</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">345.73/0773</subfield><subfield code="2">23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Steiker, Carol S., </subfield><subfield code="e">author.</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield><subfield code="4">http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Courting Death :</subfield><subfield code="b">The Supreme Court and Capital Punishment /</subfield><subfield code="c">Carol S. Steiker.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Cambridge, MA : </subfield><subfield code="b">Harvard University Press, </subfield><subfield code="c">[2017]</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="c">©2016</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 online resource (320 p.) :</subfield><subfield code="b">1 line illustration</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">computer</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">online resource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="347" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">text file</subfield><subfield code="b">PDF</subfield><subfield code="2">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="t">Frontmatter -- </subfield><subfield code="t">Contents -- </subfield><subfield code="t">Introduction -- </subfield><subfield code="t">1. Before Constitutional Regulation -- </subfield><subfield code="t">2. The Supreme Court Steps In -- </subfield><subfield code="t">3. The Invisibility of Race in the Constitutional Revolution -- </subfield><subfield code="t">4. Between the Supreme Court and the States -- </subfield><subfield code="t">5. The Failures of Regulation -- </subfield><subfield code="t">6. An Unsustainable System? -- </subfield><subfield code="t">7. Recurring Patterns in Constitutional Regulation -- </subfield><subfield code="t">8. The Future of the American Death Penalty -- </subfield><subfield code="t">9. Life after Death -- </subfield><subfield code="t">Notes -- </subfield><subfield code="t">Acknowledgments -- </subfield><subfield code="t">Index</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="506" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">restricted access</subfield><subfield code="u">http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_16ec</subfield><subfield code="f">online access with authorization</subfield><subfield code="2">star</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Unique among Western democracies in refusing to eradicate the death penalty, the United States has attempted instead to reform and rationalize state death penalty practices through federal constitutional law. Courting Death traces the unusual and distinctive history of top-down judicial regulation of capital punishment under the Constitution and its unanticipated consequences for our time. In the 1960s and 1970s, in the face of widespread abolition of the death penalty around the world, provisions for capital punishment that had long fallen under the purview of the states were challenged in federal courts. The U.S. Supreme Court intervened in two landmark decisions, first by constitutionally invalidating the death penalty in Furman v. Georgia (1972) on the grounds that it was capricious and discriminatory, followed four years later by restoring it in Gregg v. Georgia (1976). Since then, by neither retaining capital punishment in unfettered form nor abolishing it outright, the Supreme Court has created a complex regulatory apparatus that has brought executions in many states to a halt, while also failing to address the problems that led the Court to intervene in the first place. While execution chambers remain active in several states, constitutional regulation has contributed to the death penalty’s new fragility. In the next decade or two, Carol Steiker and Jordan Steiker argue, the fate of the American death penalty is likely to be sealed by this failed judicial experiment. Courting Death illuminates both the promise and pitfalls of constitutional regulation of contentious social issues.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="538" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Mode of access: Internet via World Wide Web.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="546" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">In English.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="588" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Description based on online resource; title from PDF title page (publisher's Web site, viewed 24. Aug 2021)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Capital punishment</subfield><subfield code="z">United States</subfield><subfield code="x">History.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Capital punishment</subfield><subfield code="z">United States.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Discrimination in capital punishment</subfield><subfield code="z">United States.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Judicial review</subfield><subfield code="z">United States.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">LAW / Constitutional.</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Title is part of eBook package:</subfield><subfield code="d">De Gruyter</subfield><subfield code="t">Harvard University Press Complete eBook-Package 2016</subfield><subfield code="z">9783110638585</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674974852</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://www.degruyter.com/isbn/9780674974852</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="3">Cover</subfield><subfield code="u">https://www.degruyter.com/cover/covers/9780674974852.jpg</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">978-3-11-063858-5 Harvard University Press Complete eBook-Package 2016</subfield><subfield code="b">2016</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV-deGruyter-alles</subfield></datafield></record></collection>